Search

Background: In China, premature children in good health may be advised to receive routine immunization programs. However, delayed vaccination is common. This study aimed to characterize vaccination experiences of premature children and determine the impact of vaccination consultation clinic (VCC) assessment., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study, including premature children visiting VCC at Children's Hospital of Fudan University in 2017-2019. Data of these children, including demographics, recommendations of vaccination after VCC assessment, vaccination records, adverse events following immunization (AEFI), and incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases in 2017-2019, were collected retrospectively., Results: A total of 1124 premature children were included, with vaccination uptake of 46.3% for expanded program of immunization (EPI) vaccines and 15.1% for non-EPI vaccines before VCC assessment. Furthermore, 77.5% of premature children who had not received any EPI vaccine were vaccinated after the assessment; however, most were delayed, regardless of vaccine types and recommendations. In contrast, 67.3% was vaccinated with non-EPI vaccines after the assessment. Majority (n = 35) of recorded AEFI was mild to moderate, in addition to one allergic rash. One each case of pertussis and varicella were recorded in those who had not received the corresponding vaccines., Conclusion: Vaccination may be safe and epidemiological effective in premature children. However, it remains mostly delayed in premature children with recommendations of normal vaccination. It warrants improving implementation of VCC recommendations. In addition, there is a need of health promotion on more non-EPI vaccines for premature children.

Objectives: Delayed vaccination in children with seizures was common in China. This study aims to describe the vaccination status, reasons for vaccination deferral, vaccination recommendations and the safety for these patients in Zhejiang., Methods: 1539 children included were divided into febrile seizure (FS) group, epilepsy (EP) group, unclassified seizure group and other symptomatic seizure group. Medical records and reasons for the vaccination deferral were collected by questionnaire. Vaccination data and Adverse Event Following Immunization were retrieved from vaccination booklets., Results: The main diseases of children enrolled were FS (756, 49.1%) and EP (443, 28.8%). Most of them (95.6%) were vaccinated on time before the onset of seizure, but their vaccination was delayed after seizure occurred. 76.1% were recommended to receive vaccines normally, of which the FS group accounted for the highest proportion (90.3%). 88.73% of them were vaccinated as recommended, and no serious side effects or seizure occurred. The main reason for vaccination deferral was providers' and parents' hesitation to have them vaccinated., Conclusion: Seizures were overestimated as a contraindication for vaccination in China. Routine vaccination was safe in most circumstances. It is essential to educate providers and parents about the benefits and contraindications of vaccination in children with seizures.

There has been a considerable controversy about vaccination practices in Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) in China. This study aims to identify the reasons for deferring vaccination among the patient population attending the Vaccination Consultation Clinic in Zhejiang Province and the safety of their vaccination. We analyzed the data of 2442 children with CHD, who visited to our clinic from January 2016 to March 2019. A questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate the reasons for their delayed vaccination. Information about the following vaccination and Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) was collected. Most of the enrolled children did not receive vaccines on time before consultation. The reasons for their deferring vaccination included: 1. Providers in the community health center refused to administer vaccines (77.6%); 2. Parents' concerns about the safety of vaccines (19.0%); 3. Parents' doubts about the efficiency of vaccines after certain drug applications (3.4%). According to the evaluation reports issued by the Vaccination Consultation Clinic, 83.7% of CHD children were recommended to be vaccinated on the nationally recommended schedule, 14.4% were recommended to defer some specific vaccination, and 1.9% were recommended to defer all vaccination. Among the group who received vaccines on nationally recommended schedule, the AEFI rate was 33.5/100 000. No rare or serious rare vaccine reactions were observed. Our study provides evidence that routine vaccination is safe in the majority of this patient population.