Search

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is an exceedingly rare non–Langerhans cell CD68+ CD1a- S100- histiocytic multi-organ disease. Diagnosis of ECD is often delayed due to non-specific radiographic findings and heterogeneous lesional tissue. Increasingly, the role of genomic alterations is being recognized for both diagnosis and treatment of ECD. More than half of ECD patients harbor the BRAFV600E mutation. Evaluation for this mutation be can falsely negative on immunohistochemical staining and confirmation with molecular analyses is recommended. We present a case of the 44 year-old male with BRAFV600E-positive ECD treated successfully with steroids followed by single-agent dabrafenib. Plain language summary Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is an exceedingly rare type of histiocytosis (a disorder of white blood cells). The diagnosis of ECD can be challenging because tissue biopsy may not provide a definitive diagnosis. Currently, genetic mutations can be used to support both diagnosis and treatment. We present a case of the 44 year-old male with BRAF V600E -positive ECD who was treated successfully with steroids followed by dabrafenib. Executive summary Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) is exceedingly rare. ECD with central nervous system involvement can be refractory to conventional therapies. Steroids may be therapeutic for ECD. Molecular profiling should be obtained to assess for BRAFV600E mutation, regardless of a negative immunohistochemical BRAF immunohistochemical staining. BRAF inhibitors should be considered as first-line therapy for BRAFV600E-positive ECD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To provide a comprehensive review of ocular and orbital manifestations of Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) and compare clinical outcomes with vemurafenib (INN) to historical treatments (HT). Primary outcomes are ophthalmic findings on presentation, changes in visual acuity, and mortality rate. Secondary outcomes include the progression of ocular findings, systemic involvements, and treatment modalities. Methods: All published literature from January 1983 to March 2021 was searched for ophthalmic manifestations of ECD. Clinical outcomes following HT were collected and compared with INN. Results: Forty-seven patients with ECD and ophthalmic presentations were identified. The mean age was 49.6 years (SD = 15.0). Proptosis (65.6%) and extraocular muscle restrictions (42.5%) were the most common presenting signs. Of 41 (87.2%) patients with orbital masses on radiologic examination, 90.2% were bilateral, and 53.7% were located in the intraconal space. Ophthalmic examination was significant for xanthelasma (27.2%), optic disc edema (34.0%), and subretinal changes (21.3%). Common treatments were systemic steroids (76.6%), interferon-a (17.0%), and cyclophosphamide (14.9%). INN was less commonly used (12.8%). The mean change in logMAR visual acuity declined with HT (29.9%) but improved with INN (79.1%) (p > 0.05). The proportion of eyes with complete vision loss increased after HT (p < 0.05). The overall mortality rate was 27.7% and notably higher in the HT group (29.3%) when compared to the INN group (16.7%) (p > 0.05). Conclusion: ECD presents with many ophthalmic manifestations. Although the intraocular treatments remain controversial, INN should be highly considered in treating orbital ECD patients with BRAF-V600E mutations to prevent and reverse vision loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]