Search

Borderline patients present particular treatment problems and require close, devoted understanding of their often chaotic and shifting intrapsychic conflicts. Many of these patients act out, making it difficult to maintain an analytic process. In fact, many terminate early on. When they do stay for longer periods, they exhibit particular constellations of defense, anxiety, and conflict. One extensive case report is used to examine the overlapping cycles of treatment with this population. Frequently, self-destructive acting-out is present in the transference and extra-transference. This acting-out is often followed by the self-destructive, anti-change attitude of the death instinct. These ways of relating to the self and the object are mobilized within the vehicle of projective identification and are best understood as primitive defenses against core fantasies of loss and persecution. These issues of loss and fear are the final and vital phase of treatment with borderline patients, who are often able to make major fundamental changes in their internal sphere, but only if patient and analyst can tolerate and understand these three levels of intrapsychic experience.

For a variety of reasons, psychoanalytic training is done in somewhat of a vacuum. It teaches a theory and a way of practicing that does not always translate well to day-to-day private practice work. The clinical realities of psychoanalytic practice prove the psychoanalytic method to be one that provides help to a wider audience than classical psychoanalytic training programs might suggest. The psychoanalytic approach offers the analyst many special opportunities to work with and help a wide variety of patients. Analysts who accept both the limitations as well as the wide application and broad benefits of the psychoanalytic approach may have a more fulfilling experience than their training experiences might foster. At the same time, the analyst's level of therapeutic skill, the patient's diagnosis, and many multiple external factors create different limitations in the practice and outcome of psychoanalytic work. Extensive case material is used to show the broad range of patients who are helped by the psychoanalytic method. The clinical material also shows the less than perfect, but often good enough outcomes of these difficult cases with often severely disturbed patients.

The interaction of strong aggressive and libidinal drives, various primitive intrapsychic fantasies linking somatic sensations, body parts, ego, object, and the effects of early environmental stress and trauma all produce a potential crisis in the paranoid-schizoid period of development. Certain innate methods of understanding somatic experiences as well as the interaction between internal and external reality lead to an unconscious triangulation of part objects. A frustrating, stimulating, or punitive "third" that blocks, nullifies, or overgratifies certain wishes then emerges as a pivotal object in the internal landscape. During the paranoid-schizoid, triadic process, there is a fluctuation between separation/individuation and de-differentiation/fusion. If the early triangulation process has been either exceedingly frustrating or overly stimulating in regards to "reaching the third" or "warding off the third," the infantile ego is fixed by aggressive and libidinal forces to de-differentiation experiences rather than to more separate and individuated ways of relating. Therefore, the later oedipal stage will be colored by excessive oral and anal conflicts and will be weighted on the side of primitive maneuvering based on splitting, projection, and introjection. When the child (and later the adult) becomes involved in oedipal situations marked by stimulation or frustration of triadic drives, there can be a regression to the earlier paranoid-schizoid triadic period. A case study was presented in which a patient struggled with a partial working through of these conditions in dreams and in the transference. This pulled her more in the direction of a differentiated Oedipal conflict and whole object functioning.

Due to the extreme states of masochism, dependency, and narcissistic rage that these patients experience, the treatment must be attuned to the inevitable periods of regression and primitive defense. The patient feels compelled to be a servant to the object, yet is furious at this less than equal status. The alternating states of idealizing the object in a masochistic fashion, the anger at the lack of self importance, and the desperate hope for soothing from that object create an externally focused character structure, which generally leads to a pattern of acting out, the lack of internal linking processes, and a scarcity of interpersonal skills that foster mutuality. A fundamental lack of self soothing leads to a perpetual search and craving for the soothing talents of the object. It is often unconsciously believed that compliance and servitude will bring about this gift of soothing from the object. Hans Loewald (1962) had described internalization as a process whereby the child reaches out to take back from the environment what has been removed from him in an ever-increasing manner since his birth. For the forgotten hero, this theory is definitely true. Not only is the treatment of this type of patient one of gradual internalization of new internal object relationships and the working through of the older more pathological ones, but it is a true understanding between patient and analyst of the original nontolerable removal of the uniqueness of the self via reality and/or fantasy states. When this situation is focused upon and worked with, the taking back from the environment can occur in a spirit devoid of former states of envy, hate, resentment, and wild craving that were formally protected and disguised in a facade of dependent masochism. The patient has essentially experienced or perceived his parents, usually the mother, as not providing a soothing function or a proper fit for his developing ego. The patient has then gone about constructing various methods to compensate for this lack. The analyst is often experienced as not providing an adequate soothing function, but this emptiness is warded off from conscious expression with a compromise formation of dependent, masochistic, or narcissistic methods of relating. This style of compromise hides any envy, hunger, or rage and keeps alive the hopes of being rewarded with soothing. The patients expects to be used as a waste disposal unit and believes that this dumping by the object into him is the longed-for love. Ideally, interpretations focus upon the hunger for the soothing function of the object and the drive to obtain it at any cost. The patient will fiercely resist because he believes that in giving up his masochism and dependency, he would expose his envy and narcissistic injury. This patient believes he would then lose any hope of ever receiving the soothing function due to the fantasized destruction of the source of that soothing, his beloved object.