Search

Purpose Head and neck cancer (HNC) and its treatment can leave devastating side effects with a relevant impact on physical and emotional quality of life (QoL) of HNC patients. The objectives were to examine the amount of dysphagia, voice problems, and pain in HNC patients, the impact of sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical factors on these symptoms, the psychometric properties of the EAT-10, and the relationship between these symptoms and QoL variables. Methods HNC patients attending for regular follow-up from 07/2013 to 09/2019 completed questionnaires (Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10); questions from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC H&N35) on dysphagia, voice problems, pain, fatigue, and QoL collected with the software OncoFunction. Associations between prognostic factors and symptoms were tested with analyses of variance (ANOVAs). Associations between the symptom scales and QoL variables were expressed with Pearson correlations. Results Of 689 patients, 54.9% suffered from dysphagia, the EAT-10 proved to be a reliable measure. The mean voice score was 37.6 (± 33.9) [range 0–100], the mean pain score 1.98 (± 2.24) [range 0–10]. Trimodality treatment was associated with the highest dysphagia scores. Dysphagia, voice problems, and pain significantly correlated with each other, the highest association was found for dysphagia and pain (r = 0.51). QoL was strongly correlated with dysphagia and pain (r = − 0.39 and r = − 0.40, respectively), while the association with voice problems was weaker (r = − 0.28). Conclusion Dysphagia is an important symptom in HNC patients greatly affecting patients’ QoL and significantly correlating with voice problems and pain.

Quality of life measurements are well established in cancer clinical trials. In daily clinical practice, where cancer patients often suffer from disease-specific symptoms and report unmet needs regarding their treatment, these measurements are not systematically implemented. The systematic (often computer-based) assessment of quality of life in daily cancer care has shown to be beneficial for patient-physician communication, symptom management, shared decision-making, and in creating a learning health system. Unfortunately, to date, routine electronic quality of life assessments are usually limited to large cancer facilities. Patient and physician barriers as well as barriers from the administrative side in particular are currently hindering the implementation of these systems into the broad spectrum of clinical cancer care. Cost-effectiveness analyses of existing systems, the inclusion of all relevant stakeholders, and clear implementation guidelines are required to introduce quality of life measurements in clinical cancer practice to improve the treatment of cancer survivors and to create a health care system that addresses all their disease-related needs.