1. ROC Anatomy—Getting the Most Out of Your Diagnostic Test
- Author
-
Arthur T. Evans, Amiran Baduashvili, and Gordon H. Guyatt
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Diagnostic information ,Clinical Decision-Making ,Myocardial Infarction ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,01 natural sciences ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal Medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Medical physics ,030212 general & internal medicine ,0101 mathematics ,Aged ,Heart Failure ,Likelihood Functions ,Receiver operating characteristic ,Diagnostic Tests, Routine ,business.industry ,010102 general mathematics ,Diagnostic test ,Middle Aged ,Troponin ,Test (assessment) ,ROC Curve ,Laboratory Test Result ,Physical exam ,business ,Receptors, Atrial Natriuretic Factor - Abstract
Clinical decision-making relies heavily on making a correct diagnosis. Clinicians have a responsibility to understand the full spectrum of the diagnostic information conveyed by a physical exam finding, laboratory test result, or imaging. Many laboratory tests, such as troponin and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), are continuous tests with many possible results. Yet, there is a tendency to dichotomize tests into positive and negative, and use sensitivity and specificity to describe the test characteristics. This approach can lead to waste of important diagnostic information and substandard clinical decision-making. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the role of ROC curves in developing a more comprehensive understanding of diagnostic information portrayed by continuous tests to augment clinical decision-making. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11606-019-05125-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF