Sousa, Carla, Tsvetkova, Paulina, Pérez-Fuster, Patricia, Agius, May, Kostova, Snezhana, Bolesta, Karolina, Megda Garcia, Flávia, Nanchen, Benjamin, and Tkaczyk, Alan H.
AbstractContextPurposeMethods and resultsConclusion and implications\nIMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONContemporary technologies, such as mainstream and specialised Assistive Technologies (ATs), are seen as effective. However, there is a noticeable gap between technological progress and the ability to customise these technologies to meet the unique needs and characteristics of neurodivergent individuals, particularly those on the Autism Spectrum and people with Intellectual Disability (pwID).The goal of this study is to investigate the present requirements and future priorities acknowledged by specialists in the field regarding the progress of social inclusion for this population, making use of ATs.A qualitative survey involving 24 international experts, and its respective thematic analysis reveals challenges in social inclusion, emphasizing communication and physical accessibility, awareness gaps, and stigma. Concurrently, issues surrounding ATs include limited access, insufficient training, and a lack of awareness and skills, with individuals, and families being inadequately involved.The study proposes strategies for overcoming these challenges, with a focus on accessibility, awareness, skills, family involvement, and customization. Identified research needs encompass scientific development, inclusive approaches, and changes in technological development paradigms.Customization and Accessibility of Assistive Technologies (ATs): The research emphasizes the critical gap between existing ATs and their alignment with the needs of people with Intellectual Disability (pwID) and those on the autism spectrum. This is crucial for rehabilitation since its effectiveness is based on the consideration of individual requirements. In this sense, the present study involves enhancing the adaptability of technologies to support varied communication styles and learning abilities, thereby promoting greater independence and participation in daily activities, also through rehabilitation.Policy and Infrastructure Development: In an innovative manner, the study points out the systemic challenges, including inadequate policies and lack of support infrastructure, that hinder the effective use of ATs. For rehabilitation practices to be impactful, there is a need for policy reform and infrastructure development that prioritizes the provision and integration of ATs into education, employment, and community living. This includes ensuring funding for AT acquisition, creating inclusive educational and work environments, and improving public spaces to accommodate the needs of pwID and on the autism spectrum.Involvement of Individuals and Families in the AT Development Process: The paper highlights the limited involvement of individuals with ID and on the autism spectrum, and their families, in the process of developing and selecting ATs. Therefore, an important implication for rehabilitation is the need to adopt a person-centred approach that actively involves these individuals and their families in decision-making processes and, whenever possible, in co-creation processes. This approach ensures that AT solutions are better suited to the users’ preferences, challenges, and daily life contexts, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of technological aids in supporting social inclusion and autonomy.Adoption of Qualitative, In-Depth Methods in AT Research: The adoption of qualitative research methods in disability and health research significantly contributes to the development of human-centred, context-driven, and personalized technologies and rehabilitation strategies.Customization and Accessibility of Assistive Technologies (ATs): The research emphasizes the critical gap between existing ATs and their alignment with the needs of people with Intellectual Disability (pwID) and those on the autism spectrum. This is crucial for rehabilitation since its effectiveness is based on the consideration of individual requirements. In this sense, the present study involves enhancing the adaptability of technologies to support varied communication styles and learning abilities, thereby promoting greater independence and participation in daily activities, also through rehabilitation.Policy and Infrastructure Development: In an innovative manner, the study points out the systemic challenges, including inadequate policies and lack of support infrastructure, that hinder the effective use of ATs. For rehabilitation practices to be impactful, there is a need for policy reform and infrastructure development that prioritizes the provision and integration of ATs into education, employment, and community living. This includes ensuring funding for AT acquisition, creating inclusive educational and work environments, and improving public spaces to accommodate the needs of pwID and on the autism spectrum.Involvement of Individuals and Families in the AT Development Process: The paper highlights the limited involvement of individuals with ID and on the autism spectrum, and their families, in the process of developing and selecting ATs. Therefore, an important implication for rehabilitation is the need to adopt a person-centred approach that actively involves these individuals and their families in decision-making processes and, whenever possible, in co-creation processes. This approach ensures that AT solutions are better suited to the users’ preferences, challenges, and daily life contexts, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of technological aids in supporting social inclusion and autonomy.Adoption of Qualitative, In-Depth Methods in AT Research: The adoption of qualitative research methods in disability and health research significantly contributes to the development of human-centred, context-driven, and personalized technologies and rehabilitation strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]