Search

Cellular plasticity, by large, is the ability through which cells morph into new phenotypic identity by trading-off with the previous one. This phenomenon has been observed in the normal and tumor cells in a very similar fashion. Occurrence of cellular plasticity, in malignancies like epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) are well known but highly debated in terms of origin of the tumor for the inherent heterogeneity across subtypes. EOC has been termed as a clinically challenging malady for its subversive nature against chemotherapy. The management of ovarian cancer is mostly hindered by relapse with recalcitrance towards primary chemotherapy regimen e.g. platinum–taxol combination. Also, late detection preceded by peritoneal metastasis poses another challenge to the treatment. Underlying both these aspects of the disease, tumor heterogeneity turns out as the most critical factor. In the light of heterogeneity that can be across patients (inter-tumoral) and/or within a tumor (intra-tumoral), ovarian carcinoma is a multifactorial ailment. The governing factors behind this heterogeneity are—diverse genetic landscape among subtypes of EOC; the presence of cancer stem cell (CSC) niche and inherent plasticity of the cancer cells themselves. Apart from the well-studied mechanisms of plasticity, there are several emerging molecular players like lncRNAs, Hippo pathway and also phenomena like dedifferentiation of non-CSC neoplastic cells ,and transdifferentiation of CSCs. Here, we present an overview of the current knowledge on the evolution of EOC through cellular plasticity with emphasis on the three major aspects namely, subtype-specific genetic diversity; ovarian CSC and cancer cell duality between epithelial and mesenchymal lineages.

Qualitative studies suggest that social relationships play an important role in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use, but there have been few quantitative assessments of the role of social relationships in PrEP uptake or adherence. We examined the association between disclosure of study participation or LGBT identity and PrEP use in the 1603 HIV-negative participants enrolled in the iPrEx OLE study. We also evaluated the association between LGBT social group involvement and PrEP use. Study participation disclosure to parents and LGBT identity disclosure to anyone in a participant's social network were associated with greater PrEP uptake. Study participation disclosure to partners was associated with higher probability of having protective PrEP drug concentrations compared [risk difference 0.15 95% CI (0.01, 0.30)]. For each additional type of LGBT organization a participant was involved in, the probability of PrEP uptake and having protective drug concentrations increased by 0.04 [95% CI (0.03, 0.06)] and 0.04 (95% CI (0.02, 0.07)] respectively. Overall, social context was associated with PrEP use in iPrEx OLE, and should be taken into consideration when designing future PrEP implementation programs.

We assessed the role of depressive symptoms on adherence to daily oral FTC/TDF for HIV PrEP in cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women who have sex with men (TGW) using data from the iPrEx OLE study. A marginal structural logistic regression model was used to estimate the effect of time-varying CES-D scores on having protective levels of drug concentration, adjusting for confounding by sexual practices over time, prior adherence, and baseline demographic characteristics. We found a non-monotonic relationship between CES-D score and odds of protective FTC/TDF levels in MSM. We found evidence that the effect of depression on adherence varied between MSM and TGW, and that depressive symptoms did not contribute greatly to decreased adherence on a population scale. We recommend that depressive symptoms not preclude the prescription of PrEP, and that MSM and TGW be studied separately.

Monitoring adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is part of the recommended package for PrEP prescribing, yet ongoing concerns about how to do so confidently are exacerbated by gross discrepancies in reported and actual use in clinical trials. We evaluated concordance between reports of recent PrEP dosing collected via neutral interviewing and drug quantitation in the iPrEx open-label extension, where participants (n = 1172) had the choice to receive or not receive PrEP. Self-report of recent dosing (at least one PrEP dose in the past 3-day) was the most common report (84 % of participants), and among these 83 % did have quantifiable levels of drug. The vast majority of those reporting no doses in the past 3-day (16 % of the sample) did not have quantifiable levels of drug (82 %). Predictors of over-report of dosing included younger age and lower educational attainment. Monitoring recent PrEP use through neutral interviewing may be a productive approach for clinicians to consider in implementation of real-world PrEP. Strategies to capture longer term or prevention-effective PrEP use, particularly for younger cohorts, are needed.

We conducted a longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of depressive symptomology in iPrEx, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of daily, oral FTC/TDF HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in men and transgender women who have sex with men. Depression-related adverse events (AEs) were the most frequently reported severe or life-threatening AEs and were not associated with being randomized to the FTC/TDF arm (152 vs. 144 respectively OR 0.66 95 % CI 0.35-1.25). Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) and a four questions suicidal ideation scale scores did not differ by arm. Participants reporting forced sex at anal sexual debut had higher CES-D scores (coeff: 3.23; 95 % CI 1.24-5.23) and were more likely to have suicidal ideation (OR 2.2; 95 % CI 1.09-4.26). CES-D scores were higher among people reporting non-condom receptive anal intercourse (ncRAI) (OR 1.46; 95 % CI 1.09-1.94). We recommend continuing PrEP during periods of depression in conjunction with provision of mental health services.