1. A comparison of the discriminatory ability and sensitivity of the trigeminal and olfactory systems to chemical stimuli in the tiger salamander.
- Author
-
Silver WL, Arzt AH, and Mason JR
- Subjects
- Action Potentials drug effects, Animals, Butanols, Chemoreceptor Cells drug effects, Cyclohexanones, Olfactory Pathways drug effects, Pentanols, Trigeminal Nerve drug effects, Central Nervous System physiology, Chemoreceptor Cells physiology, Discrimination Learning physiology, Odorants, Olfactory Pathways physiology, Trigeminal Nerve physiology, Caudata physiology
- Abstract
Trigeminal receptors can respond to a wide variety of chemical stimuli, but it is unknown whether these receptors mediate discrimination between chemical stimuli matched for equal perceptual intensity. The present electrophysiological and behavioral experiments address this issue using tiger salamanders, Ambystoma tigrinum, and four compounds (amyl acetate, cyclohexanone, butanol, and d-limonene). In addition, the relative sensitivities of the trigeminal and olfactory systems to these compounds are compared. In electrophysiological cross-adaptation experiments (amyl acetate vs cyclohexanone; butanol vs d-limonene), there was complete cross adaptation such that only concentrations above the background (cross-adapting) stimulus concentration elicited responses, suggesting that chemical stimuli may stimulate trigeminal receptors nonspecifically. In behavioral experiments (amyl acetate vs cyclohexanone; butanol vs d-limonene), only animals with intact olfactory nerves could discriminate between perceptually equivalent concentrations, that is concentrations that elicited the same level of responding. Both electrophysiologically and behaviorally, the trigeminal system exhibited higher thresholds than the olfactory system. We conclude that trigeminal chemoreceptors, at least in salamanders, are unable to discriminate between these two pairs of compounds when matched for equal perceptual intensity, and that trigeminal chemoreceptors are less sensitive than olfactory receptors.
- Published
- 1988
- Full Text
- View/download PDF