Search

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed the understanding of the safety profile of therapies for immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). This is primarily due to the negative impact of a number of basic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and genetically engineered biological drugs (biological DMARDs, or biologics) on the course and outcomes of a new coronavirus infection. A number of studies have shown that anti-B-cell therapy (rituximab) gave a statistically significant increase in the risk of severe COVID-19 and an increase in mortality. At the same time, the analysis of real clinical practice data dictated the need to establish a number of restrictions on the use of certain classes of biologics and to search for alternative therapy programs to maintain control over disease activity. Purpose of the study. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug Artlegia® (olokizumab), solution for subcutaneous injection, 160 mg/ml-0.4 ml, manufactured by R-Pharm JSC, Russia) for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real clinical practice after switching with rituximab during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods. The study included 14 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who were previously on rituximab therapy at a dose of 1000–500 mg twice with an interval of 2 weeks, who received at least one course of therapy with this drug. As RA worsened, patients were switched to olokizumab against the background of standard DMARDs. On weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 after the switch, the severity of pain was assessed on the VAS scale, the number of tender and swollen joints (TJC28 and SJC28), the level of acute-phase inflammation markers, the DAS28 (disease activity score), ESR, CRP, CDAI (clinical activity index), and the functional state index HAQ (Health Assessment Questionnaire) were determined, as well as the safety profile of therapy was assessed. Results. Data analysis was performed using median values (Me) were used for data analysis. A significant decrease in TJC28 was detected after 8 and 12 weeks of treatment with olokizumab (Artlegia®) (Me baseline = 10, Me 8 weeks = 4, Me 12 weeks = 4, p < 0.05) and a decrease in TSC28 was detected after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment (Me baseline = 9, Me 4 weeks = 3.5, Me 8 weeks = 2.5, Me 12 weeks = 2.0, p < 0.05). Laboratory markers of inflammation showed a decrease in CRP and ESR levels after 4 weeks of treatment (CRP: Me4 weeks = 21, Me4 weeks = 1, p < 0.05, ESR: Mesno = 31, Me4 weeks = 7, p < 0.05). Positive dynamics persisted on 8 and 12 weeks (CRP: Me 8 weeks = 1, Me 12 weeks = 0; ESR: Me 8 weeks = 4, Me 12 weeks = 5). The level of CRP by week 4 became within the normal range, regardless of the initial values. All activity indices improved from week 4 in each evaluation period compared to baseline: DAS28-ESR: Me baseline = 5.52, Me 4 weeks = 3.59, Me 8 weeks = 3.33, Me 12 weeks = 3.22, p < 0.05; DAS28CRP: Me baseline = 5.39, Me 4 weeks = 3.71, Me 8 weeks = 3.35, Me 12 weeks = 3.45, p < 0.05; CDAI: Me baseline = 28.5, Me 4 weeks = 18.0, Me 8 weeks = 16.5, Me 12 weeks = 16.0, p < 0.05. All patients showed a reduction in pain (VAS scale) by week 8. The functional status of patients, according to the HAQ index, showed a significant decrease only by week 12 of the study: Me baseline = 1.62, Me 12 weeks = 1.31, p < 0.05. Conclusions. The study found that switching from rituximab to olokizumab was effective and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interleukin (IL) 6 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of depression comorbid with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and IL-6 inhibitors used to treat patients with RA may have an antidepressant effect. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Russian iIL-6 olokizumab (OKZ) in reducing symptoms of depression in patients with moderate/high RA activity. To date, 49 RA patients have been included, of which 43 (87.7%) are women, with an average age of 47.8 ± 12.8 years; with a predominant high activity of RA according to DAS28 (CRP) indices (89.8%), SDAI (79.6%) and CDAI (75.5%) and inefficacy of stable 12-week therapy with сDMARDs. In all patients, a psychiatrist, in accordance with ICD-10, diagnosed depression (chronic or recurrent) of varying severity during a semi-structured interview. At week 0, all patients were randomized by the method of sequential numbers in a ratio of 1 : 1 : 1 to one of the three study groups: group 1—cDMARDs + OKZ 64 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks (n = 18); group 2—cDMARDs + OKZ 64 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks + psychopharmacotherapy (PPT) (n = 26); group 3—cDMARDs + PPT (n = 5). The duration of the study is 24 weeks. The dynamics of depression severity was assessed on the PHQ-9, MADRS scales; anxiety, on HAM-A; experimental psychological projective techniques were also used. After 12 and 24 weeks of therapy, there was a significant decrease in the severity of depression and anxiety in all groups of patients. However, the difference between the final and initial values of all scales was statistically significantly greater (p <0.05) in the groups of patients receiving PPT: cDMARDs + OKZ + PPT (ΔPHQ-9 24–0 = –6.75 ± 3.91; ΔMADRS 24–0 = –22.5 ± 4.83; ΔHAM-A 24-0 = –14.6 ± 5.37) and cDMARDs + PPT (ΔPHQ-9 24–0 = –15.5 ± 3.53; ΔMADRS 24–0 = –25.0 ± 1.41; ΔHAM-A 24-0 = –18.5 ± 3.53), compared with the cDMARDs + OKZ group (ΔPHQ-9 24–0 = –4.00 ± 3.89; ΔMADRS 24-0 = –5.75 ± 8.29; ΔHAM-A 24–0 = –8.50 ± 8.21). According to a semi-structured interview with a psychiatrist and design experimental psychological techniques, the proportion of patients without depression after 24 weeks of therapy was significantly higher in the groups of patients receiving PPT: 90% in the group of cDMARDs + OKZ + PPT and 100%—cDMARDs + PPT, as opposed to 25% in the group of cDMARDs + OKZ. OKZ therapy contributed to the normalization of night sleep but did not lead to a decrease in the frequency and severity of cognitive disorders (CDs). OKZ has an antidepressant effect, leads to a decrease in the frequency of sleep disorders. However, a complete regression of depression symptoms when OKZ is prescribed without PPT is possible only in 25% of RA patients, mainly in the patients with mild depression. A combination of OKZ and PPT is optimal for the complete regression of depression and anxiety and a decrease in the frequency and severity of CDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Olokizumab (OKZ) is a novel IL-6 inhibitor that directly targets IL-6 rather than its receptor. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OKZ for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to investigate the optimal treatment regimen. A systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from WOS, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and PubMed until August 31, 2022. We used the risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively, presented with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We registered our protocol in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022358082. Five RCTs with 2277 patients were included. OKZ significantly improved the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR) 20 (RR: 1.97 with 95% CI [1.49, 2.58], P = 0.00001), ACR50 (RR: 3.83 with 95% CI [2.13, 6.87], P = 0.00001), ACR70 (RR: 3.83 with 95% CI [2.13, 6.87], P = 0.00001), disease activity score 28 based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) (RR: 3.91 with 95% CI [2.65, 5.79], P = 0.00001), clinical disease activity index (CDAI) (RR: 2.80 with 95% CI [1.43, 5.48], P = 0.003), and health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) (MD: − 0.28 with 95% CI [− 0.38, − 0.18], P = 0.00001) after 12 weeks, compared to placebo. However, OKZ was also associated with a higher incidence of any adverse events (AEs) (RR: 1.15 with 95% CI [1.06, 1.25], P = 0.0005) and AEs leading to drug discontinuation (RR: 1.86 with 95% CI [1.05, 3.29], P = 0.03). OKZ is effective and with acceptable safety profile when administrated with methotrexate in patients with RA not adequately controlled by tumor necrosis factor inhibitors; however, more large-scale RCTs are still required to investigate the optimal dosing, long-term effects, and comparative efficacy versus established biological DMARDs. Key Points • OKZ is effective especially with methotrexate in RA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]