Search

Aim: To define the prognostic significance of first-line TKI in mRCC patients receiving nivolumab. Materials and methods: A total of 571 mRCC patients who received ≥second line nivolumab were included in this subanalysis. The correlation between prior TKI (sunitinib vs. pazopanib) and overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were investigated. Additionally, the impact of TKI choice according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic score was examined. Results: There was no significant difference between sunitinib and pazopanib groups in terms of mPFS, mOS, overall response rate and disease control rate. Moreover, no difference between sunitinib and pazopanib was found according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic score. Conclusion: There is no conclusive evidence favoring pazopanib or sunitinib treatment before initiating nivolumab therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

For years, prospective randomized clinical trials excluded patients with non-conventional histologies of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The paucity of data has led to adopting the same treatment strategies used for clear-cell RCC (ccRCC). In the present narrative review, we explored state of the art about use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in variant histologies of RCC. According to the results collected, ICIs as monotherapy showed promising antitumor activity in advanced non-clear cell (ncc)RCC. The objective response rate (ORR) was similar to that observed with single-agent anti-PD-1 in the ccRCC population, either in the first-line or the second-line setting, and responder patients experienced an early and durable benefit. Combined ICI-based strategies have shown increasing evidence in nccRCC and robust results in the sarcomatoid variants of RCC. A definitive recommendation about treating non-conventional histologies, either in adjuvant or metastatic settings, should be supported by more extensive dedicated trials.

The phase III MPACT trial demonstrated the superiority of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (NABGEM) versus gemcitabine alone in previously untreated patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the responses in terms of efficacy and safety in patients treated with more than 6 cycles of chemotherapy. From January 2015 to December 2018, patients with mPC receiving first-line treatment with NABGEM were included in a multicentre retrospective observational study. Exploratory analyses of efficacy and safety were performed. The cohort included 153 patients with performance status of 1. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 20 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.44) and 10 months (HR 0.24 95% CI: 0.16-0.38) respectively, in patients who received >6 cycles compared to 9 and 5 months in those treated with ≤6 cycles ( p  < 0.001). The disease control rate was 100% versus 56% in patients receiving >6 and ≤6 cycles, respectively. No progression of disease was recorded in patients who received >6 cycles. Grade 1 neuropathy and grade 3 neutropenia were more frequent in patients treated with >6 cycles compared to patients receiving ≤6 cycles ( p  = 0.01; p  = 0.03, respectively). Dose reduction was necessary for 70.1% and 53.4% of patients treated with >6 or ≤6 cycles, whereas treatment interruption occurred in 37.1% and 21.6%, respectively. Our results confirmed the efficacy and safety of NABGEM in untreated mPC. In particular, we highlighted significant clinical efficacy in patients who received >6 cycles of chemotherapy compared to those who received ≤6 cycles, with manageable toxicity profile.

Background: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment is still largely based on TKI use. Treatment adjustment due to toxicities is often needed. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of treatment modifications on the outcome of mRCC patients treated with cabozantinib or pazopanib., Research Design and Methods: This retrospective multicenter study enrolled consecutive patients receiving cabozantinib or pazopanib between January 2012 and December 2020. We evaluated the correlation of TKI treatment modifications with grade 3-4 toxicities and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We also performed a landmark analysis excluding patients who did not undergo at least 5 months of therapy., Results: Among 301 patients, 179 (59%) were treated with pazopanib, 122 (41%) with cabozantinib. Treatment modifications were related to grade 3-4 toxicities ( p  < 0.0001). We observed a statistically significant longer PFS and OS in patients who underwent dose reductions ( p  < 0.0001 for both PFS and OS), temporary interruption ( p  < 0.0001 for both PFS and OS) and schedule modifications ( p  = 0.007 for PFS and p  = 0.012 for OS) at univariate analysis. These results were confirmed at multivariable and landmark analyses., Conclusions: Tailoring treatment with pazopanib and cabozantinib was associated with better PFS/OS.

Background: Cabozantinib improves survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after prior antiangiogenics. The best treatment at disease progression (PD) is unknown. Being also a AXL/MET inhibitor, involved in acquired resistance, we hypothesized a prolonged tumor growth control in patients continuing cabozantinib despite PD., Research Design and Methods: This retrospective multicenter study enrolled patients receiving cabozantinib after the first line between 2014 and 2020. We compared patients maintaining cabozantinib after first PD due to clinical benefit and good tolerability with those who changed therapy. The postprogression survival (PPS) of both was our primary endpoint., Results: We analyzed 89 patients: 45 received cabozantinib beyond PD and 44 switched therapy. 40.4%, 31.5%, and 28.1% of patients received 1, 2, or >2 prior treatment, respectively. 84.3% were intermediate-poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database risk. Patients continuing cabozantinib showed a higher response rate to cabozantinib before PD (46.7% vs 25%, p = 0.03) and were more heavily pretreated. Continuing cabozantinib showed a significantly longer PPS compared with switching therapy (median PPS 16.9 vs 13.2 months, HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.48-0.92, p = 0.011)., Conclusions: We observed longer PPS in patients continuing cabozantinib beyond PD, suggesting that this could be an effective option.

Introduction: : The evolving therapeutic landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) includes the increasing implementation of target-therapy and immunotherapy. Lenvatinib, a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is an emerging first-line therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Its approval has changed the scenario of first-line therapies for advanced HCC, where just sorafenib proved clinical efficacy for over a decade., Areas Covered: : The current evidence on the role of lenvatinib for patients with advanced HCC is reviewed in this article. Particularly, therapeutic mechanisms and clinical efficacy of lenvatinib are summarized and the management of adverse events is discussed. In addition, future perspectives on the emerging role of combine therapy for HCC are highlighted., Expert Opinion: In the first line, lenvatinib was found to be non-inferior to sorafenib for overall survival, with significantly better progression-free survival and objective response rate. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now part of HCC treatment, and recently the combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has become the recommended standard of care first-line therapy for selected patients. The antitumor and immunomodulatory activities that lenvatinib shows in preclinical studies, and the positive outcomes achieved using a combination of lenvatinib plus ICIs, open new perspectives for advanced HCC treatment.

Introduction : Although standard doublet chemotherapy represents the upfront gold standard to increase survival and improve quality of life of gastric cancer patients, overall improvements in long-term outcomes are modest and novel treatments are urgently needed. Among these, immunotherapy is an increasingly attractive option. Areas covered : A number of clinical trials have shown that checkpoint inhibitors may be of value, but many unclear issues remain controversial and should be promptly untangled. In our short review, we offer the current available data regarding immunotherapies in gastric cancers, discuss potential limits of the reported trials, compare outcomes of checkpoints inhibitor to those of standard chemotherapy or other novel treatments, and present basic principles of immune surveillance and immune escape that may be embraced in the near future with novel drug combinations. Expert opinion : Gastric cancer patients may benefit from immunotherapy, both given alone in advanced lines and upfront in combination with chemotherapy. We believe that appropriate patients' and tumor's selection are crucial issues to maximize its potential efficacy. In addition, we think that assay standardization, biomarker agreement, and translational studies will improve the benefit-to-risk ratio of these agents in the clinical practice.

Introduction : Important changes in the treatment of prostate cancer have taken place in recent years. Non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) has been clinically delineated. In this setting, three drugs have been approved in high-risk disease: apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide. Areas covered: This manuscript aims to profile darolutamide, its clinical development, pharmacologic properties, efficacy and safety. We presented the results of published clinical studies, but we also investigated ongoing ones. Expert opinion: An indirect comparison with the other two aforementioned drugs emerged. While the clinical efficacy is comparable, the toxicity profile is different for darolutamide, resulting in greater tolerance. We must wait for the results of the trials that study darolutamide in hormone-sensitive disease, both in the metastatic phase and in the localized phase. Clinical experience will also be important to determine ever more personalized treatments for patients.

Introduction: Erdafitinib is the first orally administered pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) kinase inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)., Areas Covered: Specifically binding to FGFR family (FGFR-1 to FGFR-4), erdafitinib leads to reduced cell signaling and cellular apoptosis. Coupled with the ability to bind to vascular endothelial growth factor 2 (VEGFR-2), KIT, Fms-related tyrosine kinase 4 (FLT4), platelet-derived growth factor receptor α and β (PDGFR-α and PDGFR-β), RET and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1 R), erdafitinib has further reported antitumor features causing cell killing., Expert Opinion: In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of erdafitinib chemical structure, pharmacologic properties, and current knowledge of clinical efficacy in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. This treatment, recently approved in the U.S., is available for adult patients harboring FGFR2/FGFR3 genetic alterations who progressed within 12 months of an adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen including platinum or progressed during or after prior a chemotherapy regimen including platinum.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most important malignancies and causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Cancer stem cell markers identification could be helpful to acquire important prognostic information and develop new treatment regimens. This study aimed to evaluate the expression of OCT4 and NANOG in CRC patients and their clinical significance., Totally 359 CRC samples were stained for OCT4 and NANOG expression using tissue microarray. The correlation between their expression and clinical and pathological features was explored., The majority of CRC cases showed low-level expression of OCT4 (80%) and NANOG (75%). Lower expression of OCT4 was more often detected in CRC cases with no vascular involvement ( P = .01). Also, a trend found between low level of OCT4 expression and absence of distant metastasis or lymph node involvement ( P = .07 and P = .09, respectively). Surprisingly, a significant positive correlation was observed between NANOG expression and cellular differentiation ( P = .05). Our combined analysis demonstrated that OCT4 low /NANOG low phenotype has frequently seen in colorectal cancer cases with no vascular invasion ( P = .05)., Our observations indicated that higher expression of OCT4 and NANOG can confer malignant and aggressive behavior to CRC. Evaluation of the co-expression of these cancer stem cell markers can serve a new diagnostic and prognostic approach in CRC patients. These findings also suggested that simultaneous expression of OCT4 and NANOG can be considered as a therapeutic marker for targeted therapy of CRC, especially in advanced stages., (© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.)

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent tumors affecting the gastrointestinal tract and a universal cause of morbidity and mortality. Cabozantinib is a strong multi-inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinases approved for renal cell carcinoma that could be useful also for the treatment of HCC., Areas Covered: This review describes the chemical structure, the pharmacologic properties and current knowledge of the efficacy of cabozantinib in the treatment of HCC based on data available from first phase and later phase clinical trials. The ongoing studies testing cabozantinib, either alone or in combination with other drugs, are also described., Expert Opinion: Despite the recent achievements in the use of cabozantinib for patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma, data are still needed to allow clinicians to make better decisions on how to treat specific patient subgroups.

Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is currently a new molecular subtype of gastric cancer (GC). About 90% of GC cases appear sporadically. MSI seems to be responsible for both sporadic and familial GC. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of MSI in GC with familial history of GC., Methods: The MSI analysis was conducted using five quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide repeats: BAT-26, BAT-25, NR-24, NR-21 and NR-27. From our database, we analyzed 457 patients in terms of cancer history across family members, particularly focusing on GC., Results: MSI status in patients without familial history of GC was present in 22.1% of the cases, whereas in the patients with familial history of GC it was present in 28% of the cases (p = 0.220). For 1st or 2nd degree family members with GC, MSI was observed in 27.6% and in 30.8%, respectively (p = 0.812). MSI was observed in hereditary gastric cancer (HGC) in 33.3% and in familial gastric cancer (FGC) in 30%. No difference in survival rates was observed between the analyzed groups., Conclusions: In our publication, we could not find any link between familial background and the MSI status in GC patients. More detailed molecular and genetic analysis of subgroups of these patients is required.

Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 2-3% of all solid tumors. Expression of the receptor for the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the most common features of RCC., Areas Covered: Lenvatinib is a novel multi-kinase inhibitor that has been studied in several solid tumors. It has shown promising results in the treatment of RCC, especially when combined with everolimus, In this review, we summarize the available data of lenvatinib for the treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma., Expert Opinion: Lenvatinib in combination with everolimus has provided encouraging results in both clinical and laboratory investigations showing that blocking angiogenesis and the mTOR signalling pathway could be a remarkable approach for treating RCC. As an additive to this type of approach it would be interesting in future clinical settings testing also the combination of lenvatinib and everolimus with immune-therapy.

We analyzed the clinical utility of molecular classification based on anatomical and histological background. The study was conducted on 457 patients treated for gastric cancer with additional information about microsatellite instability status. We divided the patients in three groups of molecular classification based on anatomical and histological background: proximal non-diffused, diffused, and distal non-diffused groups. These groups varied in terms of clinical and pathological factors as well as survival rates. The molecular classification based on anatomical and histological data seems to be a useful tool in a simple classification of gastric cancer.

Angiogenesis is a key process in cancer development. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the novel VEGFR-2 inhibitors in patients with metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. A literature-based meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was undertaken. The primary outcome was the overall survival. The pooled analysis from RCTs on anti-VEGFR-2 inhibitors revealed a significant increase in overall survival (hazard ratio for death: 0.69, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.87; p = .002). This study confirms the efficacy of novel anti-VEGFR-2 inhibitors. The future studies of these agents will evaluate alone and in combination with chemotherapy the early line of treatment along with the identification of proper predictive biomarker.

Background: Several randomized phase III trials in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) showed the clinical role of new targeted agents and their impact on tumor response and outcome of whose patients affected by advanced NET. In this study, we summarize the available clinical data related to clinical efficacy of targeted therapies in the treatment of advanced NETs., Methods: A meta-analysis of randomized studies in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines was performed after searching the databases of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the ASCO University Meeting for relevant publications., Results: One thousand 9 hundred and 8 cases were included in the meta-analysis; among these, 1012 were in the experimental arm and 896 were in the control arm. The pooled analysis of the use of target agents in NETs revealed significantly increased of progression free survival compared to control group (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% CI:0.42-0.84; P = 0.003). Subgroup analysis of patients according to tumor site showed a difference in favor of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Moreover, targeted therapies improved the overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.63-0.98; P = 0.03), and response rate (hazard ratio = 3.33, 95% CI 2.02-5.49; P < 0.00001) in all types of NETs., Conclusion: Our analysis supports the routine use of targeted agents for treatment of neuroendocrine tumors with particular regards to the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Introduction: Apatinib, a small-molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, has demonstrated encouraging anti-cancer activity in gastric cancer within both in vitro and in vivo models., Areas Covered: Apatinib's efficacy, tolerability and safety have been evaluated in one Phase II and one Phase III study in metastatic/advanced gastric cancer. In this review, we focus on the mechanism of action of apatinib, its pharmacokinetic profile and its clinical activity in the treatment of advanced/metastatic gastric cancer. Expert commentary: Unfortunately, as yet, there is no definitive biomarker data for apatinib in gastric cancer.

New therapies for prostate cancer have emerged over the past three years. Nevertheless, none of these agents is curative, and unfortunately, patients often ultimately develop resistance to these agents. Therefore, the development of innovative and effective therapies that overcome these resistances is necessary. Unfortunately, the results of a phase III trial evaluating docetaxel in combination with targeted therapies demonstrated no difference in survival. Moreover, scarce data on the combination of a targeted therapy with new agents are currently available. New trials are investigating these possible combination treatments; the results of these (on-going) clinical studies are awaited.

Bevacizumab and Tamoxifen are valid therapeutic options for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients. In this report, we describe a 47 year old woman with mBC successfully treated with a maintenance therapy with Bevacizumab+Tamoxifen. A maintenance approach using 2 different drugs with different targets and mechanism of action, such as anti-angiogenic and anti-hormonal treatment is particularly intriguing because they affect different pathways involved in mBC progression. Further studies including a large number of patients are needed, in order to select women who could benefit from this maintenance approach.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common malignancy and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In this report, we describe a patient with NSCLC who was treated with continuation of Bevacizumab (Bev) beyond progression to first-line Bev-based chemotherapy. The prolonged treatment with Bev by continuing the inhibition of VEGF beyond first-progression has a strong rationale. Nevertheless, few data exist regarding the efficacy and safety of Bev beyond first line of chemotherapy progression in NSCLC patients. Further studies including a large number of patients are needed, in order to select patients who could benefit from this approach.

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men in most western countries. New agents for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) developed in the past 3 years include abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (ENZ), which inhibit signaling by and synthesis of androgens, respectively. Because they share the same target, potential clinical cross-resistance between AA and E is possible. In this review, we discuss the results of clinical studies in which CRPC patients were treated with AA and E either separately or in sequence after first-line treatment with docetaxel. Our review suggests that sequential administration of AA and E in either order has limited activity after docetaxel therapy. Prospective studies that further examine sequential treatments with AA and E are warranted.

We evaluated the changes of the tumor markers CEA and CA19.9 as early predictors of progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients participating in a clinical study and receiving chemotherapy and bevacizumab (Bev). Seventy-two patients had high baseline CEA or CA19.9 serum levels. By ROC analyses, the areas under the curves were 0.83 for variable CEA cutoff values for distinguishing progressive disease (PD) versus stable disease (SD)/partial remission (PR)/complete remission (CR), and 0.80 for variable CA19.9 cutoff values for distinguishing PD versus SD/PR/CR. Rises in CEA and CA19.9 may early signal the occurrence of progression in mCRC patients receiving chemotherapy and Bev.