1. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign, malignant and pre-malignant gynaecological pathology: relation between surgical outcome and body mass index
- Author
-
Thomas Aust, Claudia Ventii, David Rowlands, Nicola Murray, Nahid Gul, and Vasileios Minas
- Subjects
Laparoscopic surgery ,medicine.medical_specialty ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,General surgery ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Reproductive medicine ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Interventional radiology ,Overweight ,medicine.disease ,Obesity ,Surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Surgical oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Medicine ,medicine.symptom ,Complication ,business ,Body mass index - Abstract
Obesity is having an increasingly significant impact on health care services across the developed world. Although initially laparoscopic surgery was thought to be contraindicated in cases of obesity, surgeons, including gynaecologists, are now routinely performing laparoscopic surgery on obese patients. Limited research has been conducted into the effect of obesity on outcomes of major laparoscopic pelvic surgery. Some authors report worsening outcomes in obese women having laparoscopic hysterectomies; others suggest that complication rates do not increase, but operating times are longer. Here, we report our experience from 250 total laparoscopic hysterectomies performed for benign, malignant and pre-malignant conditions, and we compare outcomes among normal, overweight, obese and morbidly obese patients. We used a composite score index calculated on the basis of operating and theatre times, estimated blood loss, length of stay and number and severity of complications for our comparisons. Our conclusions suggest that meticulous, consistent surgical technique may produce similar outcomes in normal and obese patients having total laparoscopic hysterectomy, with longer operating/theatre times noted only at BMI levels >40.
- Published
- 2016