Search

We measured the sustained neural response to electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant (CI). To do so, we interleaved two stimuli with frequencies F1 and F2 Hz and recorded a neural distortion response (NDR) at F2-F1 Hz. We show that, because any one time point contains only the F1 or F2 stimulus, the instantaneous nonlinearities typical of electrical artefact should not produce distortion at this frequency. However, if the stimulus is smoothed, such as by charge integration at the nerve membrane, subsequent (neural) nonlinearities can produce a component at F2-F1 Hz. We stimulated a single CI electrode with interleaved sinusoids or interleaved amplitude-modulated pulse trains such that F2 = 1.5F1, and found no evidence for an NDR when F2-F1 was between 90 and 120 Hz. However, interleaved amplitude-modulated pulse trains with F2-F1~40 Hz revealed a substantial NDR with a group delay of about 45 ms, consistent with a thalamic and/or cortical response. The NDR could be measured even from recording electrodes adjacent to the implant and at the highest pulse rates (> 4000 pps) used clinically. We then measured the selectivity of this sustained response by presenting F1 and F2 to different electrodes and at different between-electrode distances. This revealed a broad tuning that, we argue, reflects the overlap between the excitation elicited by the two electrodes. Our results also provide a glimpse of the neural nonlinearity in the auditory system, unaffected by the biomechanical cochlear nonlinearities that accompany acoustic stimulation. Several potential clinical applications of our findings are discussed. ispartof: JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY vol:22 issue:2 pages:141-159 ispartof: location:United States status: published

The healthy auditory system enables communication in challenging situations with high levels of background noise. Yet, despite normal sensitivity to pure tones, many listeners complain about having difficulties in such situations. Recent animal studies demonstrated that noise overexposure that produces temporary threshold shifts can cause the loss of auditory nerve (AN) fiber synapses (i.e., cochlear synaptopathy, CS), which appears to predominantly affect medium- and low-spontaneous rate (SR) fibers. In the present study, envelope following response (EFR) magnitude-level functions were recorded in normal hearing (NH) threshold and mildly hearing-impaired (HI) listeners with thresholds elevated above 2 kHz. EFRs were elicited by sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) tones presented in quiet with a carrier frequency of 2 kHz, modulated at 93 Hz, and modulation depths of 0.85 (deep) and 0.25 (shallow). While EFR magnitude-level functions for deeply modulated tones were similar for all listeners, EFR magnitudes for shallowly modulated tones were reduced at medium stimulation levels in some NH threshold listeners and saturated in all HI listeners for the whole level range. A phenomenological model of the AN was used to investigate the extent to which hair-cell dysfunction and/or CS could explain the trends observed in the EFR data. Hair-cell dysfunction alone, including postulated elevated hearing thresholds at extended high frequencies (EHF) beyond 8 kHz, could not account for the recorded EFR data. Postulated CS led to simulations generally consistent with the recorded data, but a loss of all types of AN fibers was required within the model framework. The effects of off-frequency contributions (i.e., away from the characteristic place of the stimulus) and the differential loss of different AN fiber types on EFR magnitude-level functions were analyzed. When using SAM tones in quiet as the stimulus, model simulations suggested that (1) EFRs are dominated by the activity of high-SR fibers at all stimulus intensities, and (2) EFRs at medium-to-high stimulus levels are dominated by off-frequency contributions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10162-019-00721-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Most natural sounds, including speech, exhibit temporal amplitude fluctuations. This information is encoded as amplitude modulations (AM)—essential for auditory and speech perception. The neural representation of AM has been studied at various stages of the ascending auditory system from the auditory nerve to the cortex. In contrast, research on neural coding of AM in the efferent pathway has been extremely limited. The objective of this study was to investigate the encoding of AM signals in the medial olivocochlear system by measuring the modulation transfer functions of the efferent response in humans. A secondary goal was to replicate the controversial findings from the literature that efferent stimulation produces larger effects for the AM elicitor with 100 Hz modulation frequency in comparison with the unmodulated elicitor. The efferent response was quantified by measuring changes in stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission magnitude due to various modulated and unmodulated elicitors. Unmodulated, broadband noise elicitors yielded either slightly larger or similar efferent responses relative to modulated elicitors depending on the modulation frequency. Efferent responses to the unmodulated and modulated elicitors with 100 Hz modulation frequency were not significantly different. The efferent system encoding of AM sounds—modulation transfer functions—can be modeled with a first-order Butterworth low-pass filter with different cutoff frequencies for ipsilateral and contralateral elicitors. The ipsilateral efferent pathway showed a greater sensitivity to AM information comparted to the contralateral pathway. Efferent modulation transfer functions suggest that the ability of the system to follow AM decreases with increasing modulation frequency and that efferents may not be fully operating on the envelope of the speech.