Search

Motor imagery requires the covert execution of a movement without any overt motor output. Previous studies indicated that motor imagery results in the prolonged inhibition of motor commands. In the present study, we investigated whether motor imagery also leads to the inhibition of more abstract task representations. To do so, we investigated the effect of motor imagery on n − 2 repetition costs, which offer an index of the extent to which task representations are inhibited. Participants switched among three tasks and among two response modes: overt and covert responding (i.e., motor imagery). N – 2 repetition costs were present when the current trial required an overt response but absent when the current trial required a covert response. Furthermore, n − 2 repetition costs were more pronounced when trial n − 1 required a covert response rather than an overt response. This pattern of results suggests that motor imagery also leads to the inhibition of abstract task representations. We discuss our findings in view of current conceptualizations of motor imagery and argue that the inhibitory mechanism entailed by motor imagery targets more than motor commands alone. Finally, we also relate our findings to the mechanisms underlying the inhibition of task representations.

Recent studies using an induction task paradigm indicated that unconscious automatic processes underlying masked semantic priming are susceptible to cognitive control influences. In this paradigm, participants first perform different induction tasks (semantic decision vs. perceptual decision), which serve to activate a corresponding task set. Thereafter, the masked prime and the target for the lexical decision task is presented. Previously, perceptual and semantic induction tasks were presented in separate blocks, and the response to the induction task was given immediately after the inducing stimulus. The present study, therefore, tested two possible boundary conditions, flexibility of cognitive control and completeness of task set execution, for the emergence of task set effects on masked semantic priming. In the first experiment, perceptual and semantic induction tasks were presented in a randomized fashion, to assess whether task set influences on masked semantic priming can occur on a trial-by-trial basis. The other two experiments tested whether task set effects on masked priming survive, when the response to the induction task is delayed. The present study yielded the same pattern of results irrespective of the variations in the induction task paradigm: When the masked prime was shortly presented after the induction task, masked semantic priming was larger subsequent to the semantic than subsequent to the perceptual induction task. The present study shows that task sets can configure unconscious processing streams rapidly on a trial-by-trial basis and demonstrates the generalizability of cognitive control effects on masked semantic priming across variations of the induction task paradigm.

In task switching, a conflict between competing task-sets is resolved by inhibiting the interfering task-set. Recent models have proposed a framework of the task-set as composed of two hierarchical components: abstract task identity (e.g., respond to quantity) and more concrete task rules (e.g., category-response rules mapping the categories "one" and "three" to the left and right keys, respectively). The present study explored whether task-set inhibition is the outcome of a general control process or whether it reflects multiple inhibitory processes, each targeting a different component of the competing task-set. To this end, two effects of task-set inhibition were examined: backward inhibition (BI), reflecting the suppression of a just-performed task-set that is no longer relevant; and, competitor rule suppression (CRS), reflecting the suppression of an irrelevant task-set that generates a response conflict. In two task switching experiments, each involving three tasks, we asked participants to make two responses: a cue response, indicating the identity of the relevant task (e.g., "Color"), and a target response requiring the implementation of the task rule (e.g., "Red"). The results demonstrate that BI, but not CRS, appears in cue responses, and thus, suggests that BI reflects inhibition that influences representations related to abstract task identity, rather than (just) competing responses or response rules. These results support a dissociation between inhibitory processes in task switching. The current findings also provide further evidence for a multi-component conceptualization of task-set and task-set inhibition.

In task-switching experiments, participants switch between task rules, and each task rule describes how responses are mapped to stimulus information. Importantly, task rules do not pertain to any specific response but to all possible responses. This work examined the hypothesis that task rules, as wholes, rather than (just) specific responses are primed by their execution, such that, in the following trial, response conflicts are exacerbated when the competing responses are generated by these recently primed rules, and performance becomes relatively poor. This hypothesis was supported in two task-switching experiments and re-analyses of additional three published experiments, thus indicating Competitor Rule Priming. Importantly, the Competitor Rule-Priming effect was independent of response repetition vs. switch, suggesting that it reflects the priming of the entire task rule rather than the priming (or suppression) of specific responses. Moreover, this effect was obtained regardless of Backward Inhibition, suggesting these effects are unrelated.

The concept of inhibition plays a major role in cognitive psychology. In the present article, we review the evidence for the inhibition of task sets. In the first part, we critically discuss empirical findings of task inhibition from studies that applied variants of the task-switching methodology and argue that most of these findings— such as switch cost asymmetries—are ambiguous. In the second part, we focus on n-22 task-repetition costs, which currently constitute the most convincing evidence for inhibition of task sets. n-22 repetition costs refer to the performance impairment in sequences of the ABA type relative to CBA, which can be interpreted in terms of persisting inhibition of previously abandoned tasks. The available evidence suggests that inhibition is primarily triggered by conflict at selection of stimulus attributes and at the response level. Author Note

The aim of the present study was to examine the contribution of overlapping response sets to the occurrence of task inhibition, measured as n-2 task repetition cost. We had subjects switch among four tasks. Three tasks overlapped on both stimulus set and response set. A fourth, neutral, univalent task never overlapped on the stimulus set but, across three experiments, varied in terms of the degree of overlap in the response set. We found that overlap in response set affects task inhibition. We suggest that response set overlap increases the competition among tasks and, thus, triggers task inhibition to resolve this competition.

Inhibition of abandoned tasks in task switching can be inferred when a worse performance is found with n - 2 task repetitions (ABA sequences) than with nonrepetitions (CBA sequences). Recent evidence has shown that this inhibition effect decreases with long intertrial intervals (i.e., response-cue intervals, RCIs). Two alternatives have been proposed to account for this decrease. One alternative attributes the observed decrease to the decay of inhibition itself. The other alternative proposes that decay of the activation of competing tasks reduces the interference and leads to less inhibition. To decide between these alternatives, we manipulated RCI trialwise. The results favor the decay-of-activation account as an explanation for the decreased inhibition effect. This links the amount of inhibition to the activation level of the competing tasks, whereas evidence for the decay of inhibition remains weak.

Switching between two tasks afforded by the same stimuli results in slower reactions and more errors on the first stimulus after the task changes. This "switch cost" is reduced, but not usually eliminated, by the opportunity to prepare for a task switch. While there is agreement that this preparation effect indexes a control process performed before the stimulus, the "residual" cost has been attributed to several sources: to a control process essential for task-set reconfiguration that can be carried out only after the stimulus onset, to probabilistic failure to engage in preparation prior to the stimulus, and to two kinds of priming from previous trials: positive priming of the now-irrelevant task set and inhibition of the now-relevant task-set. The main evidence for the carry-over of inhibition is the observation that it is easier to switch from the stronger to the weaker of a pair of tasks afforded by the stimulus than vice versa. We survey available data on interactions between task switching and three manipulations of relative task strength: pre-experimental experience, stimulus-response compatibility, and intra-experimental practice. We conclude that it is far from universally true that it is easier to switch to the weaker task. Either inhibition of the stronger task-set is a strategy used only in the special case of extreme inequality in strength, or its consequences for later performance may be masked by slower post-stimulus control operations for more complex tasks. Inhibitory priming may also be stimulus specific.

This article describes a quantitative model, which suggests what the underlying mechanisms of cognitive control in a particular task-switching paradigm are, with relevance to task-switching performance in general. It is suggested that participants dynamically control response accuracy by selective attention, in the particular paradigm being used, by controlling stimulus representation. They are less efficient in dynamically controlling response representation. The model fits reasonably well the pattern of reaction time results concerning task switching, congruency, cue-target interval and response-repetition in a mixed task condition, as well as the differences between mixed task and pure task conditions.

An investigation was carried out on a preparation of the isolated nervous system of the edible snail of the mechanism of habituation in the network of defense behavior neurons. It was established that the intracellular activation of one of the systems of the defense behavior command neurons, as in the case of the application of the neuropeptide FMRF-amide, leads to a decrease in the amplitude of the postsynaptic potentials in the remaining neurons of this class. An inference is reached, when account is taken of the presence of endogenous FMRF-amide in the defense behavior command neurons, regarding the possibility of active inhibition of the behavioral response to an appropriate stimulus through this neurochemical mechanism of the backward connection. The possible interrelationships with other modulating systems and the significance of such an association in the organization of behavior are discussed.

Focal potentials (FP) elicited by stimulation of collateral-commissural fibers were recorded in the radial and pyramidal layers of the CA1 area in surviving mouse hippocampal slices. The influence of conditioning stimulation on responses in the tested neuronal pathway (the "priming" effect) at 50–1000 msec intervals between the conditioning and test stimuli and variable stimulation strengths was investigated. The relationship of the duration of the FP of the radial layer to the strength of the test stimulation at a 200 msec interval between the conditioning and test stimuli was studied in the first series of experiments. Three different regions of like relationship were distinguished. In region I (weak stimulation) the duration of the FP did not depend on the stimulus strength or on conditioning (i.e., the "priming" effect was not observed). In region II the duration of the FP in the control was shorter as compared with that observed in region I, which is associated with the triggering of the process of feed-forward inhibition. Conditioning led to the partial restoration of the duration of the FP (the "priming" effect, which evidently develops as the result of the suppression of feed-forward inhibition). In region III, by contrast with region II, the stimulation strength was sufficient for the suprathreshold excitation of the pyramidal neurons, which conditioned the development not only of feed-forward, but of feed-backward inhibition as well. The form of the FP in the radial layer is distorted in the process, and their duration cannot serve as an index of "priming." The influence of conditioning on the effect of paired-pulse depression of population peaks in the pyramidal layer was studied in the second series of experiments in order to identify possible changes in feed-backward inhibition. The principal effect consisted in a decrease in paired-pulse depression in the circuits tested; from this the conclusion was drawn of a suppression of feed-backward inhibition. It was concluded that both feed-forward and feed-backward inhibition are suppressed in "priming."

Preconditioning, with a burst of electrical pulse stimuli elevates the threshold for temporal acuity as measured with a technique requiring the S to detect a short gap in an otherwise regular burst of similar stimuli. Only a small amount of backward inhibition can be observed. The temporal duration of the inhibitory effect (up to 700 msec.) suggests that repetitive after-discharges of second-order afferents in Ike spinal cord may underlie this behavioral measure by actually filling in the intervals which are used by the S to make the judgment. The phenomenon is thus thought to be a disruption of a true temporal judgment rather than one indirectly mediated by an amplitude judgment, and as such it represents a significant datum on the temporal resolving power of time dimensions of neural coding.

Two semi-linear models for lateral inhibition are discussed. The interaction between “receptor units” is assumed to be linear, as demonstrated by Hartline and Ratliff in the eye of the horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus. Yet a model of such an inhibitory system must be nonlinear, since the output values correspond to nerve activities, which cannot be negativ. Models with forward inhibition were used often to describe contrast phenomena in the human nervous system. However, in order to simulate the input-output relation in systems similar to the eye of Limulus, a model with backward inhibition must be constructed. Two important properties of backward inhibition not shared by forward inhibition are: (1) Inhibition in a receptor unit has an influence upon its excitation, as well as upon its ability to inhibit other units (Disinhibition). (2) The range of interaction between sensory units is not necessarily the same as the range of direct cross connections. It is shown in this paper, that also forward inhibition may possess these two properties, provided that it is repeated on subsequent levels. Some properties of systems with backward and forward inhibition are studied and compared in models consisting of three units. The input-output relation for large systems with backward inhibition was calculated under special assumptions concerning the inhibitory coefficients. If the inhibitory coefficients in a system with backward inhibition decrease like a power series, as a function of the distance between receptor units, only neighboring receptors have an effect upon each other. That is, in an equivalent system with forward inhibition the inhibitory interaction is confined to neighbouring receptors. Conversely, when backward inhibition exists only between neighbouring receptors, the inhibitory coefficients in an equivalent system with forward inhibition are described, as a function of the distance between the receptor units, by a power series with alternating sign.

1. Responses of pan-directional cells in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus in paralysed anaesthetized rhesus monkeys to stationary flashing stimuli have been studied. 2. The receptive field centre response is always of the transient excitatory on-off type, while the surround response is transient inhibitory both at light-on and at light-off. The receptive field centres are circular or slightly elliptical. The average size of the receptive field centres is much larger than that of retinal ganglion cells. All units except those in the far temporal periphery receive binocular input. In each unit the on and off responses have the same latency times. With increasing stimulus area, the latency time at light-on and at light-off first decreases and then remains constant. In most units the number of spikes in the burst at light-on and at light-off first increases, reaches a maximum and then decreases with increasing stimulus area. This decrease demonstrates the presence of an inhibitory surround. 3. A model of spatial and temporal properties of centre and surround mechanisms is tested. Addition of excitatory centre input and inhibitory surround input, which have different spatial and temporal properties, determines the output of the neurone. The centre mechanism gets excitatory input from retinal ganglion cells and shows saturation. The inhibitory surround mechanism is made by an inhibitory interneurone. It could not be decided whether the excitatory input for this interneurone comes from retinal axon collaterals (forward inhibition) or from axon collaterals of “principal” cells in the superior colliculus (backward inhibition).