Search

Purpose: Survivorship care often refers to continued healthcare after cancer treatment. Jacobsen and colleagues advocated to expand this to include patients on extended treatments and maintenance/prophylactic therapies, recognizing the care continuum as more complex. Transitions of care for individuals diagnosed with a blood cancer can be complicated. We sought to better understand blood cancer caregivers' experiences as their diagnosed family member encountered "survivorship transitions" across the continuum. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with adults caring for a parent or a child with a blood cancer. Caregivers were segmented into survivorship groups based on two transitional contexts: (1) when patients transitioned to a new line of therapy (active treatment or maintenance therapy); (2) when patients ended treatment. We conducted a thematic analysis and triangulated findings to compare transitional experiences. Results: Caregivers in both groups reported experiencing a "new normal," which included personal, relational, and environmental adjustments. Caregivers in the treatment transitions group (n = 23) also described uncertainty challenges (e.g., losing their "safety net") and disrupted expectations (e.g., feeling "caught off guard" by challenges). Whereas caregivers in the end-of-treatment transitions group (n = 15) described relief coupled with worry (e.g., feeling hopeful yet worried). Conclusions: Survivorship transitions for caregivers are riddled with challenges that include difficult readjustments, uncertainty/worry, and unmet expectations. While there seems to be a cohesive experience of "survivorship transitions," each transition group revealed nuanced distinctions. Implications for Cancer Survivors: Tailored supportive resources are needed for caregivers throughout survivorship transitions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Successful transitions of care require communication between inpatient and outpatient physicians. The discharge summary is the main communication tool used by physicians during these transitions. Objective: With the goal of improving care transitions, we explored primary care physicians (PCPs) perspectives on characteristics of high-quality discharge summaries. Design: We conducted semi-structured individual interviews in this qualitative study and surveyed participants for sociodemographic characteristics. Participants: PCPs were recruited from multiple health systems in California. Approach: An interview guide was created by the study authors to solicit PCPs' experiences with discharge summaries and perspectives on four discharge summary templates previously used by large health systems. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and qualitative data were analyzed interactively through thematic analysis. Key Results: Twenty PCPs participated in interviews lasting an average of 35 min (range 26–47 min). Sixty percent were female. Most (70%) had trained in internal medicine (IM); 5% had trained in both IM and pediatrics and 25% in family medicine. Some (45%) participants practiced both inpatient and outpatient medicine; 55% had exclusively outpatient practices. Half worked in university-affiliated clinics, 15% community clinics, 15% public health clinics, 5% private practice, and 15% multiple clinic types. Many PCPs (65%) had been in practice for ≥ 10 years. Participants reported multiple concerns with typical discharge summaries, including frustration with lengthy documents containing information irrelevant to outpatient care. Suggested recommendations included beginning the discharge summary with action items, clear identification of incidental findings requiring follow-up, specifying reasons for any medication changes, and including dates for treatment regimens rather than expected duration of treatment. Participants highlighted the importance of feedback to trainees to assist in crafting succinct discharge summaries containing relevant information. Conclusion: Clinical training programs and healthcare systems must optimize discharge summaries for PCPs to achieve goals of providing high-quality care that improves population health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Oncology patients often struggle to manage their medications and related adverse events during transitions of care. They are expected to take an active role in self-monitoring and timely reporting of their medication safety events or concerns to clinicians. The purpose of this study was to explore the factors influencing oncology patients’ willingness to report adverse events or concerns related to their medication after their transitions back home. Methods: A qualitative interview study was conducted with adult patients with breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer who experienced care transitions within the previous year. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to understand patients’ perceptions of reporting mediation-related safety events or concerns from home. All interviews were conducted via phone calls, recorded, and transcribed for thematic data analysis. Results: A total of 41 individuals participated in the interviews. Three main themes and six subthemes emerged, including patients’ perceived relationship with clinicians (the quality of communication and trust in clinicians), perceived severity of adverse medication events (perceived severe vs. non-severe events), and patient activation in self-management (self-efficacy in self-management and engagement in monitoring health outcomes). Conclusion: The patient-clinician relationship significantly affects patients’ reporting behaviors, which can potentially interact with other factors, including the severity of adverse events. It is important to engage oncology patients in medication safety self-reporting from home by enhancing health communication, understanding patients’ perceptions of severe events, and promoting patient activation. By addressing these efforts, healthcare providers should adopt a more patient-centered approach to enhance the overall quality and safety of oncological care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Over one in five Medicare patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are re-hospitalized within 30 days of discharge. Poor communication between the hospital and SNF upon hospital discharge is frequently cited as the most common cause of readmission. Aim: The goal of this program was to assess the ability of a weekly post-discharge hospitalist led virtual rounding program to augment the written discharge summary sent to SNFs. Setting: Two academic hospitals and six SNFs in Baltimore, MD. Participants: Hospitalists and medical directors or directors of nursing from the partner SNF. Program Description: During weekly encounters, the hospitalist and SNF providers discussed the clinical status, discharge medications, treatment plan, and follow-up care of all discharged patients. The intervention took place from July 2021 to December 2021. Program Evaluation: During the study, 544 patients were discussed in a post-discharge virtual encounter. After the discussions, hospitalists identified clinically significant errors in 124 discharge summaries. A survey of participating hospitalists and SNF medical and nursing leadership indicated the intervention was thought to improve care transitions. Discussion: Our innovation was successful in identifying errors in discharge summaries and was thought to improve the transition of care by participating SNF and hospitalist providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Antipsychotic medications do not alter the incidence or duration of delirium, but these medications are frequently prescribed and continued at transitions of care in critically ill patients when they may no longer be necessary or appropriate. Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify and describe relevant domains and constructs that influence antipsychotic medication prescribing and deprescribing practices among physicians, nurses, and pharmacists that care for critically ill adult patients during and following critical illness. Design: We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with critical care and ward healthcare professionals including physicians, nurses, and pharmacists to understand antipsychotic prescribing and deprescribing practices for critically ill adult patients during and following critical illness. Participants: Twenty-one interviews were conducted with 11 physicians, five nurses, and five pharmacists from predominantly academic centres in Alberta, Canada, between July 6 and October 29, 2021. Main Measures: We used deductive thematic analysis using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify and describe constructs within relevant domains. Key Results: Seven TDF domains were identified as relevant from the analysis: Social/Professional role and identity; Beliefs about capabilities; Reinforcement; Motivations and goals; Memory, attention, and decision processes; Environmental context and resources; and Beliefs about consequences. Participants reported antipsychotic prescribing for multiple indications beyond delirium and agitation including patient and staff safety, sleep management, and environmental factors such as staff availability and workload. Participants identified potential antipsychotic deprescribing strategies to reduce ongoing antipsychotic medication prescriptions for critically ill patients including direct communication tools between prescribers at transitions of care. Conclusions: Critical care and ward healthcare professionals report several factors influencing established antipsychotic medication prescribing practices. These factors aim to maintain patient and staff safety to facilitate the provision of care to patients with delirium and agitation limiting adherence to current guideline recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing upon hospital discharge has been identified as a significant problem. Despite high rates of antibiotic prescription errors, there is no widely accepted antimicrobial stewardship initiative to prevent such errors. Aim: The primary objective of this study was to determine the impact of hospital-based clinical pharmacist discharge prescription review on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions. Method: This was an observational study comparing the appropriateness of hospital discharge antibiotic prescriptions between two similar internal medicine services. One cohort of patients was admitted to medicine services where rounding clinical pharmacists performed routine antibiotic discharge assessment, and the comparator cohort was admitted to hospitalist services without routine pharmacist discharge antibiotic review. Results: Our study included 150 cases per cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for increased age (p = 0.025) and fewer cases of acute bacterial skin & skin structure infections (p = 0.001) in the hospitalist cohort. Antibiotic appropriateness was considerably greater in the medicine (pharmacist) group versus hospitalist group [(83% versus 54%, respectively (p < 0.00001)]. The difference in appropriateness was mainly driven by pneumonia and urinary tract infection prescriptions. Conclusion: Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions significantly improved in the setting of pharmacist discharge review. This initiative highlights the important role of clinical pharmacists in outpatient antimicrobial stewardship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Numerous patients have cultures pending at discharge which, if not addressed, may delay diagnosis and initiation of appropriate antimicrobials. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the appropriateness of discharge antimicrobial therapy and result documentation in patients with positive cultures finalized post-discharge. Methods: This was a cross-sectional cohort study of patients admitted from July 1 to December 31, 2019 with positive sterile-site microbiologic cultures finalized post-discharge. Pertinent inclusion and exclusion factors were admission ≥ 48 h and non-sterile sites, respectively. The primary objective was to determine the frequency of discharged patients warranting antimicrobial changes based on finalized cultures. Secondary objectives included prevalence and timeliness of result documentation and rates of 30-day readmission, among intervention warranted versus not warranted. Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were used as appropriate. Binary multivariable logistic regression was completed for 30-day readmission stratified by infectious disease (ID) involvement due to the potential for effect modification. Results: A total of 208 of 768 patients screened were included. Most patients were discharged from a surgical service (45.7%); deep tissue and blood were the most common culture sites (29.3%). Change in discharge antimicrobial was warranted in 36.5% of patients (n = 76). Result documentation was overall low (35.5%). Time to documentation was significantly shorter in patients warranting antimicrobial intervention (4 days vs. 9 days, P = 0.039), although rates of hospital readmission were higher in this group (32.9% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.109). Finally, in patients not being followed by ID, documentation of finalized results was associated with decreased odds of 30-day readmission (aOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07–0.53). Conclusions: A significant number of patients with cultures finalized post-discharge warranted antimicrobial intervention. Acknowledgment of finalized culture results may decrease the risk of 30-day hospital readmission, particularly in patients not followed by ID. Quality improvement efforts should focus on methods to improve documentation and action on pending cultures to positively impact patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), especially those treated with methadone, face significant challenges to placement in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Efforts to address this via legal actions have not resulted in improved access.To understand regulatory and non-regulatory factors that impact SNF placement of patients with OUD treated with methadone.Observational qualitative study.Stakeholders in the hospital-to-SNF referral process as well as those with specific expertise related to OUD.Open-ended, semi-structured interviews.Interviews with 15 participants identified three key themes that function together in addition to logistic and financial barriers: (1) stigma and perception of risk, (2) uncertain regulatory environment, and (3) distrust between responsible entities. Fundamentally, many SNFs do not feel they can provide necessary care related to OUD and methadone. They tend to be disinclined to care for patients with OUD and express concerns about perceived risks such as overdose, violence, or discomfort to other residents. SNFs are also very motivated to avoid regulatory citations and fines related to OUD or methadone. Since confusion and misinformation about relevant policies and procedures is common, many opt to decline these patients. Compounding these challenges, entities responsible for coordinating care demonstrate poor communication and lack of transparency with each other. Referral and declination information sent between hospitals and SNFs is often considered to be incomplete or incorrect, and many hospitals have stopped referring patients with OUD treated with methadone to SNFs altogether. Regulatory bodies are often feared by healthcare providers and administrators and interaction is avoided. Finally, legal oversight representatives report that they do not receive sufficient information to properly investigate concerns.This study identifies the climate of stigma, uncertainty, and distrust between responsible entities that stymies improvement efforts. Creation of meaningful reform must address each of these areas.Objective: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), especially those treated with methadone, face significant challenges to placement in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Efforts to address this via legal actions have not resulted in improved access.To understand regulatory and non-regulatory factors that impact SNF placement of patients with OUD treated with methadone.Observational qualitative study.Stakeholders in the hospital-to-SNF referral process as well as those with specific expertise related to OUD.Open-ended, semi-structured interviews.Interviews with 15 participants identified three key themes that function together in addition to logistic and financial barriers: (1) stigma and perception of risk, (2) uncertain regulatory environment, and (3) distrust between responsible entities. Fundamentally, many SNFs do not feel they can provide necessary care related to OUD and methadone. They tend to be disinclined to care for patients with OUD and express concerns about perceived risks such as overdose, violence, or discomfort to other residents. SNFs are also very motivated to avoid regulatory citations and fines related to OUD or methadone. Since confusion and misinformation about relevant policies and procedures is common, many opt to decline these patients. Compounding these challenges, entities responsible for coordinating care demonstrate poor communication and lack of transparency with each other. Referral and declination information sent between hospitals and SNFs is often considered to be incomplete or incorrect, and many hospitals have stopped referring patients with OUD treated with methadone to SNFs altogether. Regulatory bodies are often feared by healthcare providers and administrators and interaction is avoided. Finally, legal oversight representatives report that they do not receive sufficient information to properly investigate concerns.This study identifies the climate of stigma, uncertainty, and distrust between responsible entities that stymies improvement efforts. Creation of meaningful reform must address each of these areas.Design: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), especially those treated with methadone, face significant challenges to placement in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Efforts to address this via legal actions have not resulted in improved access.To understand regulatory and non-regulatory factors that impact SNF placement of patients with OUD treated with methadone.Observational qualitative study.Stakeholders in the hospital-to-SNF referral process as well as those with specific expertise related to OUD.Open-ended, semi-structured interviews.Interviews with 15 participants identified three key themes that function together in addition to logistic and financial barriers: (1) stigma and perception of risk, (2) uncertain regulatory environment, and (3) distrust between responsible entities. Fundamentally, many SNFs do not feel they can provide necessary care related to OUD and methadone. They tend to be disinclined to care for patients with OUD and express concerns about perceived risks such as overdose, violence, or discomfort to other residents. SNFs are also very motivated to avoid regulatory citations and fines related to OUD or methadone. Since confusion and misinformation about relevant policies and procedures is common, many opt to decline these patients. Compounding these challenges, entities responsible for coordinating care demonstrate poor communication and lack of transparency with each other. Referral and declination information sent between hospitals and SNFs is often considered to be incomplete or incorrect, and many hospitals have stopped referring patients with OUD treated with methadone to SNFs altogether. Regulatory bodies are often feared by healthcare providers and administrators and interaction is avoided. Finally, legal oversight representatives report that they do not receive sufficient information to properly investigate concerns.This study identifies the climate of stigma, uncertainty, and distrust between responsible entities that stymies improvement efforts. Creation of meaningful reform must address each of these areas.Participants: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), especially those treated with methadone, face significant challenges to placement in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Efforts to address this via legal actions have not resulted in improved access.To understand regulatory and non-regulatory factors that impact SNF placement of patients with OUD treated with methadone.Observational qualitative study.Stakeholders in the hospital-to-SNF referral process as well as those with specific expertise related to OUD.Open-ended, semi-structured interviews.Interviews with 15 participants identified three key themes that function together in addition to logistic and financial barriers: (1) stigma and perception of risk, (2) uncertain regulatory environment, and (3) distrust between responsible entities. Fundamentally, many SNFs do not feel they can provide necessary care related to OUD and methadone. They tend to be disinclined to care for patients with OUD and express concerns about perceived risks such as overdose, violence, or discomfort to other residents. SNFs are also very motivated to avoid regulatory citations and fines related to OUD or methadone. Since confusion and misinformation about relevant policies and procedures is common, many opt to decline these patients. Compounding these challenges, entities responsible for coordinating care demonstrate poor communication and lack of transparency with each other. Referral and declination information sent between hospitals and SNFs is often considered to be incomplete or incorrect, and many hospitals have stopped referring patients with OUD treated with methadone to SNFs altogether. Regulatory bodies are often feared by healthcare providers and administrators and interaction is avoided. Finally, legal oversight representatives report that they do not receive sufficient information to properly investigate concerns.This study identifies the climate of stigma, uncertainty, and distrust between responsible entities that stymies improvement efforts. Creation of meaningful reform must address each of these areas.Approach: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), especially those treated with methadone, face significant challenges to placement in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Efforts to address this via legal actions have not resulted in improved access.To understand regulatory and non-regulatory factors that impact SNF placement of patients with OUD treated with methadone.Observational qualitative study.Stakeholders in the hospital-to-SNF referral process as well as those with specific expertise related to OUD.Open-ended, semi-structured interviews.Interviews with 15 participants identified three key themes that function together in addition to logistic and financial barriers: (1) stigma and perception of risk, (2) uncertain regulatory environment, and (3) distrust between responsible entities. Fundamentally, many SNFs do not feel they can provide necessary care related to OUD and methadone. They tend to be disinclined to care for patients with OUD and express concerns about perceived risks such as overdose, violence, or discomfort to other residents. SNFs are also very motivated to avoid regulatory citations and fines related to OUD or methadone. Since confusion and misinformation about relevant policies and procedures is common, many opt to decline these patients. Compounding these challenges, entities responsible for coordinating care demonstrate poor communication and lack of transparency with each other. Referral and declination information sent between hospitals and SNFs is often considered to be incomplete or incorrect, and many hospitals have stopped referring patients with OUD treated with methadone to SNFs altogether. Regulatory bodies are often feared by healthcare providers and administrators and interaction is avoided. Finally, legal oversight representatives report that they do not receive sufficient information to properly investigate concerns.This study identifies the climate of stigma, uncertainty, and distrust between responsible entities that stymies improvement efforts. Creation of meaningful reform must address each of these areas.Results: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), especially those treated with methadone, face significant challenges to placement in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Efforts to address this via legal actions have not resulted in improved access.To understand regulatory and non-regulatory factors that impact SNF placement of patients with OUD treated with methadone.Observational qualitative study.Stakeholders in the hospital-to-SNF referral process as well as those with specific expertise related to OUD.Open-ended, semi-structured interviews.Interviews with 15 participants identified three key themes that function together in addition to logistic and financial barriers: (1) stigma and perception of risk, (2) uncertain regulatory environment, and (3) distrust between responsible entities. Fundamentally, many SNFs do not feel they can provide necessary care related to OUD and methadone. They tend to be disinclined to care for patients with OUD and express concerns about perceived risks such as overdose, violence, or discomfort to other residents. SNFs are also very motivated to avoid regulatory citations and fines related to OUD or methadone. Since confusion and misinformation about relevant policies and procedures is common, many opt to decline these patients. Compounding these challenges, entities responsible for coordinating care demonstrate poor communication and lack of transparency with each other. Referral and declination information sent between hospitals and SNFs is often considered to be incomplete or incorrect, and many hospitals have stopped referring patients with OUD treated with methadone to SNFs altogether. Regulatory bodies are often feared by healthcare providers and administrators and interaction is avoided. Finally, legal oversight representatives report that they do not receive sufficient information to properly investigate concerns.This study identifies the climate of stigma, uncertainty, and distrust between responsible entities that stymies improvement efforts. Creation of meaningful reform must address each of these areas.Conclusion: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), especially those treated with methadone, face significant challenges to placement in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Efforts to address this via legal actions have not resulted in improved access.To understand regulatory and non-regulatory factors that impact SNF placement of patients with OUD treated with methadone.Observational qualitative study.Stakeholders in the hospital-to-SNF referral process as well as those with specific expertise related to OUD.Open-ended, semi-structured interviews.Interviews with 15 participants identified three key themes that function together in addition to logistic and financial barriers: (1) stigma and perception of risk, (2) uncertain regulatory environment, and (3) distrust between responsible entities. Fundamentally, many SNFs do not feel they can provide necessary care related to OUD and methadone. They tend to be disinclined to care for patients with OUD and express concerns about perceived risks such as overdose, violence, or discomfort to other residents. SNFs are also very motivated to avoid regulatory citations and fines related to OUD or methadone. Since confusion and misinformation about relevant policies and procedures is common, many opt to decline these patients. Compounding these challenges, entities responsible for coordinating care demonstrate poor communication and lack of transparency with each other. Referral and declination information sent between hospitals and SNFs is often considered to be incomplete or incorrect, and many hospitals have stopped referring patients with OUD treated with methadone to SNFs altogether. Regulatory bodies are often feared by healthcare providers and administrators and interaction is avoided. Finally, legal oversight representatives report that they do not receive sufficient information to properly investigate concerns.This study identifies the climate of stigma, uncertainty, and distrust between responsible entities that stymies improvement efforts. Creation of meaningful reform must address each of these areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: More than 70% of patients continue to use opioid medications 3-weeks following total knee arthroplasty. Post-discharge pharmacist reviews improve medication management, however it's effect on opioid usage is not known. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of post-discharge pharmacist review on opioid use following a total knee arthroplasty. Method: A pilot, cohort pre- and post-intervention study was undertaken on patients who had undergone a total knee arthroplasty and were supplied an opioid upon discharge from hospital. During the intervention, patients were contacted via telephone by a pharmacist approximately five days post-discharge to review analgesic usage, provide education and advice and communicate an opioid management plan to their general practitioner. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients taking opioids 3-weeks post-discharge. Secondary endpoints included: percentage of patients obtaining an opioid refill; patient satisfaction with opioid supply and the pharmacist review. Results: Pre- and post-intervention, 63 and 44 patients were included, respectively. The percentage of patients taking opioids 3-weeks post-discharge declined from 74.6 to 29.6% (p < 0.001) and the percentage requiring an opioid refill from their general practitioner declined from 71.4 to 36.4% (p < 0.001). More patients were satisfied with opioid supply during the intervention period (79.5% cf. 47.6%, p = 0.001). Twenty-eight (63.6%) patients could recall the post-discharge pharmacist review, and all were either satisfied or extremely satisfied with the review. Conclusion: Pharmacist-delivered post-discharge analgesia review reduced the percentage of patients taking opioids 3-weeks post-discharge following a total knee arthroplasty. This intervention has the potential to provide a smoother transition of care for patients supplied with opioids at the time of hospital discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System Rural Transitions Nurse Program (TNP) addresses barriers veterans face when transitioning from urban tertiary VA hospitals to home. Previous clinical evaluations of TNP have shown that enrolled veterans were more likely to follow up with their primary care provider within 14 days of discharge and experience a significant reduction in mortality within 30 days compared to propensity-score matched controls. Objective: Examine changes from pre- to post-hospitalization in total, inpatient, and outpatient 30-day healthcare utilization costs for TNP enrollees compared to controls. Design: Quantitative analyses modeling the changes in cost via multivariable linear mixed-effects models to determine the association between TNP enrollment and changes in these costs. Participants: Veterans meeting TNP eligibility criteria who were discharged home following an inpatient hospitalization at one of the 11 implementation sites from April 2017 to September 2019. Intervention: The four-step TNP transitional care intervention. Main Measures: Changes in 30-day total, inpatient, and outpatient healthcare utilization costs were calculated for TNP enrollees and controls. Key Results: Among 3001 TNP enrollees and 6002 controls, no statistically significant difference in the change in total costs (p = 0.65, 95% CI: (− $675, $350)) was identified. However, on average, the increase in inpatient costs from pre- to post-hospitalization was approximately $549 less for TNP enrollees (p = 0.02, 95% CI: (− $856, − $246)). The average increase in outpatient costs from pre- to post-hospitalization was approximately $421 more for TNP enrollees compared to controls (p = 0.003, 95% CI: ($109, $671)). Conclusions: Although we found no difference in change in total costs between veterans enrolled in TNP and controls, TNP was associated with a smaller increase in direct inpatient medical costs and a larger increase in direct outpatient medical costs. This suggests a shifting of costs from the inpatient to outpatient setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with invasive candidiasis (IC) have complex medical and infectious disease problems that often require continued care after discharge. This study aimed to assess echinocandin use at hospital discharge and develop a transition of care (TOC) model to facilitate discharge for patients with IC. This was a mixed method study design that used epidemiologic assessment to better understand echinocandin use at hospital discharge TOC. Using grounded theory methodology focused on patients given echinocandins during their last day of hospitalization, a TOC model for patients with IC, the invasive candidiasis [I Can] discharge model was developed to better understand discharge barriers. A total of 33% (1405/4211) echinocandin courses were continued until the last day of hospitalization. Of 536 patients chosen for in-depth review, 220 (41%) were discharged home, 109 (20%) were transferred, and 207 (39%) died prior to discharge. Almost half (46%, 151/329) of patients discharged alive received outpatient echinocandin therapy. Independent predictors for outpatient echinocandin use were osteomyelitis (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.1–15.7; p = 0.04), other deep-seated infection (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.7–12.0; p = 0.003), and non-home discharge location (OR, 3.9, 95% CI, 2.0–7.7; p < 0.001). The I Can discharge model was developed encompassing four distinct themes which was used to identify potential barriers to discharge. Significant echinocadin use occurs at hospital discharge TOC. The I Can discharge model may help clinical, policy, and research decision-making processes to facilitate smoother and earlier hospital discharges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic condition that leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Management of COPD hospitalizations utilizing an evidence-based care bundle can provide consistent quality of care and may reduce readmissions. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated readmission rates in patients hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation. Patients in the pre-intervention cohort received usual care, while patients in the post-intervention cohort received an innovative inpatient COPD care bundle. The bundle focused on optimizing care in five areas: consults, inpatient interventions, education, transitions of care, and after discharge care. Results: In this study, 149 subjects were included in the pre-intervention cohort and 214 subjects were included in the post-intervention cohort. Thirty-day readmission rates were lower in the post-intervention cohort compared to the pre-intervention cohort, 22.4% vs. 38.3% (p = 0.001). A reduction in 60-day and 90-day readmission rates was also observed, 13.7% vs. 40.3% (p < 0.001) and 10.1% vs. 32.2% (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Bundled care is an effective and inexpensive method for institutions to provide consistent and quality care. The findings of this study demonstrate that the implementation of a COPD care bundle is an effective strategy to decrease hospital readmissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Medication errors can occur because of incomplete or poorly communicated information at the transition from hospital to community. Following an audit in 2016, a project was undertaken to determine if pharmacists could improve the quality of medication information in discharge summaries by introducing a discharge medication reconciliation process. Pharmacists recorded any changes to the patient's medication in the electronic prescribing system during their inpatient stay and summarised these changes on discharge. Objective To compare medication information in discharge summaries with recognised standards for the clinical structure and content of patient records, and to assess the impact of the pharmacist process on compliance with certain elements of these standards. Setting A 750 bed teaching district general hospital in England. Method A retrospective observational study examining all patient discharge summaries over a 1 week period for compliance to national standards. Main outcome measure The main outcome measures were compliance with standards for medication started, stopped or changed in hospital and any differences between extent of recording this information by doctors and pharmacists. Results Data were collected and analysed for 243 patients, of whom 94 (38.7%) attracted a discharge medicines reconciliation process by a pharmacist. Discharge summaries were compliant with basic standards for changed medication in 42% of patients or 51.4% with the input of a pharmacist. This increase of 9.4% was statistically significant (p = 0.0365). At an enhanced level, pharmacists increased compliance from 39.1 to 46.5%, this did not represent a significant increase (p = 0.0989). Conclusion Pharmacists undertaking a discharge medication reconciliation process significantly improves the quality of discharge summaries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Between 2015 and 2019, 261,091 refugees were resettled through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program. Few are chronically ill, but previously these went to emergency rooms upon arrival. We designed a pilot program to anticipate, assess, and safely assume care of chronic health needs and stabilize sick and medically complex refugees upon arrival. Clinical Operations: Academic internal medicine and pediatrics clinics are linked to the Washington State Refugee Health Program and Refugee Resettlement Agencies. Arriving refugees deemed medically complex through overseas medical evaluation or post-arrival were selected for the program. Metrics: We reviewed biodata of 2,947 refugees deemed medically complex. We referred five hundred and sixty one (19%) of these for evaluation, and 257 (46%) of referrals received care. Discussion: Safe transitions of care are standard practice in medical systems. This innovation in Seattle is one example of a system for the safe and cost-effective relocation of refugees with complex illnesses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) experience frequent readmissions; however, studies focused on patients' and caregivers' perceptions of their transitional care experiences to identify root causes of burdensome transitions of care are lacking. Aim: To explore the transitional care experiences of patients with ESLD and their caregivers in order to identify their supportive care needs. Methods: We conducted interviews with 15 patients with ESLD and 14 informal caregivers. We used semi-structured interview guides to explore their experiences since the diagnosis of ESLD including their care transitions. Two raters coded interviews independently (κ = 0.95) using template analysis. Results: Participants reported feeling unprepared to manage their informational, psychosocial, and practical care needs as they transitioned from hospital to home after the diagnosis of ESLD. Delay in the timely receipt of supportive care services addressing these care needs resulted in hospital readmissions, emotional distress, caregiver burnout, reduced work capacity, and financial hardship. Participants shared the following resources that they perceived would improve their quality of care: (1) discharge checklist, (2) online resources, (3) mental health support, (4) caregiver support and training, and (5) financial navigation. Conclusion: Transitional care models that attend to the informational, psychosocial, and practical domains of care are needed to better support patients with ESLD and their caregivers at the time of diagnosis and beyond. Without attending to the multidimensional care needs of newly diagnosed patients with ESLD and their caregivers, they are at risk of burdensome transitions of care, high healthcare utilization, and poor health-related quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are currently no evidence-based guidelines that provide standardized criteria for the discharge of COVID-19 patients from the hospital.Objective: To address this gap in practice guidance, we reviewed published guidance and collected discharge protocols and procedures to identify and synthesize common practices.Design: Rapid review of existing guidance from US and non-US public health organizations and professional societies and qualitative review using content analysis of discharge documents collected from a national sample of US academic medical centers with follow-up survey of hospital leaders SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We reviewed 65 websites for major professional societies and public health organizations and collected documents from 22 Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) in the US participating in the HOspital MEdicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN).Results: We synthesized data regarding common practices around 5 major domains: (1) isolation and transmission mitigation; (2) criteria for discharge to non-home settings including skilled nursing, assisted living, or homeless; (3) clinical criteria for discharge including oxygenation levels, fever, and symptom improvement; (4) social support and ability to perform activities of daily living; (5) post-discharge instructions, monitoring, and follow-up.Limitations: We used streamlined methods for rapid review of published guidance and collected discharge documents only in a focused sample of US academic medical centers.Conclusion: AMCs studied showed strong consensus on discharge practices for COVID-19 patients related to post-discharge isolation and transmission mitigation for home and non-home settings. There was high concordance among AMCs that discharge practices should address COVID-19-specific factors in clinical, functional, and post-discharge monitoring domains although definitions and details varied. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Safely and effectively discharging a patient from the hospital requires working within a multidisciplinary team. However, little is known about how perceptions of responsibility among the team impact discharge communication practices.Objective: Our study attempts to understand residents' perceptions of who is primarily responsible for discharge education, how these perceptions affect their own reported communication with patients, and how residents envision improving multidisciplinary communication around discharges.Design: A multi-institutional cross-sectional survey.Participants: Internal medicine (IM) residents from seven US residency programs at academic medical centers were invited to participate between March and May 2019, via email of an electronic link to the survey.Main Measures: Data collected included resident perception of who on the multidisciplinary team is primarily responsible for discharge communication, their own reported discharge communication practices, and open-ended comments on ways discharge multidisciplinary team communication could be improved.Key Results: Of the 613 resident responses (63% response rate), 35% reported they were unsure which member of the multidisciplinary team is primarily responsible for discharge education. Residents who believed it was either the intern's or the resident's primary responsibility had 4.28 (95% CI, 2.51-7.30) and 3.01 (95% CI, 1.66-5.71) times the odds, respectively, of reporting doing discharge communication practices frequently compared to those who were not sure who was primarily responsible. To improve multidisciplinary discharge communication, residents called for the following among team members: (1) clarifying roles and responsibilities for communication with patients, (2) setting expectations for communication among multidisciplinary team members, and (3) redefining culture around discharges.Conclusions: Residents report a lack of understanding of who is responsible for discharge education. This diffusion of ownership impacts how much residents invest in patient education, with more perceived responsibility associated with more frequent discharge communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hospital discharge has a significant impact on the continuity of care for people living with dementia. Clear guidance on medication management should be provided to caregivers of people living with dementia to ensure appropriate use of medications post-discharge. Aim: Identify and appraise the impact of interventions at hospital discharge to guide caregivers in the medication management for people living with dementia. Method: A systematic search of original studies was performed in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. Articles published in English that reported on interventions to guide caregivers in medication management for people living with dementia were included. Two authors independently reviewed titles and abstract. Full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and quality assessment was conducted by two authors. Results: A total of five studies were included with a range of interventions that were typically delivered post-discharge by a multidisciplinary team and most targeted administration of medications by caregivers. Overall, three types of discharge interventions were identified including a pre-discharge caregiver educational intervention, a post-discharge multidisciplinary team intervention, and discharge summary documentation intervention at transitions of care. Of these, a pre-discharge caregiver education led to shorter hospital stay (25 days vs. 31 days, p = 0.005). A post-discharge intervention that included follow-up visits resulted in lower use of high-risk medications (19% vs. 40%), and reduction in 30-day re-hospitalization rates (11% vs. 20%). In contrast, in another post-discharge intervention study, no difference in one-month re-hospitalization rates (8.4% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.82) was demonstrated. In another study, a post-discharge hospital educational program provided to caregivers led to significantly reduced caregiver burden (31.7 ± 17.6 (SD) pre-intervention to 27.7 ± 16.9 (SD) post-intervention (p = 0.037)). Discussion: Current findings suggest there is a need for well-designed interventions to guide caregivers in all aspects of medication management for people living with dementia, and should include support for caregivers in care coordination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The Transit Care Hub (TCH) is an inpatient ward traditionally used as a waiting area for patients who require transport to return home. In July 2018, a six-month pilot of a TCH pharmacist was funded to improve the flow of patients through the hospital. Setting Major Australian teaching hospital. Objective(s) To determine the effect that the TCH pharmacist had on patient flow within the hospital and on the time saved for other clinical pharmacists, as well as estimating cost savings. Methods A service delivery framework for the TCH pharmacist was developed and tested. This involved a proactive approach to patient discharge with ward-based staff. Data were collected from July to November 2018, 20 weeks prior to and 20 weeks after the commencement of the pilot. Main outcome measure Measurements included the number of best possible medication histories (BPMHs) completed during admission, improvements in arrival time to TCH from inpatient wards and cost savings. Results During the pilot study period (20 weeks), 791 patients were discharged by the TCH pharmacist, arriving an average of 70 minutes earlier than other patients discharging through TCH. There was a 16% increase in patients discharging through TCH which released ward beds. The TCH pharmacist increased the number of BPMHs on day of admission by 14%. There was an estimated annual saving of AU$252,008 for the hospital. Conclusions The TCH pharmacist service enhanced patient flow by coordinating earlier discharges, increasing the timely completion of BPMHs, and saving ward pharmacist time. Significant cost savings supported a permanently funded position. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Medication errors at different transitions of care are common and potentially harmful. Medication reconciliation process should be evaluated to reduce the unintentional discrepancies. Objective This study aims to identify and classify unintentional medication discrepancies at hospital admission and discharge and associated risk factors. Setting Two general internal medicine and a pulmonology wards of an Italian non-academic hospital. Method A retrospective observational study was conducted among adult patients admitted to the wards. In order to evaluate the current medication reconciliation process of these wards, the frequency and type of unintentional chronic medication discrepancies between the physician assessment of home medication and hospital admission and discharge prescriptions were studied. Patients' characteristic associated with the presence of at least one unintentional discrepancy were evaluated. Main outcome measure Frequencies of unintentional medication discrepancies upon admission and discharge and associated patients' characteristics. Results Among the 144 patients enrolled in the study, 53 and 64 unintentional medication discrepancies were identified at hospital admission and at discharge, respectively. Both at admission and discharge a quarter of patients had at least one unintentional discrepancy. 'Medication omission' was the most frequent type of discrepancy identified and respiratory system and nervous system were the classes of medication with the highest rate of unintentional discrepancies. Unintentional discrepancies were more likely to occur in patients receiving more medicine pre-admission, longer hospitalization stays and coming from or discharged to a nursing home. Conclusion Transitions of care are critical moments for patient safety in terms of unintentional medication discrepancies and a more structured medication reconciliation process is needed. The medication reconciliation process should be considered in terms of a multidisciplinary approach involving all health professionals as well as patients and caregivers directly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patient perceptions of the causes of preoperative symptoms, expected impact of surgery on symptoms and anticipated timeline of recovery are likely to affect the risk of readmission following elective surgical procedures. However, these perceptions have not been studied. A qualitative study was designed to explore these perceptions, using the common-sense model of self-regulation (CSM) as the conceptual framework. CSM is grounded in illness representations, describing how patients make sense of changes in physical well-being (e.g. symptoms) and develop and assess management plans. It also establishes a broader framework for examining patients' a priori expectations and timelines for outcomes based on comparisons to prior experiences and underlying self-prototypes, or "Self as Anchor". A convenience sample of 14 patients aged 56–81 who underwent elective surgery was recruited. Semi-structured interviews informed by the CSM were completed on the day of discharge. Content analysis with deductive coding was used, and emerging themes were fit to components of the CSM, including the five domains of Illness Representations—identity, cause, timeline, control, and consequences. Two additional themes, outlook (toward the health care system, providers and recovery efforts), and motivation (external or internal for recovering), relate to self-prototypes, expectations for outcomes, and search for coherence. Misattribution of symptoms, unrealistic expectations for outcomes (e.g. expecting complete resolution of symptoms unrelated to the surgical procedure) and timelines for recovery (unrealistically short), and the (baseline) "normal healthy self" as distinct from the (temporarily) "sick self" were recurrent themes. Findings suggest that patient perceptions and the actual recovery process may be misaligned. The results underscore the importance of assessing patients' perceptions and expectations, actively engaging patients in their own healthcare, and providing adequate support during the transition to home. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, as the era of deepening healthcare reform in China progresses, there is a gradual development of ambulatory care pharmacy practice. This commentary reviews the current state of ambulatory care pharmacy practice in China and discusses future efforts to advance the practice. Areas of focus include practice standardization, transitions of care, and reimbursements of ambulatory care pharmacy practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Medication errors frequently occur during transitions of care and may have damaging consequences, especially amongst the elderly. Some studies show that quality improvement initiatives with a focus on medication reconciliation have resulted in better health outcomes and a reduced number of readmissions. Objective The primary objective of this study was to quantify and classify medication reconciliation errors detected by a pharmacist and taking place during transitions of care between nursing homes and the health system. Secondary objectives were to assess the relation between error frequency and polypharmacy or between error frequency and the transition type and to describe the medication concerned by this error. Setting Five elderly nursing homes of the health care area in Ferrol (Spain) between January 2013 and December 2017 Method A prospective descriptive study on medication discrepancies found during pharmacist's medication reconciliation. This was performed at first admission and after every transition of care upon the patient's return to the nursing home. Interventions were categorized according to the consensus terminology. Main outcome measure Number and type of medication errors, percentage of transitions of care and percentage of patients who suffered at least one reconciliation error were measured. Results At least one medication error was found in 16% of the 2123 studied care transitions, summing up 417 reconciliation errors in 273/981 patients (28%). Wrong dosing (48%) and medication omissions (31%) were the most frequently detected errors. High-risk medication was involved in 40% of the cases. A positive association between polypharmacy (≥ 5 chronic medications) and the frequency of reconciliation errors was found. On the other hand, different transition types did not show a difference in error frequency. Conclusion Reconciliation errors were found in almost 30% of our patients. Unlike other studies, visits to outpatient specialist clinics were included as another type of healthcare transition, encompassing an important percentage of reconciliation errors. The pharmacist helped to reduce these errors in a particularly fragile population such as institutionalized patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are many interventions to facilitate seamless continuity of care for patients in transition from hospital back to primary care; however, disparities remain in readmission rates for vulnerable populations, especially African-Americans.Objectives: We set out to investigate the association of race and ethnicity with 30-day readmission in our urban academic setting and to identify factors that could be leveraged in primary care to address disparities in hospitalizations.Methods/approach: Using data originally collected for quality improvement purposes, we evaluated 30-day readmission rates for our primary care patients (January 1, 2013-September 30, 2014) by race and ethnicity, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. Then, using inductive and deductive methods, we coded semi-structured interviews with 24 African-American primary care patients who were discharged from the Medicine or Cardiology service at our tertiary care hospital during the study period.Key Results: African-Americans had the highest readmission rate (21.7%) and a higher adjusted odds of readmission (1.37; 95% CI 1.04-1.81) compared to Whites. Five major themes emerged as having potential to be leveraged in primary care to help prevent multiple hospitalizations: (1) dependable patient-physician relationships, (2) healthcare coordination across settings, (3) continuity with one primary care provider (PCP), (4) disease self-management, and (5) trust in resident physicians. Participants also made several recommendations to keep patients like themselves from returning to the hospital: increased time to tell their story during their primary care visit, more direct patient-physician communication during the visit, and improved access between visits.Conclusions: While African-American patients in our practice experience higher rates of hospital readmissions than their White counterparts, they emphasize the significance of their PCP relationship and communication to enhance disease management and prevent hospitalizations. Ongoing efforts are needed to establish and implement best practice communication trainings for patients at increased risk of hospitalization, particularly for resident physicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The National Quality Forum endorsed a 3-item Care Transitions Measure (CTM-3), part of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey, for evaluating hospital care transitions performance.Objective: To explore whether CTM-3 scores are a suitable proxy for quality of transitional care.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Participants: A random sample of 48,384 adults discharged from medical or surgical wards in all 113 acute care hospitals in Alberta, Canada, between April 2011 and March 2016.Main Measures: CTM-3 scores and their associations with all-cause emergency department (ED) visits or non-elective readmissions at 30 days, 3 months, and 12 months anywhere in the province.Results: CTM-3 scores were significantly lower (all p < 0.01) for females, older patients, those discharged from medical wards or teaching hospitals, and those with longer length of stay, higher Charlson scores, prior ED visits/hospitalizations, or who did not return to independent living after discharge. CTM-3 scores were not significantly associated with outcomes at 30 days (mean score 77.5 in those who subsequently had an ED visit/readmission vs. 77.9 in those who did not, p = 0.13, aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-0.99). Although CTM-3 scores were significantly lower in patients who subsequently had ED visit/readmission at 3 months (77.5 vs. 78.5) and 12 months (77.6 vs. 79.5), the magnitude of risk was small: for every 10 point decrease in the CTM-3 score, the risk of ED visit/readmission was 2.6% higher (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05) at 3 months and 4.0% higher (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08) at 12 months.Conclusions: The CTM-3 score is influenced by baseline patient and hospital factors, is not associated with 30-day post-discharge outcomes, and is only weakly associated with 3- and 12-month outcomes. These findings suggest that the CTM-3 score is not a good performance measure for the quality of transitional care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transitions of care has emerged as a point of vulnerability in global health care systems, which can lead to potential avoidable medical errors. In the United States, pharmacist-led transitions of care programs are increasing in number, with many hospitals offering discharge prescription services. However, the required training for these positions remains unclear. With the lack of accreditation standards by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists for transitions of care as a post-graduate year 2 specialty, this leads to the unanswered question: Which pharmacists are qualified for the growing number of transitions of care positions? Whether trained in a formal transitions of care specialty residency or not, pharmacists as a profession should reassess the proper qualifications needed to provide transitions of care services. One central message remains clear in that having a pharmacist on any interdisciplinary team who is knowledgeable about inpatient and community settings and administrative tasks involved in transitions of care while understanding optimal evidence-based recommendations would appear to be an important piece to the puzzle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There has been an increasing prevalence of individuals presenting for treatment of gender dysphoria over the past several years. This growing population includes transgender children referred to pediatric clinics. Transgender children meeting diagnostic criteria for gender dysphoria, with supportive mental health care, may be treated with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and cross sex hormones. The treatment for these children requires ongoing maintenance and monitoring and therefore follow-up in the adult care setting. As is the case with other conditions that require long term treatment, these youth need a formal transition from pediatric to adult clinical care. The period of transition of care is critical and if not executed properly exposes the adolescent to risks of complications, and loss of follow-up. The proper clinical transfer is especially important for transgender youth in the setting of increased psychosocial and mental health issues. The transition of care for transgender adolescents has not been formally studied but given a growing population seeking treatment for gender dysphoria, it will need to be systematically assessed to determine the best outcomes to measure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Heart failure is associated with an enormous burden on both patients and health care systems in the USA. Several national policy initiatives have focused on improving the quality of heart failure care, including reducing readmissions following hospitalization, which are common, costly, and, at least in part, preventable. The transition from inpatient to ambulatory care setting and the immediate post-hospitalization period present an opportunity to further optimize guideline concordant medical therapy, identify reversible issues related to worsening heart failure, and evaluate prognosis. It can also provide opportunities for medication reconciliation and optimization, consideration of device-based therapies, appropriate management of comorbidities, identification of individual barriers to care, and a discussion of goals of care based on prognosis.Recent Findings: Recent studies suggest that attention to detail regarding patient comorbidities, barriers to care, optimization of both diuretic and neurohormonal therapies, and assessment of prognosis improve patient outcomes. Despite the fact that the transition period appears to be an optimal time to address these issues in a comprehensive manner, most patients are not referred to programs specializing in this approach post hospital discharge.Summary: The objective of this review is to provide an outline for early post discharge care that allows clinicians and other health care providers to care for these heart failure patients in a manner that is both firmly rooted in the guidelines and patient-centered. Data regarding which intervention is most likely to confer benefit to which subset of patients with this disease is lacking and warrants further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background With the shifting role of community pharmacists towards patient education and counselling, they are well-positioned to conduct a post-discharge home visit which could prevent or solve drug-related problems. Gaining insight into the communication during these home visits could be valuable for optimizing and consequently improving patient safety at readmission to primary care. Objective To assess patient-pharmacist communication during a post-discharge home visit. Setting The homes of patients recently discharged from a single general hospital in the Netherlands. Methods Pharmacists used a semi-structured protocol to guide the consultations and audiorecorded them. Sixty audio-recordings were included for a qualitative analysis in this study with the help of NVivo version 11 software. Main outcome measure (1) Initiator and topics under discussion. (2) Frequency of discussion of topics as per coded in themes and subthemes. Results Issues regarding the administration and use of medication, e.g. regimen and actual drug-taking issues, knowledge gaps regarding their medication and patients' health were discussed most frequently, followed by medication logistics and medication effectiveness. Patients' beliefs about their medication and adherence were less frequently discussed. The pharmacist initiated the majority of these topics. Additional non-protocolled topics were scarce and consisted mainly of patient-initiated dissatisfaction regarding the community pharmacy or health insurers. Conclusion Community pharmacists most frequently initiated practical issues, but explored patients' medication beliefs less adequately. Discussing these beliefs might be easier by increasing patient engagement in the consultation and providing training programs for pharmacists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Of Review: The purpose of this review is to provide practical evidence-based recommendations for transitioning hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to home.Recent Findings: Hospitalized patients who have newly diagnosed or poorly controlled T2DM require initiation or intensification of their outpatient diabetes regimen. Potential barriers to medication access and continuity of care should be identified early in the hospitalization. Throughout hospitalization, patients should receive diabetes education focused on basic survival skills and tailored to learning needs. Patients should leave the hospital with personalized discharge instructions that include a list of all medications and follow-up appointments with both the outpatient diabetes provider and a diabetes educator whenever possible. An approach to transitioning patients with T2DM from hospital to home that focuses on optimizing the patient's discharge diabetes regimen, anticipating patients' needs during the immediate post-discharge period, providing survival skills education, and ensuring continuation of diabetes care and education following hospital discharge has the potential to improve glycemic control and reduce emergency department visits and hospital readmissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Medical residents are routinely entrusted with transitions of care, yet little is known about the duration or content of their perceived responsibility for patients they discharge from the hospital.Objective: To examine the duration and content of internal medicine residents' perceived responsibility for patients they discharge from the hospital. The secondary objective was to determine whether specific individual experiences and characteristics correlate with perceived responsibility.Design: Multi-site, cross-sectional 24-question survey delivered via email or paper-based form.Participants: Internal medicine residents (post-graduate years 1-3) at nine university and community-based internal medicine training programs in the United States.Main Measures: Perceived responsibility for patients after discharge as measured by a previously developed single-item tool for duration of responsibility and novel domain-specific questions assessing attitudes towards specific transition of care behaviors.Key Results: Of 817 residents surveyed, 469 responded (57.4 %). One quarter of residents (26.1 %) indicated that their responsibility for patients ended at discharge, while 19.3 % reported perceived responsibility extending beyond 2 weeks. Perceived duration of responsibility did not correlate with level of training (P = 0.57), program type (P = 0.28), career path (P = 0.12), or presence of burnout (P = 0.59). The majority of residents indicated they were responsible for six of eight transitional care tasks (85.1-99.3 % strongly agree or agree). Approximately half of residents (57 %) indicated that it was their responsibility to directly contact patients' primary care providers at discharge. and 21.6 % indicated that it was their responsibility to ensure that patients attended their follow-up appointments.Conclusions: Internal medicine residents demonstrate variability in perceived duration of responsibility for recently discharged patients. Neither the duration nor the content of residents' perceived responsibility was consistently associated with level of training, program type, career path, or burnout, suggesting there may be unmeasured factors such as professional role modeling that shape these perceptions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The adoption of electronic prescribing is on the rise, as it reduces medication errors compared to handwritten orders. The inadvertent dispensing of discontinued medications is a type of medication error that is less well described, but one that can lead to adverse events. Software for electronic prescriptions transmits orders for refills or new prescriptions, but not discontinuations, to the pharmacy. Medications that have been stopped are displayed only at the prescribing facility's electronic medical record (EMR). This report describes five cases in which the pharmacy dispensed electronically discontinued medications, two of which contributed to adverse outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) and Care Transitions Measure (CTM-3) scores are patient experience measures used to determine hospital value-based purchasing reimbursement. Interventions to improve 30-day readmissions have met with mixed results, but less is known about their potential to improve the patient experience among older ethnically and linguistically diverse adults receiving care at safety-net hospitals. In this study, we assessed the effect of a nurse-led hospital-based care transition intervention on discharge-related patient experience in an older multilingual population of adults hospitalized at a safety-net hospital.Methods: We randomized 700 inpatients aged 55 and older at an academic urban safety-net hospital. In addition to usual care, intervention participants received inpatient visits by a language-concordant study nurse and post-discharge phone calls from a language-concordant nurse practitioner to reinforce the care plan and to address acute complaints. We measured HCAHPS nursing, medication, and discharge communication domain scores and CTM-3 scores at 30 days after hospital discharge.Results: Of 685 participants who survived to 30 days, 90 % (n = 616) completed follow-up interviews. The mean age was 66.2 years; over half (54.2 %) of the participants had cognitive impairment, and 33.8 % had moderate to severe depression. The majority (62.1 %) of interviews were conducted in English; 23.3 % were conducted in Chinese and 14.6 % in Spanish. Study nurses spent an average of 157 min with intervention participants. Between intervention and usual care participants, CTM-3 scores (80.5 % vs 78.5 %; p = 0.18) and HCAHPS discharge communication domain scores (74.8 % vs 68.7 %; p = 0.11) did not differ, nor did HCAHPS scores in medication (44.5 % vs 53.1 %; p = 0.13) and nursing domains (67.9 % vs 64.9 %; p = 0.43). When stratified by language, no significant differences were seen.Conclusion: An inpatient standalone transition-of-care intervention did not improve patient discharge experience. Older multi-lingual and cognitively impaired populations may require higher-intensity interventions post-hospitalization to improve discharge experience outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hospital readmission is a high-priority health care quality measure and target for cost reduction. Despite broad interest in readmission, relatively little research has focused on patients with diabetes. The burden of diabetes among hospitalized patients, however, is substantial, growing, and costly, and readmissions contribute a significant portion of this burden. Reducing readmission rates of diabetic patients has the potential to greatly reduce health care costs while simultaneously improving care. Risk factors for readmission in this population include lower socioeconomic status, racial/ethnic minority, comorbidity burden, public insurance, emergent or urgent admission, and a history of recent prior hospitalization. Hospitalized patients with diabetes may be at higher risk of readmission than those without diabetes. Potential ways to reduce readmission risk are inpatient education, specialty care, better discharge instructions, coordination of care, and post-discharge support. More studies are needed to test the effect of these interventions on the readmission rates of patients with diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Few patient-centered interventions exist to improve year-end residency clinic handoffs. AIM: Our purpose was to assess the impact of a patient-centered transition packet and comic on clinic handoff outcomes. SETTING: The study was conducted at an academic medicine residency clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were patients undergoing resident clinic handoff 2011-2013 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Two months before the 2012 handoff, patients received a 'transition packet' incorporating patient-identified solutions (i.e., a new primary care provider (PCP) welcome letter with photo, certificate of recognition, and visit preparation tool). In 2013, a comic was incorporated to stress the importance of follow-up. PROGRAM EVALUATION: Patients were interviewed by phone with response rates of 32 % in 2011, 43 % in 2012 and 36 % in 2013. Most patients who were interviewed were aware of the handoff post-packet (95 %). With the comic, more patients recalled receiving the packet (44 % 2012 vs. 64 % 2013, p< 0.001) and correctly identified their new PCP (77 % 2012 vs. 98 % 2013, p< 0.001). Among patients recalling the packet, most (70 % 2012; 65 % 2013) agreed it helped them establish rapport. Both years, fewer patients missed their first new PCP visit (43 % in 2011, 31 % in 2012 and 26 % in 2013, p< 0.001). DISCUSSION: A patient-centered transition packet helped prepare patients for clinic handoffs. The comic was associated with increased packet recall and improved follow-up rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: End-of-residency transitions create disruptions in primary care continuity. The national implementation of Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care clinics creates an opportunity to mitigate this discontinuity through the provision of team-based care. OBJECTIVES: To identify team-based solutions to end-of-residency transitions in a resident PACT continuity clinic by assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of non-physician PACT members and resident PACT physicians. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional survey of 27 resident physicians and 24 non-physician PACT members in the Internal Medicine Clinic at the Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital in the South Texas Veterans Health Care System. RESULTS: Twenty-seven residents and 24 non-physician PACT members completed the survey, with response rates of 90 % and 100 %, respectively. All residents and 96 % of non-physician PACT members agreed or strongly agreed that the residents were responsible for informing patients about end-of-residency transitions. Only 38 % of non-physician PACT members versus 52 % of residents indicated that non-physician PACT members should be responsible for this transition. Approximately 80 % of resident physicians and non-physician PACT members agreed there should be a formalized approach to these transitions; 67 % of non-physician PACT members were willing to support this transition. Potential barriers to team-based care transitions were identified. Major themes of write-in suggestions for improving the transition focused on communication and relationships between the patient and PACT and among the PACT members. CONCLUSIONS: PACT implementation changes the roles and relationship structures among all team members. While end-of-residency transitions create a disruption in the relationship system, the remainder of the PACT may bridge this transition. Our results demonstrate the importance of a team-based solution that engages all PACT members by improving communication and fostering effective team relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Medication discrepancies may occur at transitions in care and negatively impact patient outcomes. Objective To determine if involving clinical pharmacists in hospital care, medication reconciliation and discharge medication plan communication can reduce medication discrepancies with a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled trial. Setting A large, tertiary care, academic medical center. Method The intervention consisted of clinical pharmacist medication reconciliation, patient education and improved communication of the discharge medication plan, as devised by the hospital physician and care team, to primary care physicians and community pharmacists. Medication discrepancies were identified by blinded research pharmacists who reviewed primary care physician and pharmacy records at discharge through 90 days post-discharge to create 30- and 90-day medication lists. Main outcome measure Rate of medication discrepancies compared across groups. Results A total of 592 subjects from internal medicine, family medicine, cardiology and orthopedic services were evaluated for this study. Clinically important medication discrepancies in the primary care physician record were different between groups 30 days after hospital discharge following a clinical pharmacist's intervention. The mean number of medication discrepancies per patient for the enhanced group being nearly half the number in the control group. However, this effect did not persist to 90 days post-discharge and did not extend to community pharmacy records. Conclusion The present study demonstrates the involvement of pharmacists in hospital care, medication reconciliation and discharge medication plan communication may affect the quality of the outpatient medical record. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Although Internal Medicine year-end resident clinic handoffs affect numerous patients, little research has described patients' perspectives of the experience. OBJECTIVE: To describe patients' perceptions of positive and negative experiences pertaining to the year-end clinic handoff; to rate patient satisfaction with aspects of the clinic handoff and identify whether or not patients could name their new physicians. DESIGN: Qualitative study design using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: High-risk patients who underwent a year-end clinic handoff in July 2011. MEASUREMENTS: Three months post-handoff, telephone interviews were conducted with patients to elicit their perceptions of positive and negative experiences. An initial coding classification was developed and applied to transcripts. Patients were also asked to name their primary care physician (PCP) and rate their satisfaction with the handoff. RESULTS: In all, 103 telephone interviews were completed. Patient experiences regarding clinic handoffs were categorized into four themes: (1) doctor-patient relationships (i.e. difficulty building rapport); (2) clinic logistics (i.e. difficulty rescheduling appointments); (3) process of the care transition (i.e. patient unaware transition occurred); and (4) patient safety-related issues (i.e. missed tests). Only 59 % of patients could correctly name their new PCP. Patients who reported that they were informed of the clinic transition by letter or by telephone call from their new PCP were more likely to correctly name them (65 % vs. 32 % p = 0.007), report that their new doctor assumed care for them immediately (81 % [68/84] vs. 53 % [10/19], p = 0.009) and report satisfaction with communication between their old and new doctors (80 % [67/84] vs. 58 % [11/19], p = 0.04). Patients reported positive experiences such as learning more about their new physician through personal sharing, which helped them build rapport. Patients who reported being aware of the medical education mission of the clinic tended to be more understanding of the handoff process. CONCLUSIONS: Patients face unique challenges during year-end clinic handoffs and provide insights into areas of improvement for a patient-centered handoff. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Many patients nationwide change their primary care physician (PCP) when internal medicine (IM) residents graduate. Few studies have examined this handoff. OBJECTIVE: To assess patient outcomes and resident perspectives after the year-end continuity clinic handoff DESIGN: Retrospective cohort PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent a year-end clinic handoff in July 2010 and a comparison group of all other resident clinic patients from 2009-2011. PGY2 IM residents surveyed from 2010-2011. MEASUREMENTS: Percent of high-risk patients after the clinic handoff scheduled for an appointment, who saw their assigned PCP, lost to follow-up, or had an acute visit (ED or hospitalization). Perceptions of PGY2 IM residents surveyed after receiving a clinic handoff. RESULTS: Thirty graduating residents identified 258 high-risk patients. While nearly all patients (97 %) were scheduled, 29 % missed or cancelled their first new PCP visit. Only 44 % of patients saw the correct PCP and six months later, one-fifth were lost to follow-up. Patients not seen by a new PCP after the handoff were less likely to have appropriate follow-up for pending tests (0 % vs. 63 %, P < 0.001). A higher mean no show rate (NSR) was observed among patients who missed their first new PCP visit (22 % vs. 16 % NSR, p < 0.001) and those lost to follow-up (21 % vs. 17 % NSR, p = 0.019). While 47 % of residents worried about missing important data during the handoff, 47 % reported that they do not perceive patients as 'theirs' until they are seen by them in clinic. CONCLUSIONS: While most patients were scheduled for appointments after a clinic handoff, many did not see the correct resident and one-fifth were lost to follow-up. Patients who miss appointments are especially at risk of poor clinic handoff outcomes. Future efforts should improve patient attendance to their first new PCP visit and increase PCP ownership. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Failure to follow up microbiology results pending at the time of hospital discharge can delay diagnosis and treatment of important infections, harm patients, and increase the risk of litigation. Current systems to track pending tests are often inadequate. OBJECTIVE: To design, implement, and evaluate an automated system to improve follow-up of microbiology results that return after hospitalized patients are discharged. DESIGN: Cluster randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS: Inpatient and outpatient physicians caring for adult patients hospitalized at a large academic hospital from February 2009 to June 2010 with positive and untreated or undertreated blood, urine, sputum, or cerebral spinal fluid cultures returning post-discharge. INTERVENTION: An automated e-mail-based system alerting inpatient and outpatient physicians to positive post-discharge culture results not adequately treated with an antibiotic at the time of discharge. MAIN MEASURES: Our primary outcome was documented follow-up of results within 3 days. Secondary outcomes included physician awareness and assessment of result urgency, impact on clinical assessments and plans, and preferred alerting scenarios. KEY RESULTS: We evaluated the follow-up of 157 post-discharge microbiology results from patients of 121 physicians. We found documented follow-up in 27/97 (28%) results in the intervention group and 8/60 (13%) in the control group [aOR 3.2, (95% CI 1.3-8.4); p = 0.01]. Of all inpatient physician respondents, 32/82 (39%) were previously aware of the results, 45/77 (58%) felt the results changed their assessments and plans, 43/77 (56%) felt the results required urgent action, and 67/70 (96%) preferred alerts for current or broader scenarios. CONCLUSION: Our alerting system improved the proportion of important post-discharge microbiology results with documented follow-up, though the proportion remained low. The alerts were well received and may be expanded in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It is well documented that transitions of care pose a risk to patient safety. Every year, graduating residents transfer their patient panels to incoming interns, yet in our practice we consistently find that approximately 50% of patients do not return for follow-up care within a year of their resident leaving.Objective: To examine the implications of this lapse of care with respect to chronic disease management, follow-up of abnormal test results, and adherence with routine health care maintenance.Design: Retrospective chart reviewSubjects: We studied a subset of patients cared for by 46 senior internal medicine residents who graduated in the spring of 2008. 300 patients had been identified as high priority requiring follow-up within a year. We examined the records of the 130 of these patients who did not return for care.Main Measures: We tabulated unaddressed abnormal test results, missed health care screening opportunities and unmonitored chronic medical conditions. We also attempted to call these patients to identify barriers to follow-up.Key Results: These patients had a total of 185 chronic medical conditions. They missed a total of 106 screening opportunities including mammogram (24), Pap smear (60) and colon cancer screening (22). Thirty-two abnormal pathology, imaging and laboratory test results were not followed-up as the graduating senior intended. Among a small sample of patients who were reached by phone, barriers to follow-up included a lack of knowledge about the need to see a physician, distance between home and our office, difficulties with insurance, and transportation.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the high-risk nature of patient handoffs in the ambulatory setting when residents graduate. We discuss changes that might improve the panel transfer process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Failure to reconcile medications across transitions in care is an important source of harm to patients. Little is known about medication discrepancies upon admission to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs).Objective: To describe the prevalence of, type of medications involved in, and sources of medication discrepancies upon admission to the SNF setting.Design: Cross-sectional study.Participants: Patients admitted to SNF for subacute care.Measurements: Number of medication discrepancies, defined as unexplained differences among documented medication regimens, including the hospital discharge summary, patient care referral form and SNF admission orders.Results: Of 2,319 medications reviewed on admission, 495 (21.3%) had a medication discrepancy. At least one medication discrepancy was identified in 142 of 199 (71.4%) SNF admissions. The discharge summary and the patient care referral form did not match in 104 of 199 (52.3%) SNF admissions. Disagreement between the discharge summary and the patient care referral form accounted for 62.0% (n = 307) of all medication discrepancies. Cardiovascular agents, opioid analgesics, neuropsychiatric agents, hypoglycemics, antibiotics, and anticoagulants accounted for over 50% of all discrepant medications.Conclusions: Medication discrepancies occurred in almost three out of four SNF admissions and accounted for one in five medications prescribed on admission. The discharge summary and the patient care referral forms from the discharging institution are often in disagreement. Our study findings underscore the importance of current efforts to improve the quality of inter-institutional communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patient care transitions have been shown to be critical points at which failure as well as recovery from potential failure may occur. The purpose of this research was to identify transitions in patient care and the flow of associated information at different steps in the outpatient surgery preoperative care process and, in turn, attempt to identify breakdowns in the information flow process and their ramifications. A study of one organization’s preoperative process for outpatient surgery was conducted, employing four means of data collection to gather information on preoperative work processes: employee shadowing, patient shadowing, clinic observation, and dictated feedback. Various facilitators and obstacles in information flow were found to be present in the preoperative care process. Obstacles often resulted in negative consequences for healthcare providers and patients. Helping care providers understand how their actions affect the various elements of the preoperative process, through improved awareness, may be one way to improve information flow problems within the outpatient surgery process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article describes a study which examined the integration of a pharmacist in the out patient setting, following a patient's discharge to home. Topics include the percentage of patients who experience adverse event during the transition from hospital to home, ways to minimize the risk of medication errors, and the role of pharmacy technicians in conducting comprehensive medication history taking.