Search

Purpose: This study was performed to assess the practical laparoscopic training in Gynecological Endoscopy Working Group (AGE) certified Training Centers (TC) and evaluate the possible implementation for a manual dexterity skills-training within the Minimal Invasive Surgery (MIC) certification process., Material and Methods: An online questionnaire was developed and the link provided for the heads of the AGE TC. The questionnaire comprised topics on TC organization, practical training performance and perspectives for future training and demographic data., Results: Response rate was 78.9% (15/19) of AGE TC. Grasping for the basic and suturing exercises for the advanced curricula, respectively, are thought to be of highest value (each 1.0 ± 0, on a scale from 1 = very valuable to 6 = not at all valuable). Most valuable parameter in assessing training was thought to be pressure/tension with 1.80 ± 1.08 The most valuable training capacity was considered for box training under supervision (1.27 ± 0.59) and feed-back box training with direct evaluation of various surgical skills (1.40 ± 0.63). Supervised box training was also thought to have the most positive influence on surgical performance (1.33 ± 0.49). The majority of respondents (86.7%) were qualified with the highest MIC certification and additional 66.7% were sub-specialized Gynecological Oncologists., Conclusion: The AGE certified TC offer a structured curriculum with emphasis on practical training. The results of this questionnaire and the additional respondents comments on value and future perspectives/changes of practical training support the concept and the implementation of a skills-training to the AGE MIC concept.

Purpose: The purpose of this survey was to assess the opinions of members of the German Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy (AGE) regarding the laparoscopic treatment of ovarian malignancies and current practice at their institutions., Methods: Between February and October 2015, the AGE sent an anonymous online survey via mail to its members. The questionnaire solicited participants' opinions about the laparoscopic treatment of ovarian cancers according to T stage and borderline tumors, and information about current practice at their institutions. Participants were also asked their opinions on currently available data on this issue., Results: Of 228 AGE members who completed the survey, 132 (58%) were fellows or attending physicians and 156 (68%) worked at university hospitals or tertiary referral centers. Most [212 (93%)] respondents stated that < 10% of all ovarian cancer cases were currently treated laparoscopically at their institutions. Most participants indicated that T1 (a, b, c) tumors [145 (64%)] and ovarian borderline tumors [206 (90%)], but not T2 [48 (21%)] or T3/4 [9 (4%) ovarian tumors] should or could be treated laparoscopically. One hundred seventy-two (75%) participants considered currently available data on this topic to be insufficient and 152 (66%) stated that they would take part in a clinical trial assessing a laparoscopic approach to T1/2 ovarian cancer., Conclusion: According to this survey, to the opinion of the majority of AGE members, laparoscopy might be a considerable option for the treatment of early ovarian malignancies and borderline tumors and should be evaluated further in future studies.

Introduction: Endoscopic techniques have successfully reduced the invasiveness of hysterectomy, when compared to open procedures. Power morcellation, as a part of the minimal invasive concept, carries the risk of disseminating cells from the tissue specimen. The present observational study reports on first experiences using a new system (More-Cell-Safe, A.M.I., Austria) for contained in-bag morcellation during laparoscopic hysterectomy., Materials and Methods: The dual opening system allows two-port access without bag puncture. The optic is protected against spread cell contamination with a disposable sleeve. Application data were prospectively recorded on the first n = 7 consecutive patients and compared to n = 7 preceding patients undergoing uncontained morcellation., Results: Bag system use was surgically successful in 6 of 7 cases (85.7 %). Morcellated specimen weight ranged from 205 to 638 g (mean 413.33 ± 176.85; median 413). In one patient, the uterine specimen (1050 g) proved too large to be placed into the bag. Average time associated to the bag use was 16.2 ± 7.65 min, ranging from 8.5 to 26.5 min (median 14 min). Removed bags contained bloody fluid with residual tissue fragments weighing overall between 21 and 85 g. Spread spindle cells were detected in two cases after uncontained morcellation, but not after in-bag morcellation., Conclusion: The experiences from our small pilot series prove technical feasibility in the clinical setting.

Introduction: Minimal invasive approaches have proven beneficial for patients undergoing myomectomy and hysterectomy, but necessary tissue morcellation carries the risk of cell dissemination in rare cases of inadvertent malignancy. Performing the morcellation process within a contained bag system may prevent spilling and therefore enhance safety of the laparoscopic procedures., Material and Methods: The present study describes the development and experimental evaluation of a new bag system in vitro and in vivo in a pig model of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies., Results: The main results on n = 8 procedures with in-bag morcellation compared to n = 8 controls without bag indicate reproducible feasibility and protective effect of the new bag, which is the first published to our knowledge that does not require puncturing in a standard multiport laparoscopy setting. Overall surgery time was significantly prolonged in the bag group by 12.86 min (P = 0.0052; 95 % confidence interval 4.64-21.07), but peritoneal washings were negative for muscle cells in all cases with bag use, compared to positive cytology in 5/8 cases without bag (P = 0.0256)., Conclusion: Clinical trials will now be necessary to investigate the reproducibility of these encouraging data in human application.

Aim: Our goal was to evaluate risks and complication rate of uterine fibroid embolization (UFE)., Results: The most frequent complications reported in the literature are associated with angiography procedure, serious complications are extremely infrequent., Conclusion: The embolization of fibroids is a safe angiographic intervention. Nevertheless, the interventional radiologist must be aware of the common risks and complication and the strategies to avoid them.