1. Cost-Effectiveness of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Treating Below-the-Knee Arteries in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: The SINGA-PACLI Trial.
- Author
-
Sivapragasam N, Matchar DB, Zhuang KD, Patel A, Pua U, Win HH, Chandramohan S, Venkatanarasimha N, Chua JME, Tan GWL, Irani FG, Leong S, Tay KH, Chong TT, and Tan BS
- Subjects
- Humans, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Popliteal Artery, Angioplasty, Ischemia therapy, Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, Angioplasty, Balloon adverse effects
- Abstract
Purpose: Drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) has been studied as a potentially superior option compared to conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in treating below-the-knee (BTK) arteries in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The aim of this study is to examine the cost-effectiveness of DCBA versus PTA in BTK arteries based on a randomized controlled trial., Material and Methods: A prospective economic study was embedded in a randomized controlled trial of 138 patients with CLTI. Resource use and health outcomes were assessed at baseline, and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-intervention. Costs were calculated from a societal perspective and health outcomes measured using quality-adjusted life years with probabilistic sensitivity analysis performed to account for subject heterogeneity., Results: Compared with participants randomized to receive PTA, participants randomized to DCBA gained an average baseline-adjusted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of .012 while average total costs were USD$1854 higher; this translates to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$154,500 additional cost per QALY gained. However, the estimate of ICER had substantial variance with only 48% of bootstrap ICERs meeting a benchmark threshold of US$57,705 (the average gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of Singapore)., Conclusion: The use of DCBA in BTK arteries in CLTI patients was not cost-effective compared with PTA., Level of Evidence: 2, Randomized trial., (© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF