Search

Background: Fractures of the scaphoid bone are common but can easily be overlooked in standard X‑rays. Inadequate diagnostics and therefore inappropriate treatment of scaphoid fractures often leads to problems in healing with formation of non-union and painful osteoarthritis of the wrist., Objective: This review summarizes the current practical recommendations in the diagnostics and treatment of acute scaphoid fractures., Methods: An analysis and review of selected literature including the current S3 guidelines were performed., Results: The main statements are that in cases of a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture, staged diagnostics including radiographs, computed tomography (CT) and when necessary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be applied to confirm or exclude a fracture. Further treatment in the case of a fracture is planned according to a CT-based classification. There are fracture types that can be treated either conservatively or operatively and there are other fracture types that always require operative fixation. The operative technique depends on the exact fracture geometry. For osteosynthesis, cannulated headless compression screws are mostly used.

The complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) still represents an incompletely etiologically understood complication following fractures of the distal radius. The incidence of CRPS following fractures of the distal radius varies between 1 % and 37 %. Pathophysiologically, a complex interaction of inflammatory, somatosensory, motor and autonomic changes is suspected, leading to a persistent maladaptive response and sensitization of the central and peripheral nervous systems with development of the corresponding symptoms. Decisive for the diagnostics are a detailed patient medical history and a clinical hand surgical, neurological and pain-related examination with confirmation of the Budapest criteria. Among the types of apparatus used for diagnostics, 3‑phase bone scintigraphy and temperature measurement have a certain importance. A multimodal therapy started as early as possible is the most promising approach for successful treatment. As part of a multimodal rehabilitation the main focus of therapy lies on pain relief and functional aspects.

Background: Four-corner fusion is a standard procedure for advanced carpal collapse. Several operative techniques and numerous implants for osseous fixation have been described. Recently, a specially designed locking plate (Aptus©, Medartis, Basel, Switzerland) was introduced. The purpose of this study was to compare functional results after osseous fixation using K-wires (standard of care, SOC) with four-corner fusion and locking plate fixation., Methods: 21 patients who underwent four-corner fusion in our institution between 2008 and 2013 were included in a retrospective analysis. In 11 patients, osseous fixation was performed using locking plates whereas ten patients underwent bone fixation with conventional K-wires. Outcome parameters were functional outcome, osseous consolidation, patient satisfaction (DASH- and Krimmer Score), pain and perioperative morbidity and the time until patients returned to daily work. Patients were divided in two groups and paired t-tests were performed for statistical analysis., Results: No implant related complications were observed. Osseous consolidation was achieved in all cases. Differences between groups were not significant regarding active range of motion (AROM), pain and function. Overall patient satisfaction was acceptable in all cases; differences in the DASH questionnaire and the Krimmer questionnaire were not significant. One patient of the plate group required conversion to total wrist arthrodesis without implant-related complications., Conclusion: Both techniques for four-corner fusion have similar healing rates. Using the more expensive locking implant avoids a second operation for K-wire removal, but no statistical differences were detected in functional outcome as well as in patient satisfaction when compared to SOC.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report long-term objective and patient-reported outcome after arthroscopic debridement of central degenerative triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) lesions., Methods: A total of 17 patients with central degenerative TFCC (Palmer type 2C) lesions and ulnar positive variance who were treated by arthroscopic debridement were retrospectively reviewed. Mean follow-up was 8.8 years. Assessment facilitating the Modified Mayo Wrist score (MMWS), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH score), recording of pain level and of patient satisfaction, and radiological examination were done., Results: Patients reached a pain level of 1.7 VAS, MMW score of 92, and DASH score of 22. No significant differences could be detected between the operated and the contralateral extremity regarding range of motion and grip strength for all patients. No perioperative complications occurred., Conclusion: Arthroscopic debridement of central degenerative TFCC lesions is safe, reliable, and efficacious even for ulnar positive variance., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

With the exception of the relatively frequent fractures of the scaphoid bone, isolated fractures of individual carpal bones are rare. Because these injuries are uncommon and because of the complex anatomy and function of the carpus, treatment of carpal bone fractures can be challenging. Carpal bone fractures generally occur in young, sports active and professional patients, can be easily overlooked in plain radiographs and are frequently associated with ligamentous instability, neurovascular injuries and tendon lesions. Small posttraumatic alterations of the precisely aligned carpal structure can cause chronic pain and functional impairment. Therefore, if a wrist fracture is suspected a thorough clinical examination and appropriate differentiated imaging is always necessary, at the end of which a fracture can be excluded or an appropriate conservative or surgical treatment is initiated, with the aim of restoration of carpal anatomy and function.

Background: Nonunion after ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) was observed at a high rate in patients undergoing long-term bisphosphonate (BP) maintenance treatment after breast cancer surgery. Here, we report the unique features of these nonunions., Methods: In total, 485 patients who had undergone USO between March 2008 and September 2017 were screened for inclusion based on the following criteria: (1) definitive nonunion after USO; (2) prior history of or ongoing BP therapy after the diagnosis of breast cancer; and (3) no evidence of metastasis in the ulna treated with USO, as determined based on the radiological evaluation., Results: Five patients with histories of breast cancer and subsequent BP treatment were identified; all (100%) of these patients showed definitive nonunion after USO. The mean age was 56.2 years, and all ulnae were on the contralateral side to that of the original breast cancer. Intravenous Ibandronate ® and Zolendronate ® were administrated to one and four patients, respectively. The mean period of administration was 67.8 months. Three patients exhibited suspicious lesions impending atypical fracture on their femurs, and the other two patients were treated by intramedullary nailing after the occurrence of atypical fractures. Radiological evaluation revealed no evidence of a metastatic lesion, including in the musculoskeletal system, in any patient. Osteosynthesis was performed with cancellous iliac bone graft and mean of 4.3 months after osteosynthesis, union in all cases was achieved., Conclusions: Problems associated with BP treatment are well known. Even in cases in which the agent is essential for preventing bony metastasis of breast cancer, the normal bony physiology, including bone turnover and healing, is likely to be compromised. In addition to atypical fractures of the femur and ulna, procedures such as USO are likely to be affected by BP. Furthermore, not only a primary iliac bone graft but also other method (oblique osteotomy) should be needed to avoid nonunion during plating in USO., Level of Evidence: IV, Retrospective case series.

Introduction: Total wrist arthrodesis represents a reliable salvage procedure for severe painful conditions of the wrist. To date, wrist arthrodesis using a dorsal plate reaching from the distal radius to the third metacarpal is still recommended. A new implant (APTUS© 2.5 TriLock Wrist Fusion Plate, Medartis Suisse) that does not cross the third carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ-3) has been introduced recently. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare both implants concerning early functional and clinical results., Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients underwent total wrist arthrodesis [10, using the new APTUS© implant (APT); 10 using the Depuy-Synthes© LCP plates (AO)]. The postoperative control interval was 18.2 and 37.2 months in APT and AO, respectively. Clinical assessment included functional parameters such as active range of motion (AROM) for pronation and supination, grip strength, and passive range of motion of the CMCJ-3. Additionally the DASH score and the Krimmer wrist score as well as pain levels at rest and under stress conditions were evaluated., Results: All patients showed osseous healing without complications except one case of non-union in APT. There were no significant differences between both groups concerning grip strength, AROM of the wrist, pain levels, DASH- and Krimmer Score. APT showed a significantly increased passive range of motion of the CMCJ-3 compared to the unaffected contralateral side., Conclusions: The new implant shows similar functional results compared to the standard procedure. The main advantage of the new implant is the fact that no implant removal is necessary due to the unaffected CMCJ-3. Furthermore the mobility of the CMCJ slightly increased and showed positive impact on hand kinematics.