Search

Due to the current COVID-19 pandemic there is a need for a rapid increase in intensive care and ventilation capacities. Delivery times for additional intensive care respirators are currently not foreseeable. An option to increase ventilation capacities not only for COVID-19, but for all patients requiring mechanical ventilation is to use home respirators. Home respirators are turbine respirators, so they can usually be operated without high-pressure oxygen connections and can therefore also be used in areas outside the classical intensive care medical infrastructure. Due to their limited technical features, home respirators are not suitable for the treatment of severely affected patients but can be used for weaning after respiratory improvement, which means that intensive care respirators are available again more quickly. Respiratory therapists are specially trained nurses or therapists in the field of out of hospital ventilation and can independently use home ventilation respirators, for example for weaning in the intensive care unit. Thus, they relieve intensive care nursing staff in the pandemic. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic medical students from the Oldenburg University are currently being trained in operating home respirators to provide basic support in the hospital if necessary.

In 2019 the annual conference of the scientific working group on obstetric anesthesiology of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) took place in the usual manner. Emergency situations, such as the challenge of a preclinical birth or the recognition and treatment of an amniotic fluid embolism were discussed. In addition, topics on the correct treatment of a female patient with a known addictive disorder were of great interest as well as the discussion on the question when a transfusion should be performed in postpartum anemia and which risks accompany the increasing prevalence of obesity, especially during pregnancy. A further hot topic was the deliberation on the prevalence and differential diagnostic clarification of neurological complications after epidural anesthesia. In connection with the topic of birth, exciting and practice relevant topics for all anesthetists confronted with this field were presented and discussed. The essential aspects are summarized in this article.

A 13-month-old infant was admitted to hospital approximately 3 weeks after ingestion of a button battery, which was lodged in the esophagus and had caused a tracheoesophageal fistula requiring mechanical ventilation. Since the battery had partially penetrated into the tracheal lumen just above the carina and also was in direct contact with the pulmonary artery, extensive considerations regarding airway and circulatory management were required preoperatively, which are presented and discussed in this case report.

In 1985 Mallampati et al. published a non-invasive score for the evaluation of airways (Mallampati grading scale, MGS), which originally consisted of only three different classes and has been modified several times. At present it is mostly used in the version of Samsoon and Young consisting of four different classes. Class I: soft palate, fauces, uvula, palatopharyngeal arch visible, class II: soft palate, fauces, uvula visible, class III: soft palate, base of the uvula visible and class IV: soft palate not visible. Nevertheless, other versions of MGS still exist, each having different values for sensitivity and specification. The current opinion is therefore that MGS is no longer useful as a stand-alone predictor but in combination with others it is still part of today's most relevant guidelines, such as those of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), the UK's Difficult Airway Society (DAS), the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and must therefore be known by anesthetists. Even in times of sophisticated tools for airway management, the procedure remains a high risk, so every anesthetist has to be prepared for and well trained in management of known and unexpected difficult airways. Evaluation of the patient's airway is a part of modern airway management to prevent problems and reduce risk of hypoxia during the procedure. The theoretical knowledge and practical skills of European anesthetists were evaluated at two international congresses, the German Anesthesia Congress (DAC) and Euroanaesthesia 2014. The DAC is an annual meeting of German speaking anesthetists, hosted by the DGAI. The Euroanaesthesia is the annual European pendant hosted by the ESA. Participation was voluntary and only physicians were allowed to take part. Theory was evaluated by a questionnaire containing open and closed questions for MGS that had to be answered by every participant alone. Apart from theory, a practical evaluation was performed. Every participant had to classify the MGS of a human airway model. The model was identical on both congresses. According to the original publication a checklist containing the factors essential for the correct performance was filled out by a supervising experienced anesthetist. During DAC 2014 n = 267 physicians participated in the study, 22 participants were excluded due to inconsistent answers, incomplete questionnaires or missing practical part. A total of 245 data sets were evaluated. During Euroanaesthesia 2014 n = 298 physicians participated in the study, 68 participants were excluded due to inconsistent answers, incomplete questionnaires or missing practical part and 230 data sets were evaluated. At the DAC the mean age (± SD) was 44.5 ± 9.5 years, 157 (64.1%) were male and 88 (35.9%) were female. Working experience was trainee anesthetist in 16.7% and other participants were experienced anesthetists. At the ESA the mean age (± SD) was 42.4 ± 9.5 years, 133 (57.8%) were male and 97 (42.2%) female. Trainee anesthetists were 15.2%, the rest were experienced anesthetists. The DAC participants knew Mallampati classes 1 (65%) and 4 (45%) better than 2 and 3 and there was no relevant differences to the ESA (close to 30% knew the classes 1-4 here). Classification of the airway model was correct in 62% and 67% at DAC and ESA, respectively. Most participants performed the practical evaluation correctly except the sitting position of the model. In agreement with earlier studies, these results show the lack of knowledge in evaluation of airways according to current guidelines of all relevant societies. This is likely to increase preventable risks for patients as unexpected difficult airway management increases the risk for hypoxia and intubation damage.

An important challenge in learning ultrasound-assisted interventions, such as pericardiocentesis, is the navigation of the needle in a three-dimensional space on the basis of a two-dimensional image. In order to learn this in vitro realistic simulators are required. We manufactured a model which allows simulation of pericardiocentesis on the basis of ballistic gelatin (12.6%, 250 Bloom). Furthermore, the pericardiocentesis model was subjectively evaluated by 37 anesthetists in a pre-post design. The models used proved to be technically simple to manufacture, hard wearing and realistic. They are therefore regularly used in our hospitals to learn ultrasound-assisted interventions.

Predicting and managing the difficult airway is a lifesaving and vital basic task for the anesthetist. Current guidelines of all important societies include thyromental distance (TMD, "Patil") as a possible predictor for a difficult airway and includes two important aspects for airway management: the mandibular space and the flexibility of the cervical spine. We evaluated knowledge and execution regarding TMD for predicting a difficult airway on participants at the Euroanaesthesia (ESA) congress and German Anaesthesia Congress (DAC) in 2014. Our evaluation consisted of a theoretical part with questions regarding general knowledge and a practical evaluation with anesthetists performing on a human airway model. Practical evaluations were performed separately from other participants. During the DAC 245 (ESA 230) physicians participated, of which 64% were male (ESA 58%). At the DAC 182 (74.3%) and ESA 82 (35.6%) participants knew about Patil/TMD. Its use as a predictive score for a difficult airway was known by 122 (49.8%; DAC) and 79 (34.4%; ESA) participants. The correct definition for intubation was given by 45 (25.7%) at the DAC and 56 (24.3%) at ESA. Only 40-41% of the participants measured the correct distance for TMD. Only 6.1-6.5% completed both the theoretical and practical parts correctly. As non-invasive TMD includes two different aspects of patient airways and is part of current guidelines, education and training must be extended to assure adequate evaluation in the future.

Background: According to the recent guidelines supraglottic airways, such as laryngeal tubes are recommended to ensure oxygenation in patients with unexpected difficult airways. The novel Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable (iLTS-D) is a modified laryngeal tube designed for secondary tracheal intubation. This pilot study evaluated the use of the iLTS-D in clinical practice with respect to practicality and efficacy., Methods: In this study the airways of 30 consecutive adult patients with no evidence of a difficult airway undergoing elective ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery were managed with the iLTS-D. After induction of anesthesia the iLTS-D was placed in position and checked for correct ventilation. Following muscle relaxation, endotracheal intubation through the iLTS-D was performed under continuous visualization using a flexible bronchoscope. Finally, the iLTS-D was removed leaving the endotracheal tube in place. Data were collected anonymously as part of a quality assurance program. Publication of the data was approved by the institutional review board., Results: Initial iLTS-D placement took a median of 17 s (range 12-90 s) and provided sufficient ventilation in all patients; however, the position of the iLTS-D needed to be adjusted in four patients. Endotracheal intubation through the iLTS-D was achieved in 29 out of 30 patients at the first attempt (n = 23) or after 2 attempts (n = 6) and the median time required for intubation was 32 s (range 18-187 s). In five patients no laryngeal structures could initially be identified by bronchoscopy. Blind endotracheal intubation through the iLTS-D was performed in two cases and in two other patients the endotracheal tube was also blindly advanced but into the esophagus. After removal of the endotracheal tube and repositioning of the iLTS-D, successful tracheal intubation was subsequently achieved under bronchoscopic vision. The procedure was aborted and uneventful conventional intubation using direct laryngoscopy was carried out in one patient. The median time for removal of the iLTS-D after successful intubation was 20 s (range 15-80 s). Minor blood stains on the iLTS-D were observed in three patients. With one exception, all problems and adverse events occurred during the first 10 patients., Conclusion: This first clinical study demonstrated that in patients with apparently normal airways and in the hands of users without previous experience, the iLTS-D allowed sufficient ventilation in all patients and had a high success rate for subsequent endotracheal intubation. The results are, however, preliminary until confirmed by further studies, particularly in patients with difficult airways.

Since the publication of the first German guidelines on airway management in 2004 new techniques have been established in the clinical routine and new insights into existing strategies have been published. As a consequence the new guidelines on airway management of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine represent the current state of scientific knowledge and integrate the currently recommended techniques and strategies. The aim of these guidelines is to guarantee an optimal care of patients undergoing anesthesiological procedures and serve as an orientation and decision aid for users.

In February 2013 the Committee of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Task Force published the amended version of the "Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway" which replace the recommendations from 2003. The amended version re-evaluated the recommendations from 2003 in 2011, evaluated recently published studies and recommendations and included them in the new practice guidelines. In particular, new technical developments, such as the recently established video-assisted intubation procedure were taken into consideration. Despite the many publications in the field of airway management the evidence resulting from the data obtained from recent publications is so low that the new information does not necessitate any amendments to the existing guidelines. In short, the current guidelines basically correspond to the previous version published 10 years ago but are, however, more than twice as extensive. This article summarizes and comments on the cornerstones of the guidelines.

Background: Securing the airway with supraglottic airway devices, such as a laryngeal tube, is a regular component of most difficult airway management algorithms. It is further recommended that in emergency medicine rescuers less skilled in endotracheal intubation should use supraglottic airways as a first line device. Exchanging the laryngeal tube with an endotracheal tube can be performed with video-assisted laryngoscopy as described below., Material and Methods: A total of 20 adult patients with airways managed using laryngeal tubes due to actual or anticipated difficult intubation underwent endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC videolaryngoscope. After deflating the cuffs of the laryngeal tube, seeking out the glottis was done by following the constructional landmarks of the laryngeal tube, considering concordance with anatomical landmarks of the human airway. In cases of failed video-assisted endotracheal intubation, the laryngeal tube that was still in situ was reinflated to re-establish ventilation of the lungs., Results: In 19 out of the 20 patients the laryngeal tube could be exchanged for an endotracheal tube with the video-assisted technique described. In one patient no laryngeal structures could be identified (Cormack and Lehane grade IV) even with the C-MAC videolaryngoscope and ventilation was continued via the laryngeal tube. No complications related to the video-assisted intubation technique were observed., Conclusions: The C-MAC videolaryngoscope is a mobile system which facilitates endotracheal intubation in patients with a difficult airway and a laryngeal tube in place. It is not only possible but recommended to leave the laryngeal tube in situ as a back-up when videolaryngoscopy fails.

Background: The goal of the present study was to evaluate the publication rate of abstracts presented during the German Anesthesia Congress (Deutscher Anästhesiecongress, DAC) and the meeting of the European Society of Anesthesiologists (ESA) in the years 2000 and 2005 in Medline listed journals (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed). In addition, the respective impact factors of the journals in which the articles were published were evaluated (http://www.isiknowledge.com)., Methods: All abstracts of free papers and posters presented at the DAC and ESA from the years 2000 and 2005 were included into the study. The presence of authors and the topics of abstracts in the literature were analyzed by a Medline based inquiry over a time period of 5 years. The search was based on the last name and initials of authors and when these could not be identified in Medline the search was extended by keywords of relevant topics of the abstract. Umlauts "ä/ö/ü" were replaced by "ae/oe/ue" and "ß" was replaced by "ss". Only original papers were included in this analysis. Once an original paper was found the impact factor of the journal in that year was identified., Results: A total of 465 abstracts from the DAC 2000, 378 abstracts from the DAC 2005, 644 abstracts from the ESA 2000 and 720 abstracts from the ESA 2005 were included. Of the abstracts from the DAC 2000, 183 (39%) were published in Medline listed journals, 179 (47%) from DAC 2005, 218 (34%) from ESA 2000 and 233 (32%) from ESA 2005. The ESA abstracts were published in English more often than the DAC abstracts (ESA 2000: 95%; ESA 2005: 95%; DAC 2000: 78%; DAC 2005: 86%). While the publication rate after the ESA remained nearly unchanged between 2000 and 2005, the publication rate after the DAC increased by about 7%. The average impact factors of the publications were 1.777 (DAC 2000), 2.836 (DAC 2005), 1.825 (ESA 2000) and 2.36 (ESA 2005). Independent of the congress (DAC or ESA) where the abstract was presented, most articles were published in the journal Anesthesia & Analgesia., Conclusion: In the year 2005 more abstracts of the DAC were published in Medline listed papers than in 2000. When comparing the number of abstracts published in Medline listed journals, more abstracts of the DAC were published compared to abstracts of the ESA. The increase in papers written in English after abstract presentation on the DAC is mostly due to the wider readership which can be reached with manuscripts in the English language. Besides a larger readership, English journals often also have a higher ranked impact factor. This analysis does not claim to be a complete registration of all published abstracts due to the limitation on Medline listed journals and publications in other journals were not rated. Medline was selected because of the widespread and international use of this database.

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting increasingly show severe co-morbidities, which can negatively affect the outcome. Recent developments in cardiac surgery have therefore focused on minimizing the invasiveness of the procedure by revascularization on the beating heart without cardiopulmonary bypass, and by reducing surgical trauma using smaller surgical incisions. Progress in minimally invasive cardiac surgery has led to minimally invasive anesthesia, i.e. using high thoracic epidural anesthesia as the sole technique in the conscious patient (awake coronary artery bypass grafting, ACAB). Published data on ACAB procedures in smaller cohorts have demonstrated that the procedure is safe. Significant complications occurred in 7.1% of patients. A particular cause of concern during ACAB surgery is the development of spinal epidural hematoma the risk of which has been estimated to be as high as 1:1,000. A thorough risk-benefit analysis has therefore to be made. Currently, ACAB surgery remains limited to few specialized centers and highly selected patients.

The value of laparoscopic procedures has increased over the last decade. Many patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery also have coexisting diseases. The hemodynamic effects of intraperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation depend on the extent of intraperitoneal pressure, severity of preexisting cardiopulmonary diseases, volume state of the patient and alterations of acid-base balance due to a capnoperitoneum. In addition to endocrinologic reactions, patient positioning also affects hemodynamic parameters. In high risk patients extended cardiopulmonary monitoring with an arterial line and repeated blood gas analysis is recommended intraoperatively, in addition to assessment of end-expiratory CO(2). In this patient group the intra-abdominal pressure should be maintained in the range of 5-7 mmHg.

As one major link in the chain of survival, early transthoracic (external) cardiac defibrillation is aimed at the termination of ventricular flutter and ventricular fibrillation. Most important to the success of defibrillation is the passage of a defined amount of current through a critical mass of heart muscle. Different transthoracic resistances reduce the effective density of the current within the heart. As for other therapeutic intervention procedures, recommendations for the optimal strength of current to be applied to the fibrillating heart need to be evaluated and defined for therapeutical defibrillation too. Unnecessarily high current density causes damage to the heart and should be prevented. By using biphasic waveforms in contrast to monophasic impulses, the amount of current can be reduced but the same or even higher efficacy is attained. Therefore possible myocardial damage might be clearly reduced. Even with individually altered thoracic impedance effective conversion of cardiac rhythm can be achieved by device-controlled compensation and biphasic waveforms. According to their different mechanisms or origin (electrically induced or spontaneously caused by organic heart disease) the probability of successful conversion of the cardiac rhythm by one single electrical impulse varies. The optimum point in time for defibrillation during resuscitation needs to be redefined. In order to improve comparability, further studies should use standardized definitions for successful defibrillation relating to the resulting cardiac rhythm.

Objective: High thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) combined with general anesthesia is increasingly being used for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with extracorporeal circulation. Recent developments in beating heart techniques have rendered the use of TEA alone in conscious patients possible and have been reported for single-vessel beating heart CABG via lateral thoracotomy. For multi-vessel revascularization the heart is usually approached via median sternotomy, therefore the use of TEA alone was applied in awake patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease who underwent CABG via median sternotomy., Methods: A total of 10 patients scheduled for awake coronary artery bypass grafting (ACAB) received TEA via an epidural catheter placed at T1/2 or T2/3. Total arterial myocardial revascularization was performed after median sternotomy. In addition to standard monitoring, anesthetic sensory and motor block levels were determined using an epidural scoring scale for arm movements (ESSAM)., Results: Except for one patient who required intraoperative endotracheal intubation due to a pneumothorax, all patients were awake and maintained spontaneous breathing during the entire procedure. Compared to baseline values, hemodynamic parameters, e.g. arterial blood pressure (SAP, MAP, DAP) and heart rate significantly declined during coronary anastomosis. No significant hypercarbia was observed. The intraoperative pain level was subjectively estimated by the patients as less than 20 out of 100 (median 10.95% confidence interval 4.2-21.6) using a visual analogue scale. All patients rated TEA as "good" or "excellent." Adverse effects associated with TEA were not observed., Conclusions: We could demonstrate that the use of TEA alone for CABG via median sternotomy was feasible and produced good results. High patient satisfaction in our small and highly selected cohort could be reported. Nevertheless, randomized controlled trials in large cohorts are mandatory to definitively evaluate the role of TEA alone in cardiac surgery.