Search

The pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is incompletely understood, but in at least some patients, alterations in the gut microbiome are likely to be etiologically relevant. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the available evidence to date for the use of prebiotics and probiotics in the treatment of IBS, with particular attention to broad themes in therapeutic rationale as well as critical gaps in the literature. A number of individual studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated efficacy in the use of prebiotics and probiotics for IBS. Even so, variability in study design, risk of bias, and short follow-up intervals limit the ability to draw robust conclusions in aggregate. More research is needed to understand the intricacy of the gut microbiome and how it relates to IBS symptomatology, but the effectiveness of prebiotic and probiotic agents demonstrated so far implies a worthy therapeutic signal within the noise.

Popular remedies are of ongoing interest to patients experiencing common esophageal symptoms, particularly as typical pharmacologic interventions have been subject to increased scrutiny. Herein we summarize the available data regarding potential risks and benefits of several such remedies. With emphasis on reflux and non-cardiac chest pain, research is ongoing into the clinical utility and diverse physiologic mechanisms underlying a variety of complementary and alternative modalities, including dietary manipulation, apple cider vinegar, melatonin, acupuncture, and various herbal products (rikkunshito, STW 5, slippery elm, licorice, and peppermint oil, among others). A substantial gap persists between anecdotal and empirical understandings of the majority of non-pharmacologic remedies for esophageal symptoms. This landscape of popular treatments nevertheless raises several interesting mechanistic hypotheses and compelling opportunities for future research.

Gastroparesis is a syndrome that can be difficult to treat effectively and likely represents the common clinical presentation of multiple underlying mechanisms. One of these presumed mechanisms involves pyloric dysfunction, tied perhaps to spasm or fibrosis, manifesting as functional gastric outlet obstruction. Various diagnostic modalities have been used to better characterize this hypothesized abnormality, including most recently antroduodenal manometry and impedance planimetry. A variety of therapeutic interventions specific to the pylorus have also been proposed in the last several years, including intrapyloric injections of botulinum toxin, transpyloric stenting, surgical pyloroplasty, and endoscopic pyloromyotomy. The clinical application of these maneuvers has been mostly empiric thus far, but efforts are ongoing to identify the subset of patients whose physiology best positions them to benefit from such therapy. Early results for many of these interventions have been promising and will serve as the basis for larger and more systematic research frameworks moving forward.