Search

Systemic corticosteroid administration, also called short bursts (SB), is harmful for patients with asthma; however, the actual burden of one-day SB remains unsolved. This study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of patients requiring one-day SB against asthma in clinical practice. Consecutive patients who regularly visited our hospital for asthma treatment between January 2019 and December 2020 were reviewed and followed for one year. SB was defined as ≥3 days of systemic corticosteroid treatment for an exacerbation. One-day SB was defined as one-day of systemic corticosteroid to treat an exacerbation. The one-day SB group included patients who received only one-day SB but no SB during the preceding year. Frequent SB was defined as that occurring ≥2 times/year. Data on 229 patients were analyzed. Among them, 2.6% (95% confidence interval 1.2–5.6%) were in the one-day SB group. The one-day SB group was female-dominant, obese, non-eosinophilic, and non-atopic. The median one-day SB was 1.5 times/year and almost half of one-day SB were performed by patients themselves. Independent of the low pulmonary function, high blood eosinophil count, and inhaled corticosteroid dose, one-day SB was associated with future frequent SB (adjusted odds ratio = 18.2, 95% confidence interval 1.1–288, P = 0.040, compared to the no SB group). Although one-day SB was not frequently experienced, even one-day SB without conventional SB was associated with future frequent SB. It is important to grasp the actual condition of one-day SB and to reinforce the treatment used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The data on intermittent systemic corticosteroid therapy for asthma exacerbation, clinically called a "short burst," is limited. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients with frequent systemic corticosteroid bursts for asthma in real clinical practice. Consecutive patients who regularly visited our hospital for asthma treatment between January 2019 and December 2020 were reviewed. The number of systemic corticosteroid bursts during the past 1 year was collected, and those with frequent bursts (≥2 times/year) were defined as the Frequent group. Data on 236 patients were analyzed. Among them, 5.5% (95% confidence interval 3.2–9.2%) were in the Frequent group. In the Frequent group, 23% of patients had no unplanned visits, and 38% experienced at least one corticosteroid burst without visiting a physician (self-medication). One-third of patients did not undertake high-dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment, and three-fourths of patients did not undertake long-acting muscarinic antagonist treatment. Low pulmonary function and increased blood eosinophils were independently associated with the Frequent group (adjusted odds ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.55–0.99, P = 0.039, per 10% predicted increase in a forced expiratory volume in 1 s; adjusted odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.29, P = 0.025, per 100/μL increase in blood eosinophils). There was a certain rate of frequent corticosteroid bursts in real clinical practice. It is important to determine the actual condition, as some patients experienced "hidden" frequent bursts and have the option to reinforce the treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. The availability of many types of inhalers in the treatment of asthma has resulted in a wide range of prescription choices for clinicians. With so many devices available, however, there is some confusion regarding their proper use among both medical staff and patients. Since 2007, Kitano Hospital and Kita-ku Pharmaceutical Association, Osaka, Japan, have provided a network system for delivering instruction on correct inhalation technique through community pharmacists. We examined the clinical effects of this network system. Methods. Our measurements included the manner in which community pharmacists instruct patients with asthma, the frequency of asthma exacerbations, patients' adherence to inhalation therapy using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, and patients' health status both prior to this system and at 4 years after. Results. Usable information was obtained from 53 community pharmacists and 146 patients with asthma at baseline and from 60 community pharmacists and 148 patients at 4 years. When compared with baseline values, significant improvement was found in pharmacists' instruction and significant decreases were observed in the frequency of asthma exacerbations (1.4 ± 1.6 vs. 1.0 ± 1.4 times/yr, p = .042) and emergency room visits (0.5 ± 1.0 vs. 0.2 ± 0.5 times/yr, p = .004). Adherence to the inhalation regimen significantly increased (4.0 ± 0.7 vs. 4.2 ± 0.8, p = .041), but health status was unchanged. Conclusions. Our network system may improve asthma control and adherence to inhalation regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adherence to inhalation therapy is a critical determinant of the success of asthma management. Reasons for nonadherence have been well studied, but reasons for good adherence are poorly understood. Understanding the mechanisms of adherence to inhalation therapy is important in developing strategies to promote adherence. The objective of this study was to assess the factors and mechanisms that contribute to and the clinical outcomes relating to adherence to inhalation therapy. Methods: The factors and outcomes related to adherence to inhalation therapy were examined cross-sectionally in 176 adults with asthma using a self-reported adherence questionnaire that consisted of four items dealing with the use of inhaled controller medications. A 5-point Likert scale was used for the responses to each item. Adherence was assessed based on the overall mean adherence score. Results: Of the 176 patients who were potential participants, 146 (83%) responded with usable information. Significant factors associated with the overall mean adherence score were older age ( r = .18, p = .032) and receiving repeated instruction on inhalation techniques ( p = .0016). Of the 146 respondents, 25 (17.1%) patients were given repeated verbal instruction or demonstrations of inhalation technique by a respiratory physician. On logistic regression analysis, good adherence to inhalation therapy was significantly related to the receiving of repeated instruction on inhalation technique, with an odds ratio of 2.90 (95% confidence interval 1.07–7.88; p = .037). Furthermore, less intentional nonadherent behavior was reported in patients with repeated instruction on inhalation technique compared to those without it. A significant correlation was found between the overall mean adherence score and the frequency of asthma exacerbations ( r = −.19, p = .021), emergency room visits ( r = −.19, p = .042), and the health-related quality of life score (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire: Total, r = −.22, p = .024; Symptoms, r = −.21, p = .022; Impacts, r = −.20, p = .035). Conclusions: Repeated instruction on inhalation techniques may contribute to adherence to inhalation therapy through decreasing intentional nonadherence. Furthermore, good adherence to the therapeutic regimen may offer good asthma-related outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]