Search

Quality assurance guidelines are essential to provide uniform execution of clinical trials and treatment in the application of hyperthermia. This document provides definitions for a good hyperthermia treatment and identifies the clinical conditions where a certain hyperthermia system can or cannot adequately heat the tumour volume. It also provides brief description of the characteristics and performance of the current electromagnetic (radiative and capacitive), ultrasound and infra-red heating techniques. This information helps to select the appropriate heating technique for the specific tumour location and size, and appropriate settings of the water bolus and thermometry. Finally, requirements of staff training and documentation are provided. The guidelines in this document focus on the clinical application and are complemented with a second, more technical quality assurance document providing instructions and procedure to determine essential parameters that describe heating properties of the applicator for superficial hyperthermia. Both sets of guidelines were developed by the ESHO Technical Committee with participation of senior STM members and members of the Atzelsberg Circle. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Purpose: This study was designed to assess technical success and complications in patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcomas undergoing CT fluoroscopy-guided closed-tip catheter placement before treatment with combined chemotherapy and regional hyperthermia.Materials and methods: This retrospective study comprised all patients referred for insertion of closed-tip catheters for the introduction of thermometry probes before regional hyperthermia treatment at a single university centre from 2010 to 2015. Catheter placements were performed under local anaesthesia and intermittent CT fluoroscopy guidance. Technical success, complication rate, duration of catheter insertion and dose–length product (DLP) were analysed. Technical success was defined as intratumoural catheter placement suitable for subsequent thermometry.Results: A total of 35 procedures were performed on 35 patients (22 men, 13 women). In 34 out of 35 interventions catheters were inserted successfully; in one patient catheter placement was not feasible. No intra-interventional complications occurred. In six patients post-interventional complications were observed – two major (one abscess formation and one severe catheter dislocation) and four minor complications. Technical failure was observed in 11.4% of patients, especially catheter kinking. A total of 55 catheters were placed, with a mean number of 1.7 ± 0.7 per patient. Mean total DLP was 723.2 ± 355.9 mGy*cm.Conclusion: CT fluoroscopy-guided closed-tip catheter placement into high-risk soft tissue sarcomas was characterised by high technical success and relatively low complication rate. While major complications were rarely observed, catheter-kinking preventing successful thermometry represented the most frequent technical failure. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Purpose: There is no standard second-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) after gemcitabine (G) failure. Cisplatin (Cis)-based chemotherapy has shown activity in APC. It is proven that cytotoxicity of G and Cis is enhanced by heat exposure at 40° to 42°C. Therefore G plus Cis with regional hyperthermia (RHT) might be beneficial for patients with G-refractory APC. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analysed 23 patients with advanced ( n = 2) or metastatic ( n = 21) pancreatic cancer with relapse after G mono first-line chemotherapy ( n = 23). Patients had received G (day 1, 1000 mg/m2) and Cis (day 2 and 4, 25 mg/m2) in combination with RHT (day 2 and 4, 1 h) biweekly for 4 months. We analysed feasibility, toxicity, time to second progression (TTP2), overall survival (OS) and clinical response. Results: Between October 1999 and August 2008 23 patients were treated. Haematological toxicity was low with no grade 4 event. Hyperthermia-associated toxicity consisted of discomfort because of bolus pressure (3%), power-related pain (7%) or position-related pain (17%). Median TTP1 was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.6-9.2), median TTP2 was 4.3 months (95%CI: 1.2-7.4) and OS 12.9 months (95%CI: 9.9-15.9). The disease control rate in 16 patients with available CT scans was 50%. Conclusion: We show first clinical data of G plus Cis with RHT being clinically active in G-pretreated APC with low toxicity. A prospective controlled phase II second-line clinical trial (EudraCT: 2005-003855-11) and a randomised phase III adjuvant clinical trial offering this treatment (HEAT; EudraCT: 2008-004802-14) are currently open for recruitment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the radiological criteria RECIST, WHO, and tumor volume for evaluation of tumor response in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) showing either good or poor pathohistological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia, and to examine the dependence of the findings on the applied thermal dose. Materials and methods:19 patients with pathohistological complete response (no vital tumor cells, group 1) and 27 with pathohistological no response (<25% necrosis, group 2) were selected from our previous clinical trials. The change in tumor size before and after therapy was determined. Intratumoral temperature (T90) and thermal dose (CEM 43°C T90) were calculated for 13 patients. Results: In the first group, 6 partial response (PR) and 13 stable disease (SD) according to RECIST, 7 PR and 12 SD according to WHO, 7 PR and 12 SD according to volumetric criteria were evaluated. In the second group, the results were 10 PR and 17 SD (RECIST), 9 PR and 18 SD (WHO), 8 PR and 19 SD (volume). The concordance of these criteria was 73.7% in group 1 and 74% in group 2. PR and SD were equally distributed in both groups (p > 0.421). Thermal parameters were not different between the groups (p > 0.327). Conclusions: SD or PR in radiological response assessment does not correlate with the pathohistological response after neoadjuvant thermochemotherapy. RECIST, WHO and volumetric criteria for response evaluation in STS are in substantial agreement. For irregularly shaped lesions, volumetric criteria seem to be more appropriate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]