Search

Question: To what extent does the scientific literature have an impact on current clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in trauma surgery?, Methods: We searched for CPGs on the initial management of multiply injured patients and assessed the quality of literature search and appraisal within these CPGs. Secondly, we compiled a list of all medical journal with relevance to prehospital trauma care. Lastly, we performed a hand search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in some of the German not in Medline indexed traumatological journals., Results: We identified 22 CPGs of varying methodological quality. The American guidelines scored highest. Only 21 of the 38 journals (55%) in the field of prehospital trauma surgery were indexed in Medline, while 6 were covered only by Embase and 11 were indexed in neither of both databases. Hand searching four non-indexed German journals identified nearly 200 RCTs., Conclusion: Information flow between clinical research and CPG development remains difficult. Thoroughly performed literature searches have an important role in CPG development.

Even years after having sustained multiple injuries patients often suffer from its sequelae. These comprise restrictions in physical function, but also pain, social and psychological impairments. Although the Meran Consensus Conference in 1990 defined the contents of "quality of life" (QoL) measures in surgery, still no instrument is available for the valid assessment of all relevant QoL domains in multiple injured patients. This paper describes the systematic development of a modular instrument for the assessment of health related QoL. Within three phases (phase I: generation of items, phase II: item reduction, phase III: pre-testing in 70 multiple injured and control patients) a questionnaire of 57 items was developed, which measures all relevant trauma-related aspects of QoL after acute hospital care. In combination with the Glascow Outcome Scale (GOS), the EUROQOL and the SF-36, the newly developed instrument builds the Polytrauma Outcome Chart (POLO-Chart) which will also be used as "Part E" for outcome assessment within the "Trauma registry" of the German Society for Trauma Surgery. In phase IV, the POLO-Chart will finally be validated in five trauma centres (Celle, Essen, Hanover, Cologne und Munich).

Unlabelled: On hospital admission numerous variables are documented from multiple trauma patients. The value of these variables to predict outcome are discussed controversially. The aim was the ability to initially determine the probability of death of multiple trauma patients. Thus, a multivariate probability model was developed based on data obtained from the trauma registry of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU)., Patients and Methods: On hospital admission the DGU trauma registry collects more than 30 variables prospectively. In the first step of analysis those variables were selected, that were assumed to be clinical predictors for outcome from literature. In a second step a univariate analysis of these variables was performed. For all primary variables with univariate significance in outcome prediction a multivariate logistic regression was performed in the third step and a multivariate prognostic model was developed., Results: 2069 patients from 20 hospitals were prospectively included in the trauma registry from 01.01.1993-31.12.1997 (age 39 +/- 19 years; 70.0% males; ISS 22 +/- 13; 18.6% lethality). From more than 30 initially documented variables, the age, the GCS, the ISS, the base excess (BE) and the prothrombin time were the most important prognostic factors to predict the probability of death (P(death)). The following prognostic model was developed: P(death) = 1/1 + e(-[k + beta 1(age) + beta 2(GCS) + beta 3(ISS) + beta 4(BE) + beta 5(prothrombin time)]) where: k = -0.1551, beta 1 = 0.0438 with p < 0.0001, beta 2 = -0.2067 with p < 0.0001, beta 3 = 0.0252 with p = 0.0071, beta 4 = -0.0840 with p < 0.0001 and beta 5 = -0.0359 with p < 0.0001. Each of the five variables contributed significantly to the multifactorial model., Conclusions: These data show that the age, GCS, ISS, base excess and prothrombin time are potentially important predictors to initially identify multiple trauma patients with a high risk of lethality. With the base excess and prothrombin time value, as only variables of this multifactorial model that can be therapeutically influenced, it might be possible to better guide early and aggressive therapy.

Isolated severe head trauma (SHT) or SHT in combination with multiple injuries are important factors for the prognosis of morbidity and mortality in patients suffering from the consequences of accidents. The prognosis mainly depends on the presence of primary mechanic brain injury and the development of secondary brain damage. Causes for the development of secondary brain damage are the intracranial space demand after traumatic injury and edema formation which may result in iscemia, as well as inflammatory processes. Both isolated SHT and polytrauma with or without brain damage may result in a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) due to the synthesis of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators which may cause a single or multiple organ failure (MOF). Often the organism is able to survive isolated traumatic injuries and functional disturbances, but in combination or cumulation they may be lethal. The hypermetabolism after SHT is often regarded as an interaction between the central nervous system and the whole organism by the activation of the neuroendocrine axis. In contrast to the consequences of SHT for the whole organism, multiple injuries after polytrauma may affect brain functions, such as the shock dependent disturbance of the brain perfusion accompanied by brain hypoxia which may lead to an aggravated prognosis. Moreover, coagulation, metabolism and fracture healing are influenced by the onset of SIRS as well. Our knowledge about the bidirectional inflammatory interaction between brain and whole organism is still limited. In this context, the effects of secondary surgical interventions which may additionally, stress a traumatized body have to be considered and are the subject for actual clinical discussions and experimental studies. This article tries to summarize some important aspects on this topic.