Search

Objective: Bakers are at high risk of rhinitis and asthma, but the prevalence of these occupational diseases is not well known in Sub-Saharan Africa. We investigated the prevalence of occupational rhinitis and asthma among industrial bakers in the former province of Katanga. Methods: In a cross-sectional study conducted in eight towns from October 2018 to September 2019, we included 276 male workers from 18 industrial bakeries and 113 male controls (35 butchers and 78 bread sellers), all nonsmokers. Participants replied to a validated questionnaire (European Community of Respiratory Health Survey II), administered face to face, and performed spirometry at the work place. In 15 bakers with symptoms of work-related asthma, records of self-measured peak expiratory flow (PEF) 4 times per day during 4 weeks were analyzed by the OASYS (Occupational Asthma System) protocol. Results: The bakers and controls did not differ by age (32.2 ± 7.3 y vs 32.8 ± 10.3 y). According to the questionnaire, work-related rhinitis and asthma were significantly more prevalent among bakers (31% and 5%, respectively) than among controls (2% and 0%, respectively). However, the groups did not differ significantly with regard to spirometric parameters. Based on PEF records, 10 out of 15 were positive for occupational asthma (OASYS score > 2.5), so the rate of occupational asthma was 3.6% in this study. Conclusion: This first study in DR Congo demonstrates the existence of occupational rhinitis and asthma among industrial bakers in Katanga. Further epidemiological studies are needed to clarify the extent and risk factors of baker's asthma in the area. In the meantime, advocacy and implementation of appropriate occupational hygiene measures are warranted to protect bakery workers in DR Congo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Bilastine is a second-generation H1 antihistamine indicated for the symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria. On the basis of the demonstrated efficacy and safety of the oral formulation, a new ophthalmic formulation of bilastine was recently developed. Previous preclinical studies had indicated that bilastine is mainly absorbed by the conjunctiva and shows low plasma concentration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of ophthalmic bilastine (6 mg/mL) after single and multiple dose administration at steady state in healthy adults. Methods: This was an open-label, single-centre, phase I, bioavailability clinical trial. One drop of the bilastine ophthalmic formulation was administered once daily in each eye of the subjects for 5 days. Bilastine plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC–MS/MS. Adverse drug reactions were recorded for each subject during drug administration and follow-up visits. Results: Twelve healthy subjects (age 18–55 years) were included in the study. After multiple dose administration, bilastine reached a mean (± SD) maximum blood concentrations of 2682.26 ± 1615.88 pg/mL at a median time of 2.50 h (range 1.25–4.00 h). The half-life of bilastine in plasma was 7.88 ± 6.72 h. Steady state AUC was 19,512.51 ± 9248.76 h·pg/mL. Adverse events were mild and transient, consisting mainly of dysgeusia. Conclusions: Bilastine once-daily ophthalmic formulation 6 mg/mL is absorbed into the bloodstream in low amounts by the ophthalmic route. The bilastine ophthalmic formulation showed a good safety profile after multiple dose administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: To assess the effects of herbal medicine (HM) therapy in various durations and analyze the effects of HM separately by mechanism of action in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Recent Findings: Thirty-two studies were included (2,697 patients, mean age 34.6 years). For the ≤ 4 weeks of treatment duration, HM brought greater benefits over placebo in reduction of total nasal symptoms score (standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.98, −0.38; p <0.01) and improvement in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire score (SMD −0.53; 95% CI −0.81, −0.25; p <0.01). For the 4–12 weeks duration, total nasal symptoms score (SMD −0.22; 95%CI −0.4, −0.05; p =0.01) and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire score (SMD −0.48; 95% CI −0.89, −0.06; p =0.03) favored the HM. However, HM therapy for longer than 12 weeks was related to tachyphylaxis and showed no benefit over placebo in any outcomes. There was no difference between the HM and standard treatment on symptoms improvement. Anti-allergic effect, anti-inflammatory effect, anti-leukotriene effect, and anti-histaminic effect of HM were revealed. HM was safe and their adverse effects were comparable placebo. Summary: HM therapy is safe and provides better results than placebo in improving nasal symptoms and disease-specific quality of life in patients with AR. Its beneficial effects are demonstrated only in less than 12 weeks of treatment. Trial Registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42020168367 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with birch pollen extract has been shown to be an efficacious treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). An as-yet unanswered question is whether and how clinical benefit translates into patient benefit, i.e. what benefit patients derive from this treatment.Methods: This 1-year, open, prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study conducted in 75 German centers measured patient-relevant benefit of birch pollen SLIT (Staloral® Birch) using the questionnaire "Patient Benefit Index for Allergic Rhinitis (PBI-AR)". At treatment onset, patients rated the importance of 25 treatment needs; after the first birch pollen season on treatment, goal achievement was evaluated. A preference-weighted benefit index was calculated and its association with gender, asthma, allergy status, and severity of AR symptoms was determined.Results: Mean age of the 291 adult patients was 38.8 years; 58.4% were female. The most important treatment goals were to "be able to stay outdoors without symptoms" (87.3% quite or very important), "no longer have a runny or stuffed-up nose" (86.9%), and "be able to breathe through your nose more freely" (86.9%). The treatment goals with the highest benefit ratings (referring to those patients to whom the respective goal applied) were to "have confidence in the therapy" (60.5% has helped "quite" or "very much"), "have an easily applicable treatment" (55.6%), and "be able to breathe through my nose more freely" (51.7%). The average PBI-AR global score was 2.19 (SD 1.04) (0-4; with 4 indicating maximum benefit). No significant differences in PBI-AR global score or subscales were found between men and women, poly- and monoallergic patients, or patients with severe versus mild rhinoconjunctivitis. Patients with asthma reported relevant but lower benefit than patients without asthma.Conclusion: After 1 year of birch pollen SLIT treatment, patients reported considerable benefit, mainly due to a reduction of physical symptoms and treatment burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Whether exposure to outdoor air pollution increases the prevalence of rhinoconjunctivitis in children is unclear. Using data from Phase Three of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in childhood (ISAAC), we investigated associations of rhinoconjunctivitis prevalence in adolescents with model-based estimates of ozone, and satellite-based estimates of fine (diameter < 2.5 μm) particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Information on rhinoconjunctivitis (defined as self-reported nose symptoms without a cold or flu accompanied by itchy watery eyes in the past 12 months) was available on 505,400 children aged 13-14 years, in 183 centres in 83 countries. Centre-level prevalence estimates were calculated and linked geographically with estimates of long-term average concentrations of NO2, ozone and PM2.5. Multi-level models were fitted adjusting for population density, climate, sex and gross national income. Information on parental smoking, truck traffic and cooking fuel was available for a restricted set of centres (77 in 36 countries). Between centres within countries, the estimated change in rhinoconjunctivitis prevalence per 100 children was 0.171 (95% confidence interval: − 0.013, 0.354) per 10% increase in PM2.5, 0.096 (− 0.003, 0.195) per 10% increase in NO2 and − 0.186 (− 0.390, 0.018) per 1 ppbV increase in ozone. Between countries, rhinoconjunctivitis prevalence was significantly negatively associated with both ozone and PM2.5. In the restricted dataset, the latter association became less negative following adjustment for parental smoking and open fires for cooking. In conclusion, there were no significant within-country associations of rhinoconjunctivitis prevalence with study pollutants. Negative between-country associations with PM2.5 and ozone require further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Intra-seasonal start of treatment with the SQ® grass sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablet (GRAZAX®, ALK, Denmark) has been previously demonstrated to be well-tolerated. The objective of our study was to investigate the tolerability of intra-seasonal start of treatment comparing patients treated by allergists and general practitioners experienced in treatment of allergy (GPs).Methods: In a non-interventional, open-label, observational study, data on intra-seasonal start with the SQ® grass SLIT tablet were recorded in patients treated by allergists and GPs in Germany. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded by the physicians at first administration and during the 1-3-month observation period. The tablets taken and any AEs were recorded by the patients in diaries for the first 14 days.Results: Treatment with the SQ® grass SLIT tablet was started in 198 patients, and in 179 intra-seasonal (allergists: 140, GPs: 39) and 19 post-seasonal; average treatment period was 47 days. AEs related to intra-seasonal start were reported in 43.6% of patients; no relevant differences between allergists and GPs were observed. In the subgroup of GPs, patients were younger (p = 0.0191), had more frequently asthma (p = 0.0043), more patients used symptomatic medication in the previous pollen season (p = 0.0198) and were more frequently treated for other diseases (p = 0.0467). In the allergists subgroup, more diagnostic allergy tests were applied (p < 0.0001) with less anti-allergic premedication at first administration (p = 0.0026).Conclusion: The intra-seasonal start of treatment with the SQ® grass SLIT tablet in patients routinely treated by allergists or GPs with experience in treatment of allergy was well-tolerated, although patient characteristics were different with respect to age, frequency of asthma and concomitant allergies, use of symptomatic medication in the previous grass pollen season and concomitant treatment of other diseases. The safety profile from a previous placebo-controlled clinical trial and data from a previous real-life study on intra-seasonal start performed by allergists were confirmed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Ophthalmologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Churg–Strauss syndrome (CSS) is a serious but rare pauci-immune vasculitis of small- and medium-sized blood vessels. It is commonly seen in association with bronchial asthma and/or allergic disorders. The syndrome is characterized by the presence of asthma, hypereosinophilia, and vasculitis in any part of the body. Vasculitis is often associated with significant distortion of normal functions. A rather severe case of CSS in an 8-year-old Nigerian girl with asthma and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is reported. She presented with multiple morbidities, namely, vasculitic polyneuropathy and also nephritic–nephrotic syndrome that eventuated in acute renal failure after an onset of vasculitic gastroenteritis. Routine screening of all asthmatic patients for CSS is advocated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this 8-week open-label, prospective study, 30 patients with grass pollen allergy and ocular itching instilled nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution twice daily for a 5-day baseline period, followed by once-daily dosing thereafter. Physicians assessed clinical signs after the twice-daily period and after weeks 1 and 3 of the once-daily period; patients rated ocular symptoms daily. Use of specified rescue medication was permitted. Symptom scores for ocular itching, stinging, redness, swelling, burning, tearing, and light sensitivity did not differ significantly between the dosage periods. Scores for erythema, edema, conjunctival injection, and the entire conjunctiva decreased slightly during once-daily administration; discharge scores were unchanged. Of the 20 patients who used rescue medication, only 5 increased their usage by more than two doses per week during the once-daily period. Eighty-three percent of patients were willing to continue the once-daily regimen during the next allergy season. Physicians rated overall control of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis with once-daily administration as "good" or "moderate" in 100% of the patients; 93% of patients applied those ratings themselves. Nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution instilled once daily maintains control of symptoms in patients who are established on a twice-daily regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution for the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis, 24 golfers with documented ragweed-pollen allergy instilled eyedrops twice daily for 4 days prior to golf-course intervention and 15 minutes before playing a round of golf during peak ragweed season. Ocular symptoms were scored at baseline (7 days before golfing), prior to instillation on the day of golf, and 30 minutes, and 1, 4, 8, and 12 hours after tee-off. Physician assessment was performed prior to tee-off, before tee-off on the ninth hole, and at the end of the 18th hole. Itching, burning, grittiness, tearing, redness, and light sensitivity were significantly decreased after nedocromil administration, as were erythema, edema, conjunctival hyperemia, and overall findings in the conjunctiva. Symptom severity scores fell approximately 30 minutes after instillation, with improvements persisting 8 and 12 hours after treatment. Most patients (92%) rated the treatment moderately or completely effective, and 83% were willing to continue its use. Physician assessments of effectiveness agreed with those of the patients. In this open-label study, nedocromil sodium eyedrops relieved the ocular symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis for up to 12 hours, well beyond a usual round of golf. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]