1. [Untitled]
- Author
-
David R. Price
- Subjects
education.field_of_study ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Population ,Socialist mode of production ,Subsistence agriculture ,Environmental ethics ,Context (language use) ,Malthusianism ,Environmental Science (miscellaneous) ,Consumption (sociology) ,Utopia ,Population growth ,Sociology ,Social science ,education ,Demography ,media_common - Abstract
This essay which analyses the contribution made by Malthus opens by describing the intellectual context offered by the late 18th and early 19th centuries when scientific discoveries and technological advances inspired some thinkers to envision utopia. Malthus wrote his first treatise on population to further a debate with his father. In his essay Malthus elaborated on the ideas of other thinkers about the limits of subsistence and population increase to reveal their socioeconomic implications. Malthus could envision no human means that would prevent population from growing faster than its means of subsistence and he disputed the perfectibility of man or human society. Because of his essay Malthus was appointed professor of political economy at a college in Hertfordshire and spent the rest of his life revising his first effort and publishing another major work. Malthus believed that charity could have a detrimental effect on poverty and that the impoverished would be better served if they were given an opportunity to work or an education. He argued that initiatives to alleviate a problem could exacerbate it if they were based on an inadequate understanding. Malthus affected other thinkers such as Darwin and Wallace Herbert Spencer and Marx (who deplored Malthuss ideas) and blazed a trail of influence into the 20th century. The continued existence of the two opposing views that science can solve all problems and that poverty can not be eliminated may reflect a difference of predisposition rather than the force of reason. The impending crisis caused by unchecked consumption of nonrenewable resources and population growth is of such magnitude today that few are willing to accept its inevitability.
- Published
- 1998
- Full Text
- View/download PDF