1. Is Rubin's 'taking-in' and 'taking-hold' a useful paradigm?
- Author
-
Martell LK
- Subjects
NURSING models ,RESEARCH evaluation ,ANALYSIS of variance ,MATERNITY nursing ,T-test (Statistics) ,MOTHERHOOD ,THEORY ,REPEATED measures design ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,SCALE analysis (Psychology) ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,FACTOR analysis ,STATISTICAL hypothesis testing ,RESEARCH funding ,POSTNATAL care - Abstract
Rubin's 'taking-in' and 'taking-hold' model has been a dominant paradigm for postpartum nursing. To determine whether 'taking-in' and 'taking-hold' apply to contemporary hospitalized postpartum women, I conducted a repeated measures survey of 95 women with uncomplicated postpartum courses after vaginal births during their hospital stay. 'Taking-in' and 'taking-hold' were measured with the Martell Postpartum Questionnaire-Revised (MPQ-R), a paper-and pencil instrument. An expert panel established the content validity of the MPQ-R in this study. Cronbach's alpha for the two subscales ranged from .40 to .60, a result of skewed distribution of items or lack of variability in scores. The participants were neither 'taking-in' nor 'taking-hold.' The distribution of the participants' responses was similar to each others' and indicated that their postpartum experiences included some aspects of both 'taking-in' and 'taking-hold.' Despite the limitations of the MPQ-R and the research methods, the findings suggest that Rubin's theory has limited usefulness for postpartum nursing of contemporary women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 1996
- Full Text
- View/download PDF