Search

Objective: Brown-Vialetto-Van Laere syndrome (BVVL) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder associated with auditory neuropathy (AN). The decision process for CI in AN is evolving with increasing evidence of efficacy. We evaluated the benefit of CI in children with BVVL syndrome., Methods: A retrospective study reviewed the pre- and post-operative hearing outcomes of three patients with BVVL who presented for CI. A fourth patient with BVVL who was not suitable for CI is also discussed. The primary outcomes were hearing thresholds and auditory perception. Outcome measurement instruments included visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) or Play Audiometry (PA), Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Auditory Speech Sound Evaluation (ASSE). Secondary outcomes were parental report (BAPP questionnaire), the perception of our SaLT and compliance., Results: Patient 1 had ASSE levels of 40-45 dB HL 1 year post-operatively, and CAP score had improved from 2 to 5. At 2-year review, aided thresholds were 40 dB at 2-4 kHz. Three months following CI, the CAP score of Patient 2 had improved from 3 to 5. At 6 months, thresholds were 25-30 dB at 2-4 kHz. Single words/phrases are used by both patients and benefit is reported by both families. Patient 3 has recently undergone CI, having been previously rejected at another centre. Three months following CI, his thresholds were 35-40 dB at 2-4 kHz and increased use of sign and vocalization is reported., Conclusion: CI in children with AN complicating BVVL has a variable, but a positive effect. Other manifestations of BVVL make measuring benefit challenging, in the absence of a 'bespoke' measurement instrument for children with complex needs. This study provides further evidence for the benefit of CI in children with AN.

Congenital long QT syndrome (cLQTS) is an inherited cardiac ion channelopathy characterized by a long corrected-QT interval on the ECG, associated with a risk of syncope and sudden death as a result of arrhythmias. The archetypal arrhythmia associated with cLQTS is torsade de pointes which may degenerate into ventricular fibrillation. Children with Jervell and Lange-Neilsen syndrome have the combination of cLQTS and congenital sensorineural deafness and may present for cochlear implantation (CI). Sympathetic stimulation and administration of QT-prolonging medications may trigger arrhythmias in children with cLQTS and thus the perioperative period is a time of increased risk of adverse events, with deaths reported in the CI literature. Our Paediatric Cochlear Implant Programme had previously elected to discontinue offering CI to children with cLQTS following a perioperative death. However, subsequent demand for this service by parents led us to develop and introduce a multidisciplinary, evidence-based pathway of care. This pathway modifies the perioperative management of these children to reduce the associated risk. We present the cases of four children with cLQTS who underwent CI in our specialist children's hospital.

Objective: To assess the compliance with cochlear implantation (CI) in children subsequently diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD)., Methods: This was a retrospective case review and survey performed at a tertiary referral centre. Children meeting the criteria for CI who were implanted between 1989 and 2015 and who subsequently received a diagnosis of ASD were included. The primary outcome measure was to assess compliance with CI in children subsequently diagnosed with ASD. Secondary outcome measures included assessment of pre-CI risk factors that may have identified children at higher risk of a subsequent diagnosis of ASD, as well as the benefit obtained by these children following CI., Results: 1050 children were implanted between 1989 and 2015. Of these, 22 children were diagnosed with ASD after receiving their CI. The average age at implantation was 2.6 years (median 3, range 1-8 years). The average age for diagnosis of ASD was 5 years, approximately 2 years (median 22 months, range 2-85 months) following CI. Of these, 16/22 (712.7%) regularly use their CI. 6/22 (27.2%) children became non-users of their implant. Some degree of verbal communication was used by 13/22 (59%) of our studied group., Conclusion: There is a range of level of disabilities in ASD, with some relatively minor social communication difficulties through to severe language, cognitive, and behavioural difficulties. Compliance with CI is variable and appears to correlate with the severity of the ASD. Preoperative counselling should include information about the possible impact of later diagnosed disabilities such as ASD on performance.

Aim: To present the outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders (ANSD)., Materials and Methods: The pre- and post-CI hearing outcomes in children with ANSD were retrospectively evaluated. Performance was assessed with categories of auditory performance (CAP) and the Manchester spoken language development scale (MSLDS)., Results: Full data were available in 27 implanted children with ANSD with average age at implantation 35.4 months (range 19-68 months). Nine children were implanted bilaterally, while 13 were bimodal. The pre-CI CAP and MSLDS scores were 2.5 (range 0-5) and 2.5 (range 0-6), while the post-CI scores 5.8 (range 2-9) and 7.7 (range 3-10), respectively., Conclusions: Although the outcome of CI in children with ANSD might vary, it is favourable in most of the cases. CI seems a justified hearing rehabilitation option for children with ANSD and limited benefits from conventional hearing aids.

Objective and Importance: Jervell and Lange-Nielsen (JLN) syndrome is a rare cause of congenital profound hearing loss associated with a prolonged QT interval on the electrocardiogram. Children presenting for cochlear implantation with this condition may be asymptomatic but are at risk of sudden death. SCREENING AND SUBSEQUENT: careful management is therefore required to ensure a successful outcome. We present our experience of cochlear implantation in children with JLN syndrome, including two who died unexpectedly, and suggest a protocol for management of such cases. Clinical presentation Four cases of cochlear implantation in JLN syndrome are described. None had any previous cardiological family history. Two were diagnosed pre-operatively but, despite appropriate management under a cardiologist, died from cardiac arrest; the first in the perioperative period following reimplantation for infection, and the second unrelated to his cochlear implant surgery. The other two patients were diagnosed only subsequent to their implantation and continue to use their implants successfully., Conclusion: These cases highlight the variation in presentation of JLN syndrome, and the spectrum of disease severity that exists. Our protocol stresses the importance of careful assessment and counselling of parents by an experienced implant team.

Objective and Importance: Donnai-Barrow syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive disorder associated with severe sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Several ocular abnormalities have also been described in this syndrome, including hypertelorism, down-slanting palpebral fissures, myopia and retinal detachment. The condition is also associated with diaphragmatic hernia, exomphalos, absent corpus callosum and developmental delay. We describe the first recorded case of cochlear implantation in this rare disorder., Clinical Presentation: This case of Donnai-Barrow syndrome was identified from our paediatric cochlear implant database. A case-note review was performed identifying patient demographics, operative findings and surgical outcome. In addition, pre- and post-operative auditory and communication performance was analysed., Intervention: The child initially received a right cochlear implant at 39 months of age, but unfortunately the device failed 4 years post-operatively. Subsequently, bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation was performed. BKB scores were 98% for bilateral implant use when tested 2 years post-operatively. Individual testing revealed a score of 94% for the right ear alone, and 80% for the left. The child achieved a 100% score on sound localisation testing using 3 speakers., Conclusions: Donnai-Barrow syndrome is a rare cause of SNHL compounded by the potential for visual impairment. To our knowledge this is the first report of cochlear implantation to rehabilitate hearing loss in this condition.

This study attempts to answer the question of whether there is a 'critical age' after which a second contralateral cochlear implant is less likely to provide enough speech perception to be of practical use. The study was not designed to predict factors that determine successful binaural implant use, but to see if there was evidence to help determine the latest age at which the second ear can usefully be implanted, should the first side fail and become unusable.Outcome data, in the form of speech perception test results, were collected from 11 cochlear implant programmes in the UK and one centre in Australia. Forty-seven congenitally bilaterally deaf subjects who received bilateral sequential implants were recruited to the study. The study also included four subjects with congenital unilateral profound deafness who had lost all hearing in their only hearing ear and received a cochlear implant in their unilaterally congenitally deaf ear. Of those 34 subjects for whom complete sets of data were available, the majority (72%) of those receiving their second (or unilateral) implant up to the age of 13 years scored 60 per cent or above in the Bamford Kowal Bench (BKB) sentence test, or equivalent. In contrast, of those nine receiving their second or unilateral implant at the age of 15 or above, none achieved adequate levels of speech perception on formal testing: two scored 29 per cent and 30 per cent, respectively, and the rest seven per cent or less.A discriminant function analysis performed on the data suggests that it is unlikely that a second contralateral implant received after the age of 16 to 18 years will, on its own, provide adequate levels of speech perception. As more children receive sequential bilateral cochlear implants and the pool of data enlarges the situation is likely to become clearer.The results provide support for the concept of a 'critical age' for implanting the second ear in successful congenitally deaf unilateral cochlear implant users. This would argue against 'preserving' the second ear beyond a certain age, in order to use newer models of cochlear implant or for the purpose of hair cell regeneration and similar procedures in the future. The results suggest a new and more absolute reason for bilateral implantation of congenitally deaf children at an early age.