Search

Children have a right to play, as outlined by the United Nations, due to its important role in holistic development. However, as with many other human rights, children's access to their right to play was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions. With several studies demonstrating the ways in which children's play changed during times of restriction, this research aimed to explore whether these changes continued to be observed once restrictions had lifted. A mixed methods design was utilised: a 22-item questionnaire was distributed by schools in England to 124 caregivers who shared their observations of their children's play during times of restriction and the six months prior to data collection. Quantitative analysis demonstrates that increases in time to play, adult-child play, and outdoor play during the pandemic had been counteracted since restrictions were lifted; however, device play remained elevated. Qualitative comments highlight the impact of children's affect on their play, the activities children chose to pursue, and the extent of increases in screen time. The implications of these findings are discussed, including a need to place greater value on play in the home and the role of educational psychologists in supporting this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Physical restraint is a restrictive practice used in schools, but there are no up-to-date statistics concerning the frequency of its usage in England and there are concerns as to whether it is being used appropriately and effectively. Pupils with special educational needs are more likely to experience physical restraint in school, but opportunities for them to share their views through research are limited. Through semi-structured interviews, four primary-aged pupils from a specialist social, emotional and mental health (SEMH) educational setting shared their experiences of physical restraint, its impact on their relationships with staff members, and alternative strategies. Overall, participants had negative experiences of physical restraint, highlighting that it should be used for safety, but not for minor incidents. All participants identified useful alternative strategies that helped them to feel calmer. The ability to separate negative emotions associated with physical restraint and supporting staff members varied between participants. The findings are discussed in relation to implications for educational psychology practice and future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review seeks to synthesise qualitative studies that focus on the experience of grief and loss in people living with dementia. Included studies were quality appraised, synthesised and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. 19 studies were selected for inclusion in the final review and metasynthesis, including 486 participants (115 participants living with dementia, 152 family carers, 219 professionals). Five key dimensions of grief in people living with dementia were identified during the analysis process: grieving for the person I used to be, grieving for how others see me, grieving for the person I will become, grieving for those who have died and what helps me with my grief. It is evident that people living with dementia can experience grief related to a range of previous, current and anticipated losses. Many of the studies included in this review did not directly include people living with dementia in their research and did not ask participants directly about their experience of grief and loss. As grief is a highly personal and individual experience, further research addressing the experience of grief that directly includes participants living with dementia is required, in order to improve awareness of grief-related needs and to develop and deliver support to meet these needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To explore support processes and behaviours taking place during online peer support groups for family carers of people living with rare, non-memory-led and inherited dementias (PLWRD). Twenty-five family carers of PLWRD participated in a series of ongoing online peer support groups on the theme of 'Independence and Identity'. Transcripts from 16 sessions were analysed using qualitative directed content analysis with a coding framework informed by Cutrona & Suhr's (2004) Social Support Behaviour Code (SSBC). Most of the social support behaviours outlined in the SSBC were identified within the sessions, along with two novel social support categories – 'Experiential Support' and 'Community Support' – and novel support behaviours including 'Advocacy and Collective Action' and 'Uses Humour'. The SSBC code 'Relationship' appeared to be of central importance. This study sheds light on the unique challenges of the caring context for those affected by non-memory-led and inherited dementias and the significant contributions carers can offer to, and receive from, peers in similar situations. It highlights the importance of services which recognise the value of the informational and emotional expertise of carers of PLWRD and encourages the continued development and delivery of tailored support for these populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite evidence for the importance of playtime for children, the use of the withdrawal of playtime is a sanction that is used throughout schools in the UK. In light of this, there have been recent arguments highlighting the need to explore alternatives to this sanction in order to protect opportunities for playtime. This exploratory action research study included an initial focus group and multiple psychological consultations with teachers in a single setting to collaboratively explore and review potential alternatives. Findings include teachers wanting to address behaviours that often result in the withdrawal of playtime, and strategies to address these were co-constructed and implemented. Other findings included contextual barriers to stopping the use of withdrawing playtime, such as curriculum constraints, as well as facilitative aspects to stopping the withdrawal of playtime. Further implications for EP and school practice and research, as well as limitations, are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The participation of service users and the public in the development of clinical guidelines is increasingly valued in international guideline programmes. This paper extends the findings of Harding et al.'s (2010) exploration of the views of service users who participated in developing NICE mental health guidelines. This analysis considered the relative value of personal versus professional knowledge and experience, the barriers to service users contributing effectively in guideline development, the unspoken 'rules' concerning decision making, and issues of power and group dynamics. We combine these insights with observations from research in guideline development and with advances in the recovery movement and in the shared decision-making clinical model to suggest areas of improvement in guideline development, notably: translating evidence to recommendations, optimizing the acceptability of treatment recommendations to service users, and reconciling different types of knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aims: Although the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) mandates service user involvement in developing treatment guidelines, questions arise concerning appropriate mechanisms of involvement and its impact. This study sought to elicit users' perceptions of their involvement. Method: Grounded theory was used to analyse transcripts from interviews with 10 service user guideline development group representatives. Results: Four categories emerged suggesting that participants drew upon expertise developed through experience and impact upon the process and product of guideline development. Unwritten rules and social comparisons influence deliberations. Conclusions: Service users reported making a useful contribution despite intrinsic barriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Legislation, literature and research have recently advocated the importance of establishing and representing the views of children and young people. This study aimed to establish how Educational Psychologists (EPs) in one authority ascertain and present children's views in written reports. Content analysis was undertaken on the pupils' view section of 30 Year nine transition reports to determine the themes represented. Additionally focus group interviews helped identify EPs' methods for collecting, selecting and reporting pupils' views, indicating a wide variety of practice. EPs are challenged to explore report writing practices, in terms of representing the voice of the child, within their professional contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]