Search

Background: Spondylodiscitis is a rare disease with an increasing incidence., Methods: In this retrospective study 112 patients with spondylodiscitis surgically treated from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2012 in a level I spine center were investigated with respect to potential prognostic criteria. The time period covered by the investigation was the duration of hospitalization. The parameters analyzed were mortality, age, localization of the spondylodiscitis, detection of abscesses and pathogens, neurological status and body mass index (BMI)., Results: The average age of the patients was 68.3 years (±12.9 years). The mortality rate during hospitalization was 10.7% (N = 12). Older patients had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate (p = 0.008). Abscess formation was found in 49.1% of the patients and was associated with a significantly longer hospital stay (p = 0.001) and in the intensive care unit (ICU, p = 0.001) as well as a higher risk of revision surgery (p = 0.018). In addition, obese patients had a significantly higher occurrence of abscesses (p = 0.034). Pathogen detection was successful in 60.7 % of the cases with Staphylococcus aureus as the most frequent pathogen. Detection of pathogens was associated with a longer hospital stay (p = 0.006) and a greater need of intensive care monitoring (p = 0.017). Patients with a nephropathy had a significantly increased mortality, longer duration of hospitalization and a more frequent occurrence of multilevel afflictions., Conclusion: Old age, abscess formation, positive detection of pathogens and renal failure can be used as prognostic criteria. Risk factors for formation of abscesses include a lumbar localization of spondylodiscitis, nephropathy as well as detection of a pathogen and obesity.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors of accompanied C1 fractures in elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures (OF) and to analyze the complication rate and the outcomes of patients after combined anterior odontoid and transarticular C1/2 screw fixation (AOTAF)., Materials and Methods: The study represents a retrospective case series at a single level-1 trauma center. All elderly patients (≥ 70 years) with acute combination injuries (CI) including type II OF with an accompanied C1 fracture, who were treated by an anterior approach, were included. All postoperative complications were analyzed based on the patient notes. Clinical and radiological controls were performed after 1 year. Main parameters of interest were 1-year mortality rate, pain level, and satisfaction rate after 1 year., Results: A total of 23 patients were included. The average age was 84.6 years (range 73-94 years). All patients had atlanto-odontoid osteoarthritis (AOO) and all but two patients were injured by low-energy falls. Dysphagia was the most common postoperative complication (26.1%). Surgical revision was necessary in one of these patients due to hematoma. Dysphagia improved in all patients considerably. Loss of follow-up was 21.7%. The 1-year mortality was 21.7% (n = 5). The mean pain level and satisfaction rate was 2.5 (± 0.9) and 7.3 (± 0.7), respectively. After 1 year, no signs of non-union were visible., Conclusions: AOO was observed in all patients with CI. The main cause of trauma was a low-energy fall. The pain levels were low to moderate and satisfaction levels were promising 1 year after surgery. Nonetheless, AOTAF is associated with a high rate of postoperative dysphagia, which resolves in the majority of patients due to conservative management.

Background: Bisegmental dorsal stabilization is a common treatment option for instable compression fractures of the thoracolumbar spine; however, it remains unknown to what extent bridging compromises intervertebral discs., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the disc height and functional features in comparison to healthy intervertebral discs after removal of the dorsal fixator and particularly under consideration of the time span between dorsal stabilization and implant removal (IR)., Material and Methods: The IR was performed in 19 patients after an average of 13 months (range 8-24 months) after dorsal stabilization of instable vertebral compression fractures of the thoracolumbar junction and lumbar spine. An additional ventral monosegmental spondylodesis was performed in 10 patients with incomplete burst fractures. Thus, a total of 28 intervertebral discs were temporarily bridged (bridged discs), with an adjacent endplate fracture in 10 (injured discs) and no adjacent bony lesion in 18 discs (healthy discs). The intervertebral discs superior and inferior to the instrumentation were selected as controls (control discs). Standardized conventional lateral radiographs were taken prior to and after IR as well as after 6 months. Additionally, standardized lateral radiographs in flexion and extension were taken. The intervertebral disc height (disc height) was determined by two independent board approved orthopedic observers by measuring the anterior, central and dorsal intervertebral disc spaces on all lateral radiographs as well as the intervertebral disc angles (disc angle) defined by the intervertebral upper and lower endplates in the flexion and extension views. Intradisc function (disc function) was defined as the difference between the disc angle in extension and flexion. The measurements were repeated after 12 months. Univariate analysis was performed using ANOVA and significance was set at p < 0.05. Interobserver and intraobserver comparisons of the disc heights and the disc angles were determined with intraclass correlation coefficients., Results: No significant differences were seen in disc function and disc height between the controls and the bridged discs at all times of measurement; however, injured discs showed a significantly reduced disc height and disc angle in extension compared to healthy discs (p = 0.028 and p = 0.027, respectively). Additionally, patients with IR during the first 12 months had significantly reduced disc heights compared to those patients with delayed IR within the second postoperative year (p = 0.018). Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for disc function was 0.80 (95 % confidence interval CI: 0.68-0.88) and 0.85 (95 % CI 0.76-0.90), respectively. The interobserver and intraobserver correlations for disc height were 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.76-0.90) and 0.93 (95 % CI 0.88-0.95), respectively., Conclusion: Bridging of an intervertebral disc with IR within 24 months does not cause immediate loss of disc function or reduction of disc height; however, temporary bridging in combination with an adjacent endplate fracture causes significant reduction of disc height and loss of extension. Additionally, no beneficial effects could be seen by reducing the time span between stabilization and IR to below 12 months.

Introduction: There is a general consensus that unstable vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar junction with a B type fracture or a high load shear index need to be surgically stabilized, primarily by a dorsal approach. The authors believe that there are indications for an additional ventral spondylodesis in cases of reduction loss or a relevant intervertebral disc lesion in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 6 weeks after dorsal stabilization. However, in cases of unstable vertebral fractures it remains unclear if a delayed anterior spondylodesis will lead to unacceptable loss of initial reduction., Material and Methods: A total of 59 patients were included in this study during 2013 and 2014. All patients suffered from a traumatic vertebral fracture of the thoracolumbar junction and were initially treated with a dorsal short segment stabilization. All vertebral body fractures had a load shear index of at least 5 or were B type fractures. An x-ray control was carried out after 2 and 6 weeks and MRI was additionally performed after 6 weeks. An additional ventral spondylodesis was recommended in patients showing a reduction loss of at least 5° and in patients with relevant intervertebral disc lesions. The extent of the reduction loss was analyzed. Other parameters of interest were the fracture level, fracture classification, patient age and surgical technique (e.g. implant, index screw, laminectomy and cement augmentation)., Results: The patient collective consisted of 23 women and 36 men (average age 51 years ± 17 years). The mean reduction loss was 5.1° (± 5.2°) after a mean follow-up of 60 days (± 56 days). The reduction loss was significantly higher when polyaxial implants were used compared to monoaxial dorsal fixators (10.8° versus 4.0°, p < 0.001). There was a significantly higher reduction loss in those patients who received a laminectomy (11.3° versus 4.3°, p = 0.01) but there were no significant differences if an index screw was used (4.5° versus 5.3°). Additionally, there was a significantly lower reduction in the subgroup of patients 60 years or older who were stabilized using cement-augmented screws (3.9° versus 11.3°, p = 0.02). The mean reduction loss was 2.8° (± 2.5°) in patients treated with a monoaxial implant, cement-augmented if 60 years or older and without laminectomy (n = 39). There was no significant correlation between reduction loss and the other parameters of interest, such as fracture morphology with classification according to the working group on questions of osteosynthesis (AO) and McCormack or fracture level., Conclusion: Delayed indications for an additional ventral spondylodesis in patients with unstable thoracolumbar vertebral fractures and initial dorsal stabilization will cause no relevant reduction loss if monoaxial implants are used and laminectomy can be avoided. Additionally, cement augmentation of the pedicle screws seems to be beneficial in patients 60 years of age or older.

Background: In anterior reconstruction of the unstable thoracolumbar spine, discectomy and corpectomy are technically demanding steps requiring maximal surgical precision. This study investigated the feasibility of computer-aided guidance for discectomy and corpectomy. It also analysed the precision, advantages, and disadvantages of the procedure., Patients and Methods: Vertebral body fractures of the non-osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine addressed by discectomy/corpectomy and subsequent implant interposition (cage, tricortical strut graft) for anterior reconstruction were included. All surgical steps were done under endoscopic assistance. In the trial group, discectomy and corpectomy were performed with computer-aided guidance; in the control group, no computer navigation was used. The time required for surgery was noted. To assess surgical precision, decentralization of the implant in the frontal plane was measured in postoperative x-rays and computed tomography. Additionally, parallel alignment of vertebral body end plates with the implant was evaluated., Results: The trial group (TG) consisted of 16 patients, and the control group (CG) of 10 patients. Fractures were localized between T10 and L1 in TG, and between T9 and L1 in CG. Operating time was significantly shorter in CG: 104+/-28 min compared with 229+/-64 min in TG (p<0.0005). In contrast, data on surgical precision showed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for either decentralization or parallel endplate alignment of implants. Remarkably, for CG we noted 2 cases of cage subsidence into an adjacent end plate, whereas for TG this was noted in only 1 case. However, this difference was not statistically significant., Conclusion: Computer-aided guidance for anterior reconstruction of the thoracolumbar spine is a technically feasible option that may help in performing discectomy and corpectomy. However, this technique significantly prolongs the operating time. There were no differences in the precision of implant positioning between the groups. However, during discectomy the use of computer navigation may possibly add to the protection of adjacent end plates.

Question: This retrospective study presents results after conservative and operative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures as function of its localization., Methodology: In 2 years 70 patients with A1/A2 fracture were conservatively treated, 38 patients with A3/B/C injury were treated by internal fixtor. For evaluation 3 vertebral sections(Th5-10,Th11-L2,L3-5)were defined. Follow-up took place 1 year after implant removal or end of conservative treatment., Results: The correction-loss was highest in thoracic, lowest in lumbar region. After conservative therapy,correction-loss was located to 3/4 in vertebra itself, after operative treatment especially in adjacent disc spaces. There was no general correlation to complaints., Conclusion: In consequence of these results A1/A2-fractures in the upper thoracic spine (15 degrees will be stabilized anteriorly, in other regions functional treated. A3-fractures of thoracic spine and thoracolumbar junction will be operated from anterior, in lower lumbar spine (>L3) from dorsal. B- and C-injuries should be instrumented with a combined dorsoventral procedure.

Between March 1997 and October 1999 thirty-one patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures were treated with crossed screw osteosynthesis. Insertion of the screws was realized by using a deltoideo-pectoral approach placing the screws anteriorly and posteriorly in a crossed manner from the distal fragment into the humeral head. Additionally, in all two-part-fractures a tension band was applied. In all three-part-fractures, the greater tuberosity was reattached by additional screws. In 21 patients (14 female, 7 male, median age 62 years, 18-86) a clinical and radiological follow-up (median 18 months, 10-29) was obtained. Fractures were classified as two-part-fractures in 10 patients and as three-part-fractures in 11 patients. According to the Constant-Score, "excellent" and "good" results were achieved in 15 patients, "moderate" results were found in 3 patients. However, in 3 patients results were only "poor" (1 two-part-, 2 three-part-fractures). The complication rate was 29% (premature hardware removal due to head perforation in 3 cases; humeral head necrosis necessitating prosthetic replacement in 2 patients; secondary displacement in 1 case). Crossed screw osteosynthesis represents an justified alternative in the surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures permitting early functional therapy.