Search

Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) require dual antiplatelet therapy and some require additional anticoagulation. We aimed to investigate the incidence of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) among PCI patients receiving antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. A population-based study that included all patients undergoing PCI during 2008–2016 in Iceland. Data from the Icelandic Medicines Registry were obtained on all outpatient prescriptions 1 year after first PCI. Patients receiving single or dual-antiplatelet therapy with or without anticoagulation cotherapy were analyzed. Rehospitalization for AGIB and endoscopic data were obtained within the 12-month follow-up period. A total of 5166 patients (male 75%) underwent PCI during the study period. The incidence of AGIB was 1% (54/5166) per year. The mean age among non-bleeders 65 (±11) years was lower than among bleeders 69 (±9) years (p =.002). The proportion of acute upper GIB (AUGIB) was 56%, whereas lower GIB occurred in 44%. Overall, 41% with AUGIB had PPIs compared to 39% of non-bleeders (NS). The incidence of AGIB among patients on single antiplatelet therapy combined with an anticoagulant was 2.5% compared to 0.9% among those on single antiplatelet treatment alone (p =.028). The number needed to harm (NNH) for treatment with single antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulant therapy compared to single antiplatelet therapy was 62 but no deaths related to AGIB. The 1-year incidence of AGIB was low with no mortality. Bleeding risk was found to be higher among patients on single antiplatelet therapy combined with anticoagulant therapy compared to patients on single antiplatelet therapy alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data on long-term rebleeding risk and mortality in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) patients are scarce and comparison to controls are lacking. Aimsof the study were to assess long-term prognosis of AUGIB patients and compare to controls. A population-based retrospective case-control study conducted at the National University Hospital of Iceland and included all patients who underwent endoscopy in 2010–2011. AUGIB was defined as haematemesis or coffee ground vomiting leading to hospitalization or occurring in a hospitalized patient. Controls underwent endoscopy in 2010–2011, matched for sex/age. Rebleeding was defined as AUGIB >14 days up to five years after index bleeding. Overall, 303 patients had AUGIB, mean age 67 (±18), controls66 years (±19), females, 51 and 46%, respectively. The five-year rebleeding rate for AUGIB patients was 13% (95%CI 9–17%), higher than the rate of bleeding events in controls, 3% (95%CI 1–5%; log-rank <0.001), hazard ratio (HR) 6.0 (95%CI 2.4–15) when correcting for comorbidities, NSAID's, PPI's and antithrombotics. The mortality of AUGIB patients at end of follow-up was higher when compared to controls, 39% (95%CI 49–33%) vs. 26% (95%CI 30–21%), log-rank <0.001, comorbidity-adjusted HR 1.4 (1.1–1.9). A subanalysis of non-variceal AUGIB yielded similar results in regard to rebleeding and mortality rates. AUGIB patients were at 6-fold risk of rebleeding compared to bleeding events in controls at five years of follow-up. Five-year mortality was higher in AUGIB patients when compared to controls even when correcting for age and comorbidities, suggesting that an episode of AUGIB indicates serious frailty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) risk scores have mainly focused on identifying high-risk patients. A risk score aimed at predicting which patients will not require hospital-based intervention may reduce unnecessary hospital admissions. The aim of the current study was to develop such a risk score. Material and Methods: A retrospective, population-based study that included patients presenting to the emergency room (ER) with LGIB from 2010 to 2013. Hospital-based intervention was defined as blood transfusion, endoscopic hemostasis, arterial embolization or surgery. The study cohort was split into train (70%) and test (30%) data. Train data were used to produce a multiple logistic regression model and a risk score that was validated on the test data. Results: Overall, 581 patients presented 625 times to the ER, mean age 61 (±22), males 49%. Of train data patients, 72% did not require hospital-based intervention. Independent predictors of low-risk patients (did not require hospital-based intervention) were systolic pressure ≥100mmHg (Odds ratio [OR] 4.9), hemoglobin >12g/dL (OR 103), hemoglobin 10.5-12.0g/dL (OR 19), no antiplatelets (OR 3.7), no anticoagulants (OR 2.2), pulse ≤100 (OR 2.9), and visible bleeding in the ER (OR 3.8). When validating the score on the test data, only 2% were wrongly predicted to be low-risk, the negative predictive value was 96% and the area under curve was 0.83. Conclusions: A new risk score has been developed for LGIB that may help identify low-risk patients in the ER that can be managed in an outpatient setting, thereby lowering unnecessary hospital admissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective:Limited data exist on the changes in the epidemiology of pancreatic cancer and outcomes over the last decades in population-based cohorts. We aimed to compare the incidence of pancreatic cancer, diagnostic, treatment and survival among patients diagnosed over the period 1986–2009. Materials and methods:A retrospective, nationwide, population-based study. All patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in Iceland in two periods, 1986–1997 (P1) and 1998–2009 (P2) were identified through the Icelandic Cancer Registry and relevant clinical information obtained from medical records. Results:A total of 645 patients were identified, 296 in P1 and 349 in P2 (NS). The incidence during P1 was 6.8 per 100,000 inhabitants and 6.2 during P2 (NS). Among biopsy-proven cancers, adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 89% of the cases in P1 and in P2 in 93% of the cases. Overall 38 (14%) in P1 underwent resection and 22 (7%) in P2 (p < .0004). Patients diagnosed in P2 had longer survival at 6 months (p = .015, log-rank test) and one year (p = .0206) after diagnosis. A total of 4/296 (1.4%) in P1 survived more than 5 years and 3/349 (0.9%) in P2 (NS). Conclusions:The incidence among patients with pancreatic cancer in Iceland did not show major changes during the last 20 years. Diagnostic approach has changed considerably demonstrating more patients that are not ‘resectable’. Survival rate at 6 months and one year has improved over the last two decades whereas the 5-year prognosis has not improved. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objective.Studies on unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) are lacking. We aimed to study the clinical outcomes of patients with unexplained GIB and to determine the incidence of obscure GIB.Material and methods.A population-based study on all patients undergoing endoscopy at the National University Hospital of Iceland in 2010. Indications, results of endoscopies and drug history were prospectively registered with a follow-up of 3 years. A national pharmaceutical database containing prescription data was utilized. Patients were categorized into unexplained overt and occult GIB and obscure GIB. Patients undergoing endoscopy and without GIB acted as controls.Results.Of 2471 patients undergoing endoscopy, 11% had unexplained GIB. Of those, 46% had unexplained overt GIB, 44% had unexplained occult GIB and 11% had obscure GIB. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with unexplained GIB and unexplained overt GIB had greater odds of NSAID use than controls, OR 1.8 (CI 1.03–3.03) and OR 2.0 (CI 1.01–3.77), respectively. Warfarin was strongly associated with all bleeder groups, OR 4–4.8. The incidence of obscure GIB was 10/100,000 inhabitants annually. Two (0.8%) patients were diagnosed with colon cancer 16 and 30 months after the index colonoscopy. Of patients with unexplained overt, unexplained occult GIB and controls, 5%, 6% and 3.5% (NS) had another overt bleeding episode, during the study period.Conclusions.NSAIDs and warfarin seem to play an important role in unexplained GIB. The incidence of obscure GIB is low and missed cancers are very rare. The probability of a repeat bleeding episode is similar to that of controls. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objective. According to clinical guidelines, a colonoscopy is recommended after an attack of diverticulitis in order to exclude colorectal cancer (CRC). This is based on studies prior to the use of computerized tomography (CT) for confirmation of the diagnosis. We aimed to investigate the findings of a subsequent colonoscopy after an attack of uncomplicated diverticulitis. Material and methods. The study cohort consisted of all patients with the diagnosis of uncomplicated diverticulitis, who underwent a subsequent colonoscopy 6-8 weeks later during a 6-years period in the National University Hospital of Iceland. The diagnosis of diverticulitis was based on clinical symptoms verified with a CT of the abdomen. Relevant clinical information was obtained from medical records and from the Icelandic Cancer Registry. Results. A total of 282 patients had uncomplicated diverticulitis and 199 patients underwent endoscopy. Two patients had CRC (0.7%), diagnosed with diverticulitis but did not recover clinically. All other patients recovered clinically. Colonic polyps were found in 33 of 195 (17%) cases. In 19/33 (58%) cases the histology demonstrated hyperplastic polyps, and in 13/33 (39%) adenoma with mild dysplasia. Only 1/33 (3%) of the colonic polyps were >1 cm in size. Conclusions. Among patients experiencing an attack of uncomplicated diverticulitis the frequency of CRC was equal to what might be expected compared to the average risk in the population. In these patients a routine colonoscopy in the absence of other clinical signs of CRC seems hardly necessary, if the clinical course is uneventful and the patient recovers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]