Search

Introduction: Recent reports of cases of malignant mesothelioma (MM) in "non-traditional" areas of employment are an indication of the numerous occasions in which exposure to asbestos has occurred in the workplace. We describe an unusual case of occupational exposure to asbestos to stress the importance of careful history taking when assessing a patient's work history, especially in generic occupations in which there is apparently no exposure to asbestos., Case Report: Malignant mesothelioma was diagnosed in a woman worker employed in a factory making rice starch. She had worked in the storehouse of the factory for approximately 40 years. From circumstantial interviews with relatives and workmates, it emerged that her job involved retrieving, for re-use, the jute sacks in which the rice was transported. More than one source remembered distinctly that some of the sacks had "Asbestos" written on the outside., Discussion: This case provides further confirmation of the importance of careful history taking among workers with mesothelioma to avoid failing to diagnose occupational disease. It also highlights the risk of asbestos exposure represented by recycling asbestos-contaminated sacks in both occupational and non-occupational settings.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of the specific inhalation challenge test (SIC) in 160 subjects with suspected baker's asthma and to assess its relation to total flour dust levels and to personal characteristics such as specific skin sensitisation, non-specific bronchial hyper-responsiveness (NSBH) and atopy., Methods: We investigated the outcome of SIC tests performed with wheat flour in six Italian laboratories. For each subject, data was available regarding skin sensitisation to wheat flour, NSBH, atopy, forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) monitoring and airborne flour dust in the challenge chamber measured by the gravimetric method (total dust in mg/m(3))., Results: The SIC test was positive for early asthma in 42 subjects (26%) and for late/dual asthma in 18 (11%). Positive outcome to SIC was significantly associated with NBSH (odds ratio, OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1. 6-7.7) and skin sensitisation to wheat flour (OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.3-7. 0). Exposure level to wheat flour was less than or equal to 10 mg/m(3 )in 12% of individuals, ranged between 11 and 30 mg/m(3) in 43% and exceeded 30 mg/m(3) in 45%. The outcome of SIC was always negative among workers not skin sensitised to wheat flour and without NSBH and atopy. An increasing prevalence of positive SIC was observed among workers with one or more of the above-mentioned personal characteristics whose challenge exposure was greater than 10 mg/m(3) (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Procedures currently adopted for wheat flour dust exposure during SIC need to be better standardised in order to avoid excessive airborne dust exposure. Over-exposure seems to be of no use for the diagnosis and risks making the asthmatic reaction worse, particularly in patients who are both sensitised to wheat allergens and have NSBH and/or atopy.

The authors report on pollution measures in some operating theatres and consider biological data for the hepatic and hemopoietic functions in operating room personnel and in control groups. Waste gas concentrations range from 17.3 to 22.6 ppm for enfluorane and from 500 to 1275 for N2O in theatres not equipped with antipollution systems. Pollution is 3-8 times lower when a scavenging system is present, while with horizontal laminar air flow exhaust in function, the gas concentration in the air is insignificant. Tests for the hepatic and hematological functions, done on 61 operating room personnel, 87 ward nurses, and 69 technicians and physicians of radiology services, do not show any significant difference between those exposed to anesthetic gases and controls.

Dock workers (n = 218) occupationally exposed to green coffee beans (GCB) were studied, using a specific questionnaire for allergic symptoms and skin tests for common and occupational allergens. Thirty-one workers (14.3%) complained of allergic symptoms of the eye, nose and bronchial system at the workplace. The prick tests, using both commercial allergens and specific extracts prepared from the most common types of coffee and their corresponding sacks, confirmed a sensitization in 21 workers (9.6%). A positive skin reaction to castor beans (CB) was found in nearly all these cases; in ten workers there was also a positive reaction to GCB allergens and in 14 cases prick tests were positive to extracts of sacks. There was a good concordance between prick tests and specific IgE for CB (95.0%) and also, but to a lesser extent, for GCB. The authors concluded that there is a significant risk of sensitization to CB and GCB allergens in dock workers occupied in handling green coffee bean, despite the fact that the exposure is not continuous. CB emerged as a common contaminant of GCB from various countries. For effective prevention, a modification of the methods of transport is required to avoid CB contamination to other products. Eliminating environmental dust during shipping operations is the most important preventive measure and it can be achieved by the use of containers, as some exporting countries are already doing.

Air-lead levels (PbA) and biological indices were studied in three ceramic factories (185 workers altogether). A difference in the pattern of lead exposure was found in the largest factory (A) and the other two smaller factories (B and C). PbA never exceeded 67 micrograms/m3 in factory A, but reached values as high as 378 micrograms/m3 in factory B. 19% of PbB values were higher than 40 micrograms/100 ml in factory A, 63% in factory B and 35% in factory C. As was expected, a closer analysis of the jobs confirmed a higher exposure level in people directly in contact with lead glazes (glazers and kiln operators). In factories B and C, however, there was also a significant lead uptake in selection and maintenance staff, who worked in areas at some distance from the glazing lines. This may be due in part to pollution spread over all departments, but also to the lack of hygiene and washing facilities whose importance is stressed for effective prevention. Biological monitoring is suggested as being useful for all workers, whatever the lead-air level, bearing in mind the possibility of lead intake orally through soiling.