Search

Task-specific rehabilitation is a key indicator for successful rehabilitation to improve the upper limb performance after stroke. Assistive robotic and non-robotic devices are emerging to provide rehabilitation therapy; however, the effectiveness of task-specific training programs using assistive training devices compared with task-specific usual care training has not been summarized yet. Therefore, the effectiveness of task-specific training using assistive arm devices (TST-AAD) compared with task-specific usual care (TSUC) on the upper limb performance of patients with a stroke was investigated. To assess task specificity, a set of criteria was proposed: participation, program, relevant, repeated, randomized, reconstruction and reinforced. Out of 855 articles, 17 fulfilled the selection criteria. A meta-analysis was performed on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores in the subacute and chronic stages after stroke and during follow-up. Both TST-AAD and TSUC improved the upper limb performance after stroke. In the sub-acute phase after stroke, TST-AAD was more effective than TSUC in reducing the upper limb impairment, although findings were based on only three studies. In the chronic phase, TST-AAD and TSUC showed similar effectiveness. No differences between the two types of training were found at the follow-up measurements. Future studies should describe training, device usage and criteria of task specificity in a standardized way to ease comparison. Arm or hand function is often undertreated in stroke patients, assistive training devices may be able to improve the upper limb performance. Task-specific training using assistive devices is effective in improving the upper limb performance after stroke. Task-specific training using assistive devices seems to be more effective in reducing impairment compared with task specific usual care in the subacute phase after stroke, but they are equally effective in the chronic phase of stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of an 8-week walking training programme using a novel assistive gait training device in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). This study was a pilot, single group, pretest-posttest study design. Participants received walking training, 3 sessions a week for 8 weeks. Participants were trained on a treadmill using a novel assistive gait training device. Feasibility data about recruitment, retention, compliance, and participants' performance, and participants' perception were collected throughout the study period. 11 participants with chronic SCI (8 males, 3 females, age: 38 ± 10 years old, injury levels T3-L1; injury onset 8 ± 10 years) completed the study. The recruitment rate of 27.2% reached in this study was acceptable. Throughout the period of training, all participants were able to progress in their walking performance with respect to treadmill speed, walking distance, duration of training, and percentage of body weight support. The overall compliance rate of participants with training sessions was 96.2 ± 6.5%. From responses to the end intervention questionnaire, the majority of participants showed positive perception to the walking training programme as well as the assistive gait training. The 8 weeks of walking training was feasible in individuals with chronic SCI. The assistive gait training device was feasible and safe to use in individuals with paraplegia. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT03940274 The use of a novel assistive gait training device using a pulley system with a pulling cable walking training is feasible. The novel assistive gait training device will reduce workload by allowing physical therapists to work on an ergonomic position while providing the necessary stepping assistance for the patient's legs/feet during walking on a treadmill. The novel assistive gait training device is developed to provide a low-cost assistive device to be used in walking rehabilitation for people with spinal cord injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We provide an overview of some biomedical technologies able to relieve everyday impairments in neurological patients. Two literature searches from 2009 to 2020 were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cinahl and Scopus. The studies meeting the criteria for eligibility constituted 224 of the 6257 identified studies. The first literature search resulted in the identification of 53 different neurological impairments. The following impairments were selected as the most general: six motor (walking/gait abnormality, paralysis/paresis, hypertonia, dystonia, tremor and ataxia), three cognitive (memory, attention/concentration and executive dysfunction), two sensory (visual and hearing impairments) and three uncategorized impairments (communication impairments, sleep abnormalities and seizures/epilepsies). The second literature search resulted in the identification of 22 biomedical technologies able to compensate or rehabilitate the neurological impairments. This review identified some of the common neurological impairments across diseases and showed that technology can be beneficial for neurological patients by helping them with everyday living. The review also found that different aspects such as personal aspects of the intended users (e.g., impairments) and physical and environmental context of the task play an essential role in the usefulness of the technology. Neurological diseases are globally the leading cause of disability, whereby there is a great need for rehabilitation of neurological impairments. Assistive technology can compensate for permanent impairments or be used in rehabilitation as an alternative to usual therapy or an adjunct to increase overall therapy time. This study provides an overview of existing assistive technology and how patients with neurological impairments can benefit from technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The assistive knee exoskeleton device is used for supporting the surrounding ligaments, tendons, and muscles of the injured knee joint. Various knee exoskeletons have been discussed; however, their shape synthesis is not reported. This study aims to present the shape synthesis of the assistive knee device. Moreover, four-bar linkage is used for the knee exoskeleton, in this study. Methods: Clinical biomechanical data are adapted from gait database for one gait cycle. Using the clinical gait data, position and static force analyses are performed to obtain a set of orientations and unknown forces. Simultaneously, CAD models are prepared, and the obtained forces are applied to the CAD models of the four-bar linkage knee exoskeleton. Consequently, the threshold is obtained for each component of the knee exoskeleton and the unwanted material below the threshold is removed. Results: A reduction of 45% in the peak actuating force is observed in comparison with the literature. Besides, a total reduction of 21% in the mass of four-bar knee exoskeleton is observed in contrast to the base models when shape synthesis is performed. Conclusions: An assistive knee exoskeleton is developed using the shape synthesis methodology in which four-bar linkage is used. New shapes of thigh and shank attachments are obtained. The developed knee exoskeleton can be used by persons with the injured knee for supporting the ligaments, tendons, and muscles. Besides, control technology can be implemented to make it useful for persons with monoplegia. Assistive knee exoskeleton devices proved to be an important tool for providing support to injured knee joints. Typically single axis joints are observed in the lower limb exoskeletons which can be replaced with linkage mechanisms to obtain the desired range of motion. In this study, four-bar linkages are used for the knee exoskeleton in which cranks and rockers are connected to the lateral and medial sides of the knee joint, for connecting shank and thigh attachments. Shape synthesis is performed on the components of four-bar exoskeleton through the evaluated reaction forces. The components are assembled to form an assistive knee exoskeleton which can be used by any person with injured knee joint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this review is to analyse the different existing technologies for gait rehabilitation, focusing mainly in robotic devices. Those robots help the patient to recover a lost function due to neurological gait disorders, accidents or after injury. Besides, they facilitate the identification of normal and abnormal features by registering muscle activity providing the doctor important data where he can observe the evolution of the patient. Method: A deep literature review was realized using selected keywords considering not only the most common medical and engineering databases, but also other available sources that provide information on commercial and scientific gait rehabilitation devices. The founded literature for this review corresponds to control techniques for gait rehabilitation robots, since the early seventies to the present year. Results: Different control strategies for gait analysis in rehabilitation devices have been developed and implemented such as position control, force and impedance control, haptic simulation, and control of EMG signals. These control techniques are used to analyze the force of the patient during therapy, compensating it with the force generated by the mechanism in the rehabilitation device. It is observed that the largest number of studies reported, focuses on the impedance control technique. Leading to include new control techniques and validate them using the necessary protocols with ill patients, obtaining reliable results that allows a progressive and active rehabilitation. Conclusions: With this exhaustive review, we can conclude that the degree of complexity of the rehabilitation device influences in short and long-term therapeutic results since the movements become more controlled. However, there is still a lot of work in the sense of motion control in order to perform trajectories that are more alike the natural movements of humans. There are many control techniques in other areas, which seek to improve the performance of the process. These techniques may possibly be applicable in gait rehabilitation devices, obtaining controllers that are more efficient and that adapts to different people and the necessities that entail every disease. Implications for Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation helps people to improve the activities of their daily life, allowing them to observe their progress in the functional abilities as the months pass by with intensive and repetitive therapies. There is a mobility issue when the patient needs to move to the hospital or to the laboratory, which is not always feasible. For overcoming it, patients use the equipment at home to perform their daily therapy. However, they need the sufficient knowledge about its operation, also about the therapeutic movements, the therapy duration and the movement speed. Besides, is necessary to place the equipment in a proper and lively environment that helps to forget or reduce pain while the patient moves his joints progressively. The purpose of robotic rehabilitation devices is to generate repetitive and progressive movements, according to the motor disability. There are training trajectories to follow, which motivate patients to generate active movements. The benefits of robotic rehabilitation depend on the ability of each patient to adapt to the speed and load variations generated by the device, improving and reinforcing motor functions in therapy, especially in patients with advanced disabilities in early rehabilitation. Multi-joint rehabilitation devices are more effective than single-joint rehabilitation devices because they involve a higher number of muscles in the therapy. The greater the number of degrees of freedom (DoF) of the device, it cushions its effect in the patient because the inertia is reduced and higher torques are generated. The assistive technological devices allows to explore different rehabilitation techniques that motivate the patient in therapy, increasing appropriately the energy and pressure in the blood which is reflected in gradually recovering his ability to walk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Rehabilitation professionals have little information concerning lower limb exoskeletons for people with paraplegia. This study has four objectives: (1) Outline the characteristics of the exoskeletons’ design and their usefulness evidence as assistive mobility devices in the community for the Rewalk™, Mina, Indego®, Ekso™ (previously known as the eLEGS™) and Rex®; (2) document functional mobility outcomes of using these exoskeletons; (3) document secondary skills and benefits achieved with these exoskeletons, safety, user satisfaction and applicability in the community; and (4) establish level of scientific evidence of the selected studies.Method: A systematic review of the literature (January 2004 to April 2014) was done using the databases PubMed, CINAHL and Embase and groups of keywords associated with “exoskeleton”, “lower limb” and “paraplegia”.Results: Seven articles were selected. Exoskeleton use is effective for walking in a laboratory but there are no training protocols to modify identified outcomes over the term usage (ReWalk™: 3 months, Mina: 2 months and Indego®: 1 session). Levels of evidence of selected papers are low.Conclusions: The applicability and effectiveness of lower limb exoskeletons as assistive devices in the community have not been demonstrated. More research is needed on walking performance with these exoskeletons compared to other mobility devices and other training contexts in the community.Implications for rehabilitationCharacteristics of the exoskeletons’ design and their usefulness evidence as assistive mobility devices in the community are addressed for the Rewalk™, Mina, Indego®, Ekso™ and Rex® ReWalk™, Indego® and Mina lower limb exoskeletons are effective for walking in a laboratory for individuals with complete lower-level SCI.The ReWalk™ has the best results for walking, with a maximum speed of 0.51 m/s after 45 sessions lasting 60 to 120 min; it is comparable to the average speed per day or per week in a manual wheelchair.The level of scientific evidence is low. Other studies are needed to provide more information about performance over the longer term when walking with an exoskeleton, compared to wheelchair mobility, the user’s usual locomotion, the use of different exoskeletons or the training context in which the exoskeleton is used. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Purpose: To develop an aquatic exercise device to facilitate locomotive motor output and achieve repetitive physiological gait patterns to improve movement dysfunctions.Methods: A custom designed leg movement apparatus (LMA) consisted of closed 4-linkage mechanisms and one-length changeable link using a spring. Three-dimensional motions and electromyographic (EMG) activities were recorded in eight healthy subjects to evaluate the reproducibility of the physiological gait patterns using the LMA with or without a spring apparatus in water.Results: Using the LMA with a spring apparatus compared to walking in water, the foot trajectories and the time course of the elevation angles in each lower limb joint kinematics were preserved. The time-series of the EMG showed reciprocal modulation between agonist and antagonist muscle groups in the hip and ankle joints. However, the amplitudes of the tibialis anterior muscle in the first half and rectus femoris in the last half of the movement cycle were reduced using the LMA with a spring apparatus.Conclusion: We developed a novel aquatic exercise device to reproduce physiological gait patterns. The LMA with a spring apparatus would be particularly valuable in therapy for movement dysfunctions to facilitate locomotive motor outputs.Implications for RehabilitationThe leg movement apparatus with spring for underwater use (LMA) would be effective gait training to induce the locomotor-like EMG activities.Hydrotherapy with the LMA has advantages over the partial body weight support treadmill training on land with a robotic device; (1) the LMA is electrically and mechanically safe, and (2) the LMA would require self-effort to generate the gait pattern for movement disorders, or also enable passive gait training by the physiotherapists. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Purpose: The purpose was to compare the effectiveness of robotic-assisted body weight supported treadmill training using the Lokomat® to over-ground gait training (OGT) in adults with chronic stroke. Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to the Lokomat® or OGT interventions. Both protocols included 40 sessions over 8 weeks. Primary outcome measures were the 10-meter walk test and 6-minute walk distance. Secondary measures included the Functional Independence MeasureTM locomotion score, Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Motor Score (FM-LE), Barthel Index, and Stroke Impact Scale. Blinded assessors tested the participants at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. Results: Eleven Lokomat® and nine OGT participants completed the study. Within group differences in the FM-LE score and Barthel Index occurred over time from baseline to post-intervention and baseline to 3-month follow-up. No other within group differences and no between group differences were observed. Conclusions: Although walking measures did not show significant changes between groups, LE motor function and physical functional levels improved over time within both groups. The Lokomat® may allow aggressive locomotor training, particularly for the lower functioning patients who wish to improve walking ability due to apparent eased therapist physical burden, when compared to OGT, although an increased risk of skin breakdown is present. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]