1. Simplifying the assessment of the recovery from surgical injury to the lingual nerve
- Author
-
S.-J. Crean, Tara Renton, Matthew Hankins, and Allan J. Thexton
- Subjects
Pain Threshold ,Dental practice ,Sensation ,Lingual Nerve ,Hypesthesia ,Lingual Nerve Injuries ,Recovery period ,Tongue ,stomatognathic system ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Humans ,Medicine ,Paresthesia ,Prospective Studies ,Intraoperative Complications ,Prospective cohort study ,Lingual Nerve Injury ,General Dentistry ,Cranial Nerve Injuries ,Lingual nerve ,business.industry ,Recovery of Function ,Taste Buds ,Surgical Injury ,Hyperalgesia ,Touch ,Sensory Thresholds ,Anesthesia ,Predictive value of tests ,Assessment methods ,Neuralgia ,Molar, Third ,business ,Mechanoreceptors ,Follow-Up Studies ,Forecasting - Abstract
Objective To determine the sensitivity of conventional sensory assessment in monitoring lingual nerve recovery subsequent to third molar surgery and to evaluate if the assessment methods can be predictive of injury outcome. Method A prospective case series of 94 patients presenting with lingual nerve injuries evaluated using objective mechanosensory and subjective methods during the recovery period of up to 12 months. Results The conventional tests were often unable to diagnose the presence of injury due to variability and they were not predictive of outcome. As a result of this study, we are able to identify patients more likely to have permanent rather than temporary lingual nerve injury at four to eight weeks post injury, using patient reported subjective function. The subjective function test also minimises the requirements for specialist training or equipment providing an ideal method for general dental practice. Conclusions The development of these simple subjective tests may enable us to identify which patients are at risk of permanent lingual nerve injuries in the early post injury phase, thus allowing expeditious therapy when indicated.
- Published
- 2006