Search

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) are regulators of bone remodeling, but are also considered to play important roles in coronary artery disease (CAD). This study evaluated potential associations of soluble (s) RANKL and OPG with atherosclerosis-relevant cytokines. Blood was collected from 414 individuals who presented to our hospital with intermediate likelihood for CAD for further examination. Plasma concentrations of total sRANKL, OPG, and 20 cytokines were measured using sandwich-type enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISAs; OPG and sRANKL) and Luminex laser-based fluorescence analysis and correlated with each other. The plasma levels of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and the T-helper cell 2 cytokines interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 showed a positive correlation with sRANKL. The association with sRANKL levels was negative for IFN-γ-induced protein-10 (IP-10) and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1). The strongest independent association with sRANKL in multivariable analyses was found for IFN-γ (positive) and IP-10 (negative), while IL-13 showed a positive and independent association with OPG plasma levels. OPG and sRANKL plasma levels correlate strongly and independently with specific circulating atherosclerosis-related cytokines in patients with intermediate cardiovascular risk.

Purpose: There is low evidence regarding the optimal treatment in patients with uterine sarcomas and malignant mixed Mullerian tumors (MMMTs). This study provides an overview of experience at our center with patients diagnosed with uterine sarcoma and MMMT, in relation to the clinical management and outcome., Methods: The medical records for 143 patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), leiomyosarcoma (LMS), and high-grade (undifferentiated) endometrial sarcoma (UES) and MMMT were reviewed. All available clinical and pathological data were collected and analyzed. Putative prognostic factors were entered into a multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards ratio model, and survival data were calculated., Results: The 5-year overall survival rates were significantly different between patients with ESS, LMS, and UES and MMMT (86 vs. 40 vs. 57 vs. 45 %; P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis showed that the patients' age, higher FIGO stage (III-IV), a history of smoking, prior pelvic radiation, diabetes, and residual tumor after surgery were associated with a poorer overall survival. Histological subtypes of LMS (HR 4.68; 95 % CI 1.35-16.17), UES (HR 1.21; 95 % CI 0.26-5.77) and MMMT (HR 1.63; 95 % CI 0.42-6.43) were also associated with a poorer overall survival than ESS (P = 0.008). Adjuvant therapies showed no associations with overall survival., Conclusions: Adjuvant therapy has so far not shown any overall survival benefit, and the focus is therefore on primary surgery. In future studies, the entities should be investigated separately in relation to prognostic factors and effective therapeutic management.

Purpose: As breast cancer survivors are benefiting increasingly from advanced forms of therapy, the side effects of locoregional treatment in the adjuvant setting are becoming more and more important. This article presents a new method of assessing the spatial distribution of paresthesia in breast cancer survivors after different locoregional treatments., Methods: A structured questionnaire assessing paresthesia, with body pictograms for marking paresthesia areas, was completed by 343 breast cancer survivors. The image information was digitized, generating gray-scale summation images with numbers from 0, indicating black (100 % of the patients had paresthesia), to 255, indicating white (none had paresthesia). The resulting map visualization showed the locations of paresthesia on body pictograms. The group included patients who had undergone breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy, and also patients who had received percutaneous and interstitial radiation., Results: A total of 56.5 % of the patients stated that they had paresthesia. The paresthesia areas were distributed within the range suggested by clinical experience. Most patients stated that they had paresthesia in the upper outer quadrant and axilla. Patients who had undergone mastectomy or percutaneous radiotherapy appeared to have more paresthesia on some areas of the body surface. Patients who had undergone mastectomy indicated larger areas of paresthesia than those with BCS-4,066 pixels (px) vs. 2,275 px. Radiotherapy did not appear to influence the spatial distribution of paresthesia., Conclusions: Paresthesia is a common symptom after breast cancer treatment. This paper describes a new method of assessing this side effect to improve and individualize treatment for it in the future.

Introduction: Although care in certified breast centers is now established throughout Germany, numerous services are still not being reimbursed. This also affects other centers involved in the specialty of gynecology such as gynecological cancer centers, perinatal centers, and endometriosis centers. Although a certified center is entitled to charge additional fees, these are in most cases not reimbursed. Calculation of additional costs is limited by the fact that data from the Institute for the Hospital Reimbursement System (Institut für das Entgeltsystem im Krankenhaus, InEK) do not reflect interdisciplinary services and procedures. For decision-makers, society's willingness to pay is an important factor in guiding decisions on the basis of social priorities. A hypothetical maximum willingness to pay can be calculated using a willingness-to-pay analysis, making it possible to identify deficiencies in the arbitrary setting of health budgets at the macro-level., Materials and Methods: In a multicenter study conducted between November 2009 and December 2010, 2,469 patients at a university hospital and at a non-university hospital were asked about the extent of their awareness of certified centers, the influence of centers on hospital presentation, and about personal attitudes toward quality-oriented reimbursement. A subjective assessment of possible additional charges was calculated using a willingness-to-pay analysis., Results: In the overall group, 53.4 % of the patients were aware of what a certified center is and 27.4 % had specific information (obstetrics 40.0/32.3 %; mastology 66.8/23.2 %; gynecological oncology 54.7/27.3 %; P < 0.001). For 43.8 %, a certified center was one reason or the major reason for presentation (obstetrics 26.2 %; mastology 66.8 %; gynecological oncology 46.6 %; P < 0.001). A total of 72.6 % were in favor of quality-oriented reimbursement and 69.7 % were in favor of an additional charge for a certified center amounting to €538.56 (mastology €643.65, obstetrics €474.67, gynecological oncology €532.47). In all, 33.9 % would accept an increase in health-insurance fees (averaging 0.3865 %), and 28.3 % were in favor of reduced remuneration for non-certified centers., Conclusions: The existence of certified centers is being increasingly recognized by patients. Additional charges for certified centers are generally supported. There is therefore a clear demand for them-from patients as well. This may be useful when negotiations are being conducted.

Background: Identifying biomarkers that can predict the prognosis and treatment response is helpful for individualizing breast cancer (BC) therapy. A neoadjuvant treatment setting is ideal for testing biomarkers capable of predicting the treatment response. This study analyzed the value of immunohistochemical biomarkers for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) and prognosis in a group of BC patients receiving standardized treatment., Patients and Methods: A total of 100 BC patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (four cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) between 2000 and 2005. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded core biopsies were taken before chemotherapy for immunohistochemical staining of ER, PgR, HER2, Bcl-2, p53, cyclin D1, CK5/6, CK8, CK18, and TOP2A. Patient and tumor characteristics and biomarker scores were used to predict pCR and prognosis, using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models., Results: pCR was achieved in 11 patients and was predicted by the established marker Ki-67. In addition, CK5/6 and CK18 improved the prediction model and were associated with lower pCR rates. For the prognosis, only the established markers nodal status, Ki-67, and PgR predicted overall survival and nodal status; Ki-67 and PgR predicted distant disease-free survival., Conclusions: In this small retrospective study, CK5/6 and CK18 appeared to improve prediction of pCR in addition to the established markers. CK5/6 may indicate a tumor type resembling a basal phenotype that is more resistant to anthracycline-based therapy, and CK18 may indicate a luminal subtype that is more resistant to chemotherapy. However, these results need to be replicated in larger studies.