Search

Priority setting at intensive care units is legally regulated in accordance with the so-called ethical platform, which states that all priorities must be based on three lexically ranked principles: the principle of human dignity (a ban on discrimination, e.g. based on social standing), the principle of needs and solidarity, and the principle of cost-effectiveness. Prioritization for intensive care is particularly difficult as it requires comparisons between widely different patient categories, occurs in acute situations and is fraught with great uncertainty about the prognosis. Sometimes the degree of severity is maximal for several patients: without treatment, they die. Then treatment effect and cost-effectiveness become more decisive for prioritization decisions. Moreover, withholding and withdrawing intensive care are increasingly considered as morally equivalent. Difficult priority decisions risk moral stress among the intensive care staff.

In relation to the Swedish ethical platform for priority setting in health-care it is debated what role cost-effectiveness should play. In the article an ethical analysis is presented showing that a limited role risks leading to unequal priorities between similar needs in conflict with the human dignity and need-solidarity principles of the platform. It is also argued that resulting problems with effect comparability over different conditions and resulting equality problems with the current praxis can be mitigated through strategies like explicitly considering outcome measure and by adjusting the cost-effectiveness threshold under specific conditions.

NIPT - implentation, counselling and ethical issues It is today possible to analyze cell-free fetal DNA from a blood sample from the pregnant woman, i.e. non-invasive prenatal testing, NIPT. Thus, by a simple blood test from the mother you can detect trisomy 13, 18 and 21 in the fetus with high accuracy. However, NIPT is not a diagnostic test and a positive result should be confirmed by an invasive test, like chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. There are national guidelines from the Swedish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (SFOG) on how to implement and use NIPT for trisomies in the Swedish health care. As NIPT is only a blood test there is a risk that it is seen by the expectant parents as a routine test or as a recommendation from the health care. Pre-test counselling is therefore of great importance to enable informed choice.