4 results on '"Laura M. Beaver"'
Search Results
2. Zinc deficiency alters the susceptibility of pancreatic beta cells (INS-1) to arsenic exposure
- Author
-
Laurie G. Hudson, Emily Ho, Carmen P. Wong, Laura M. Beaver, and Annie L Cao
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,DNA damage ,medicine.medical_treatment ,chemistry.chemical_element ,Apoptosis ,Article ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,Arsenic ,Biomaterials ,03 medical and health sciences ,Insulin-Secreting Cells ,Diabetes mellitus ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Animals ,DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded ,Cells, Cultured ,030304 developmental biology ,0303 health sciences ,Chemistry ,Cell growth ,Insulin ,030302 biochemistry & molecular biology ,Metals and Alloys ,medicine.disease ,Rats ,Zinc ,Endocrinology ,Toxicity ,Zinc deficiency ,Beta cell ,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences - Abstract
Pancreatic beta cells produce and release insulin, a hormone that regulates blood glucose levels, and their dysfunction contributes to the development of diabetes mellitus. Zinc deficiency and inorganic arsenic exposure both independently associate with the development of diabetes, although the effects of their combination on pancreatic beta cell health and function remain unknown. We hypothesized zinc deficiency increases the toxicity associated with arsenic exposure, causing an increased susceptibility to DNA damage and disruption of insulin production. Zinc deficiency decreased cell proliferation by 30 percent in pancreatic INS-1 rat insulinoma cells. Arsenic exposure (0, 50 or 500 ppb exposures) significantly decreased cell proliferation, and increased mRNA levels of genes involved in stress response (Mt1, Mt2, Hmox1) and DNA damage (p53, Ogg1). When co-exposed to both zinc deficiency and arsenic, zinc deficiency attenuated this response to arsenic, decreasing the expression of Mt1, Hmox1, and Ogg1, and significantly increasing DNA double-strand breaks 2.9-fold. Arsenic exposure decreased insulin expression, but co-exposure did not decrease insulin levels beyond the arsenic alone condition, but did result in a further 33 percent decline in cell proliferation at the 500 ppb arsenic dose, and a significant increase in beta cell apoptosis. These results suggest zinc deficiency and arsenic, both independently and in combination, adversely affect pancreatic beta cell health and both factors should be considered in the evaluation of health outcomes for susceptible populations.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Epigenetic Regulation by Sulforaphane: Opportunities for Breast and Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention
- Author
-
David E. Williams, Lauren L. Atwell, Jackilen Shannon, Emily Ho, Laura M. Beaver, and Roderick H. Dashwood
- Subjects
Biology ,Pharmacology ,Biochemistry ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Drug Discovery ,Genetics ,medicine ,Epigenetics ,030304 developmental biology ,0303 health sciences ,Tumor microenvironment ,Cruciferous vegetables ,Cancer ,Cell cycle ,medicine.disease ,3. Good health ,chemistry ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Cancer cell ,Cancer research ,Sulforaphane - Abstract
Sulforaphane (SFN) is a phytochemical derived from cruciferous vegetables that has multiple molecular targets and anti-cancer properties. Researchers have demonstrated several chemopreventive benefits of SFN consumption, such as reductions in tumor growth, increases in cancer cell apoptosis, and disruption of signaling within tumor microenvironments both in vitro and in vivo. Emerging evidence indicates that SFN exerts several of its chemopreventive effects by altering epigenetic mechanisms. This review summarizes evidence of the impact of SFN on epigenetic events and how they relate to the chemopreventive effects of SFN observed in preclinical and clinical studies of breast and prostate cancers. Specific areas of focus include the role of SFN in the regulation of cell cycle, apoptosis, inflammation, antioxidant defense, and cancer cell signaling and their relationships to epigenetic mechanisms. Finally, remaining challenges and research needs for translating mechanistic work with SFN into human studies and clinical intervention trials are discussed.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Phytochemicals from Cruciferous Vegetables, Epigenetics, and Prostate Cancer Prevention
- Author
-
David E. Williams, Laura M. Beaver, Emily Ho, Roderick H. Dashwood, and Gregory W. Watson
- Subjects
Male ,Glucoraphanin ,Cruciferous vegetables ,Phytochemicals ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Pharmaceutical Science ,Cancer ,Apoptosis ,Review Article ,Pharmacology ,Biology ,medicine.disease ,Epigenesis, Genetic ,Glucobrassicin ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Prostate cancer ,chemistry ,Detoxification ,Vegetables ,medicine ,Animals ,Humans ,Epigenetics ,Signal Transduction ,Sulforaphane - Abstract
Epidemiological evidence has demonstrated a reduced risk of prostate cancer associated with cruciferous vegetable intake. Follow-up studies have attributed this protective activity to the metabolic products of glucosinolates, a class of secondary metabolites produced by crucifers. The metabolic products of glucoraphanin and glucobrassicin, sulforaphane, and indole-3-carbinol respectively, have been the subject of intense investigation by cancer researchers. Sulforaphane and indole-3-carbinol inhibit prostate cancer by both blocking initiation and suppressing prostate cancer progression in vitro and in vivo. Research has largely focused on the anti-initiation and cytoprotective effects of sulforaphane and indole-3-carbinol through induction of phases I and II detoxification pathways. With regards to suppressive activity, research has focused on the ability of sulforaphane and indole-3-carbinol to antagonize cell signaling pathways known to be dysregulated in prostate cancer. Recent investigations have characterized the ability of sulforaphane and indole-3-carbinol derivatives to modulate the activity of enzymes controlling the epigenetic status of prostate cancer cells. In this review, we will summarize the well-established, “classic” non-epigenetic targets of sulforaphane and indole-3-carbinol, and highlight more recent evidence supporting these phytochemicals as epigenetic modulators for prostate cancer chemoprevention.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.