Search

Introduction: The purpose of this retrospective registry-based study is to assess survival and causes of failure of cementless stem implants used in total hip arthroplasty (THAs), to ascertain if there are differences when these are categorized according to the six types described by Mont., Methods: Data collected from the regional registry regarding all primary THAs performed from 2000 to 2019 were analyzed. Femoral prosthetic stems were divided into the six types of Mont classification. For each stem type, number of implants, survival and causes of failure were evaluated and compared., Results: The most frequently implanted stem type was the 3c type (53.4%). Type 1 had the lowest stem failure rate (1.6%), and type 6 showed the highest (3.9%). Periprosthetic fracture was the most frequent complication in type 6, accounting for 34.5% of failures. Aseptic loosening was the main complication in type 2 stems, accounting for 36.4% of failures. Pairwise comparisons showed significant higher survival of type 1 compared to type 3c (p = 0.000026) and type 6 (p = 0.000076), and between type 3a compared to type 3c (p = 0.03) and type 6 (p = 0.026)., Conclusion: Significant variations in implant survival rates were found among the six Mont-types of cementless stems. These findings emphasize the paramount importance of stem design and fixation area in determining long-term survival, providing a guidance for orthopedic surgeons in the selection of the most appropriate stem for primary THA, contributing to our understanding of cementless stem performance, presenting invaluable insights to further improve patient outcomes in THA surgery., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Posterior stabilised (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design development that focused on restoring normal knee kinematics was followed by the introduction of reason-guided motion designs. Although all PS fixed-bearing knee designs were thought to have similar kinematics, reports show they have differing incidences and magnitudes of posterior femoral rollback and axial rotation. In this retrospective comparative study between two guided-motion total knee systems, we hypothesised that kinematic pattern has an influence on clinical and functional outcomes., Methods: This study represents the continuation of a previously reported clinical and kinematics analysis. We retrospectively reviewed 347 patients treated with two different TKA designs: Scorpio NRG (Stryker Orthopedics) and Journey Bi-Cruciate Stabilised (BCS) knee system (Smith & Nephew). Two hundred and eighty-one patients were assessed clinically. Patients were divided into groups according to implanted TKA. Clinical evaluation with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire was performed. Fifteen Scorpio NRG and 16 Journey BCS patients underwent video fluoroscopy during stair climbing, chair rising/sitting and step up/down at six months of follow-up., Results: At an average 29 months of clinical follow-up, patients with Journey BCS TKAs reported better clinical results. Stiffness was more frequently reported in the Journey group (5.2 % vs 1.2 %), whereas anterior knee pain was observed in the Scorpio NRG group (1.9 %) only. Both prosthetic models reported different posterior translation of the medial and lateral contact points (CP) in all analysed motor tasks during knee flexion (BCS 10-18 mm; NRG Scorpio 2-3 mm). Both designs produced progressive external rotation of the femoral component relative to the tibia during flexion., Conclusions: Journey BCS showed statistically significant better KOOS results. The higher posterior femoral rollback observed in the kinematic assessment of this design, associated with a better patellofemoral design, may be the reason for better clinical outcome. The reported cases of stiffness and anterolateral joint pain could be attributed to excessive medial and lateral tibiofemoral posterior translation. The NRG group demonstrated good axial rotation, but this was not coupled with physiological kinematic patterns. Patellofemoral pain can be explained by a less friendly femoral-groove design. TKA clinical-functional outcome and complications were highly influenced by the bearing geometry and kinematic pattern of prosthetic designs.