Search

The true differences between barefoot and shod running are difficult to directly compare because of the concomitant change to a mid/forefoot footfall pattern that typically occurs during barefoot running. The purpose of this study was to compare isolated effects of footwear structure and cushioning on running mechanics in habitual mid/forefoot runners running shod (SHOD), barefoot (BF), and barefoot on a foam surface (BF+FOAM). Ten habitually shod mid/forefoot runners were recruited (male = 8, female = 2). Repeated measures ANOVA (α = 0.05) revealed differences between conditions for only vertical peak active force, contact time, negative and total ankle joint work, and peak dorsiflexion angle. Post hoc tests revealed that BF+FOAM resulted in smaller vertical active peak magnitude and instantaneous vertical loading rate than SHOD. SHOD resulted in lower total ankle joint work than BF and BF+FOAM. BF+FOAM resulted in lower negative ankle joint work than either BF or SHOD. Contact time was shorter with BF than BF+FOAM or SHOD. Peak dorsiflexion angle was smaller in SHOD than BF. No other differences in sagittal joint kinematics, kinetics, or ground reaction forces were observed. These overall similarities in running mechanics between SHOD and BF+FOAM question the effects of footwear structure on habituated mid/forefoot running described previously. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Footstrike angle (FSA) has been widely used to classify footstrike pattern (FSP). However, inconsistent FSA cut-off values were adopted in previous studies. This study aimed to validate the FSA cut-off values in runners. Stride index, the gold standard to determine FSP, and FSA were obtained when 15 experienced runners, 14 novice runners and 14 untrained individuals performed 3-min run on an instrumented treadmill at their preferred running speeds in habitual, rearfoot, midfoot and forefoot strike patterns. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve associated with the Youden index, the optimal FSA cut-off values were −0.8° (i.e., cut-off angle for forefoot strike) –7.4° (i.e., cut-off angle for rearfoot strike) for runners. We observed minor differences in the FSA cut-off values across runners with various running experience and a wider cut-off range for midfoot strikers when a modified strike index was utilized. This validation study established cut-off footstrike angles for runners' FSP classification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study sought to compare the kinetics and kinematics data in a group of habitual shod runners when running in traditional running shoes and newly designed minimalist shoes with lug platform. This novel footwear design claims to simulate barefoot running and reduce energy loss during impact. We compared footstrike angle (FSA), vertical average (VALR) and instantaneous (VILR) loading rates, energy loss and initial vertical stiffness between two shoe conditions. Runners demonstrated a decreased FSA while running in minimalist shoes with lug platform than traditional shoes (P = 0.003; Cohen’sd = 0.918). However, we did not observe a landing pattern transition. VALR and VILR between two footwear conditions showed no significant difference (P = 0.191–0.258; Cohen’sd = 0.304–0.460). Initial vertical stiffness (P = 0.032; Cohen’sd = 0.671) and energy loss (P = 0.044; Cohen’sd = 0.578) were greater when running in minimalist shoes with lug platform. The results show that minimalist shoes with lug platform reduce the FSA but may not lead to a landing pattern switch or lower vertical loading rates. Interestingly, the new shoe design leads to a greater energy loss than traditional running shoes, which could be explained by a higher initial vertical stiffness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]