Search

Purpose: Genetic instability is a hallmark of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a significant event in the tumorigenesis of many sporadic malignancies. The aim of our investigation was to study microsatellite instability in newly diagnosed glioblastomas., Methods: MSI was investigated in 109 GBMs with 15 microsatellite markers. Immunohistochemistry was performed for the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins hMLH1, hMSH2, hPMS2, and hMSH6 in cases showing MSI. Sequence and promoter methylation status of hMLH1 were analyzed in the case of a decreased hMLH1 protein expression as well. To further investigate MSI(+) GBMs we carried out studies of LOH at selected chromosome regions, EGFR amplification, and sequence of p53 and PTEN., Results: MSI was observed in six GBMs (5.5%) and it was more frequent in GBMs with a previous lower grade astrocytoma (18.8% vs. 3.2%). MMR protein staining was positive in all MSI(+) GBMs except in one case, which showed an aberrant expression of hMLH1 and hPMS2 without hMLH1 inactivation. Among MSI(+) GBMs, one tumor corresponded to the GBM molecular type 1 (p53 mutation, no EGFR amplification), another tumor to type 2 (wild-type p53, EGFR amplification), and four tumors to neither type (wild-type p53, no EGFR amplification). None of the six tumors carried a PTEN mutation., Conclusions: MSI in GBM might be caused by inactivation of minor MMR genes rather than by a deficiency of hMLH1 or hMSH2 and it appears not to play a decisive role in the pathogenesis of these tumors. MSI(+) GBMs predominantly showed a profile which included wild-type of p53 and PTEN and absence of EGFR amplification but MSI occurred in all GBM molecular subtypes.

Background: A better understanding of the molecular basis of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes such as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has profound consequences for both the diagnosis and (prophylactic) treatment of (pre)malignant neoplastic lesions., Discussion: Sequence analysis of the underlying genes for these conditions and the detection of disease-causing genetic alterations in an index patient enable predictive testing for individuals at risk within an affected family. However, the clinical implications of predictive molecular testing depend on the overall penetrance and variability in the expression of pathogenic mutations. The extent of these parameters differs considerably among the various known hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. Hence the integration of genetic information into the daily surgical practice remains challenging., Conclusions: This review provides an update on the indications for family assessment, purpose and limitations of the genetic testing and resulting recommendations for prophylactic surgery in FAP and HNPCC.

Due to different pattern of penetrance and heterogeneity, the role of prophylactic surgery must be individually defined for every hereditary cancer predisposition. For HNPCC (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) subtotal colectomy at the time of colorectal cancer diagnosis is being recommended by the Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium Recent Guidelines from the DGVS (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten) state that to date no general recommendation favouring this approach can be made. The open question is: how effective is segmental resection and endoscopic surveillance in given time intervals compared with the reduction of risk by performing extended (prophylactic) surgery. Also the issue of dealing with rectal cancer as the first primary in HNPCC patients must be addressed. In order to answer these questions and after the lessons learned from BRCA mutation carriers and prophylactic mastectomies, quality of life measurement is mandatory for this study.

Colorectal carcinomas without a family history are considered to be "sporadic" carcinomas, however, also have a genetic basis. Within the hereditary forms there are 15-50% of patients without a family history being carriers of de novo germline mutations. In addition, non-pathogenic polymorphisms in these tumorsyndrome-genes as well as in genes involved in the carcinogen metabolism (GST, NAT, CYP, MTHFR) are associated with an increased or decreased colorectal cancer risk. Identification of these genetic risk factors will enable individually tailored surveillance and recommendations for prophylaxis as well as individually tailored treatment.

Background: Principles of the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer with gene therapy evolved from the advent of techniques in molecular biology, from increasing insights into the molecular basis of tumorigenesis and from the need to develop more efficient treatment modalities. Any gene therapy approach has to take two major tasks into consideration: the therapeutic gene has to be delivered into the target cell population with high efficiency, specificity and safety, and has to act in a way that provides a benefit to the patient., Discussion: Data on 22 clinical trials on malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract are available. They utilize a variety of gene-delivery methods and target cell populations, and there is considerable variety among their strategies. Gene transfer is performed by injection of naked plasmid DNA and by use of DNA-liposome complexes and viral vectors. In some cases, the gene transfer is carried out ex vivo and the patients receive genetically modified cells, whereas other approaches deliver the vector to the target cell population in vivo. The theoretical concepts of gene therapy can be divided into three groups. One approach makes use of suicide genes comprising bacterial or viral genes that convert a nontoxic prodrug into a highly cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent at the tumor site. This approach aims at higher therapeutic specificity and fewer side effects than with the systemic delivery of cytotoxic agents. The second strategy makes an attempt to invoke the immune system to destroy malignant cells. Different strategies, such as immunization with genetically modified tumor cells or transfer of new genes to T cells, are considered to have clinical benefits. The major advantage of these immunotherapeutic approaches is the systemic effect both on the primary tumor and on metastases. The third strategy evolved from the insight that cancer is a genetic disease caused by activation of oncogenes or inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes. Compensation of genetic defects by the downregulation of activated oncogenes or the restoration of tumor-suppressor-gene functions may be able to revert the malignant phenotype of cancer cells. Of the 22 gene-therapy trials, 17 trials focus on immunotherapy. Only two trials make use of suicide genes and, in three trials, a functional copy of the p53 tumor-suppressor gene was reintroduced into malignant cells. Modalities for gene transfer and the strategies underlying gene therapy will be discussed in the context of gastrointestinal malignancies and the potential benefits for patients.

Because of the accomplishments in biotechnical research in the past few decades our knowledge about the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis has grown rapidly. Colorectal cancer has been one of the most intensively investigated tumor entities, and it seems to be well established that colorectal tumor growth is associated with an accumulation of acquired somatic mutational events in tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. Recent progress in our understanding of the molecular basis of the most prevalent colorectal cancer syndromes, such as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), is reflected by modifications in diagnosis and therapy. Identification and characterization of the causative genes for these colorectal cancer syndromes have enabled precise presymptomatic detection of mutations in individuals who bear an a priori risk of about 50% of developing colorectal cancer. Genotype-phenotype correlations might further increase the clinical management of hereditary colorectal cancer. Even though developments in cancer research are restricted to the minority of individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes, growing knowledge about the effect of low penetrance variations in tumor suppressor genes may affect the diagnosis and therapy of sporadic colorectal cancer.

The Human Genome Project is an international effort to discover all 80,000 genes of the human genome and to determine the complete sequence of the three billion basepairs of the human DNA. Chromosome mapping enables fragmentation of large DNA pieces, sequencing of the resulting small fragments and realignment in the order in which they originally occurred in the chromosomes. Identification of genes involved in various benign and malignant diseases will lead to the understanding of their action and will result in prevention-based medical approaches. In addition, novel therapeutic regimens will be devised based on human gene products. Decipherment of the genetic programs of embryogenesis will enable regeneration of various tissues without the formation of scars.

We analyzed the complete coding region with adjacent intron sequences of the BRCA1 gene in eight patients with hereditary and/or early-onset breast/ovarian cancer. We detected one germline mutation in exon 5 in a 35-year-old woman with early-onset breast and ovarian cancer and 10 polymorphisms, of which one has not been published so far. To determine whether certain BRCA1 polymorphisms are associated with an increased risk for breast cancer, we will compare genotype distributions of early-onset breast cancer populations with matched controls.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in Western populations, striking both women and men at approximately equal rates. A genetic basis for the development of cancer has already been suggested by Karl Heinrich Bauer in 1928 but only since the advancement of molecular biology direct evidence has been obtained to support the notion that cancer is a genetic disease. Recent progress in our understanding of the molecular basis of the most prevalent colorectal cancer syndromes, such as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), is reflected by modifications in diagnosis and therapy. Identification of genetic risk factors for the development of adenomas and associated carcinomas of the colon and rectum results in predictive molecular diagnosis of malignant disease and enables preventive treatment.

Thirteen families were included in our HNPCC surveillance program, eight of which met strict and three incomplete Amsterdam criteria. Two index patients were younger than 35 years of age. Tumors of all index persons showed microsatellite instabilities in at least 50% of the ten markers studied. Immunohistochemical analysis of tumor sections was performed using antibodies against hMLH1 and hMSH2 proteins in order to identify the mutated gene, which is not expressed in the tumor. Coding regions of hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA and sequenced. In nine families pathogenetic mutations all resulting in a truncated protein, could be identified. Furthermore, 21 intron and exon polymorphisms were found. Since July 1997 we have offered surgical and genetic counseling to families with hereditary cancer syndromes in a special outpatient clinic. In addition to 13 index patients three asymptomatic gene carriers were included and eight noncarriers were excluded from the HNPCC surveillance program, as recommended by the HNPCC study group of Germany. Molecular diagnosis has considerable clinical implication in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families with respect to family members who actually have the disease as well as gene carriers and noncarriers.