Search

Two cases of unsuccessful hydrostatic reduction of intussusception are reported. Both were associated with barium filling multiple loops of distal ileum, despite lack of complete reduction of the intussusception. The presence of free ileal reflux does not guarantee successful reduction. Careful examination of the cecum for residual intussusceptum and of non-contrast-filled small-bowel loops for evidence of remaining small-bowel obstruction is essential to recognize unsuccessful reduction.

It has been frequently stated that barium enema has no value in the treatment of cecal volvulus. We present a patient with cecal volvulus who was effectively treated by barium enema; however, multiple studies were required to achieve optimal results. In a subset of patients with cecal volvulus, laparotomy may be avoided by the use of barium enema.

Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception by barium or air enema has been widely accepted. The five-year experience with this procedure at two children's hospitals is reviewed and the results compared to previous studies. Various clinical and radiographic factors are evaluated in relation to the reduction rate. The findings show that the more distal the intussusception is encountered, the lower the rate of reduction. However, 25% are reduced within the rectum with no evidence of increased complications. Small bowel obstruction and prolonged duration of signs and symptoms decreased the rate of reduction statistically but there is no significant increase in complication rate in those attempted, contrary to a previous report. The cresent sign (dissection sign) and age of the patient are not significant factors in reduction as reported by other studies.

Efforts to improve the non-surgical management of childhood intussusception centre around (a) reassessment of selection criteria used to ensure as many children as possible have the advantage of hydrostatic reduction, and (b) improvements and modifications of enema technique to ensure successful and safe reductions without increased morbidity. Reports that pneumatic reduction was highly successful in treating childhood intussusception prompted the authors to evaluate this technique over an 18 month period using our previously reported technique of oxygen at 2 litres/minute and a pressure of 80 mm Hg. Pneumatic reduction was attempted in 114 of 129 consecutive cases of intussusception, and was successful in 85 (75%). Fifteen patients (8.6%) were considered unacceptable risks for gas reduction using our current selection criteria and had primary surgery. The overall success rate considering all cases of intussusception managed at our institution over this period was 66% (85/129). As with any form of hydrostatic reduction, pneumatic reduction of intussusception requires careful selection of patients, meticulous technique, and awareness of complications and their appropriate management. Because of its simplicity and improved success rate, pneumatic reduction has replaced traditional barium reduction at our institution. It may be that with further evaluation of selection criteria, higher pressures, and prolonged attempts that results will improve further.