Search

Background: Dentigerous cysts are the second most common form of a developmental cyst. These cysts might be the cause of ectopic teeth. Dentigerous cysts associated with ectopic teeth in the maxillary sinus are seldom seen in clinical practice. Case presentation: We reported a 23-year-old woman who presented with nasal obstruction and facial pain on the left side 4 months ago. Three courses of antibiotics and analgesia were prescribed for her without improving the presenting features. Furthermore, extraction of the left upper second premolar and second molar, but the condition persisted. An orthopantogram and computerized tomography scan revealed the ectopic position of the left third upper molar tooth, which was embedded in a cystic lesion occupying the whole maxillary sinus. Removal of the cystic lesion with the ectopic tooth was performed with a Caldwell-Luc procedure. The histopathological evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of a dentigerous cyst. The presenting symptoms were resolved following surgery with no intra- or postoperative complications. Conclusion: We are reporting another case of a dentigerous cyst occupying the whole left maxillary sinus with an ectopic left third upper molar tooth. Reporting such a case will enrich the literature regarding this rare clinical entity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ectopic tooth in maxillary sinus is a rare entity. There are many causes of this condition include developmental disturbance, pathological process, iatrogenic, and in some cases there is no identified cause. The ectopic tooth could be asymptomatic or presented with various symptoms depends on its location. A 19-years-old woman presented with left-sided facial pain and slight swelling at the site of the upper 3rd molar tooth for three months. She gave a history of mid-facial trauma with an operation in this area, 11 years ago. Orthopantography and computerized tomography confirm the diagnosis of ectopic tooth within the maxillary sinus. The tooth was removed by Caldwell-Luc procedure. The patient was remained free of the presenting symptoms at three months follow-up. Reporting any case of an ectopic tooth deserves the ability to know the various aspects of this condition. We reported a further case of ectopic 3rd molar tooth in the left maxillary sinus, most probably, due to previous mid-facial trauma or the surgery in this area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To identify the preferred surgical approach (intra- or extra-oral) to remove an ectopic third mandibular molar (ETMM) according on its location and presence of an associated cyst or cutaneous fistula, and to determine the indications for a graft or osteosynthesis.A surgical practice questionnaire was distributed to oral and maxillo-facial surgeons attending a National Congress of the French Society of Stomatology, Maxillo-facial and Oral Surgery. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was carried on Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and ScienceDirect databases using the MeSH terms: “Ectopic teeth”, “Third molar”, “Mandibular”. One hundred and forty-three surgeons answered the questionnaire and the meta-analysis included 66 articles.From the questionnaire, the preferred surgical approach was intra-oral except when the ETMM was in the condyle, when it was extra-oral (69.5%; p < 0.001). In the meta-analysis, an extra-oral approach was only indicated when a cutaneous fistula was present (90% vs. 35.9%; p = 0.002), irrespective of ETMM location. In the questionnaire and meta-analysis, the presence of a cyst did not change the approach (p < 0.05). The indications for a graft or osteosynthesis were a condylar location (p < 0.001), while a cutaneous fistula decreased the indication (p = 0.04) and a cyst (p = 0.009) was only associated with a graft.The preferential approach was intra-oral, except when the ETMM was condylar or a cutaneous fistula was present when an extra-oral approach was preferred. Osteosynthesis or a graft were more likely when the ETMM was in the condyle.This study will help to orientate surgeons vis-à-vis ETMM treatment.Materials and methods: To identify the preferred surgical approach (intra- or extra-oral) to remove an ectopic third mandibular molar (ETMM) according on its location and presence of an associated cyst or cutaneous fistula, and to determine the indications for a graft or osteosynthesis.A surgical practice questionnaire was distributed to oral and maxillo-facial surgeons attending a National Congress of the French Society of Stomatology, Maxillo-facial and Oral Surgery. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was carried on Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and ScienceDirect databases using the MeSH terms: “Ectopic teeth”, “Third molar”, “Mandibular”. One hundred and forty-three surgeons answered the questionnaire and the meta-analysis included 66 articles.From the questionnaire, the preferred surgical approach was intra-oral except when the ETMM was in the condyle, when it was extra-oral (69.5%; p < 0.001). In the meta-analysis, an extra-oral approach was only indicated when a cutaneous fistula was present (90% vs. 35.9%; p = 0.002), irrespective of ETMM location. In the questionnaire and meta-analysis, the presence of a cyst did not change the approach (p < 0.05). The indications for a graft or osteosynthesis were a condylar location (p < 0.001), while a cutaneous fistula decreased the indication (p = 0.04) and a cyst (p = 0.009) was only associated with a graft.The preferential approach was intra-oral, except when the ETMM was condylar or a cutaneous fistula was present when an extra-oral approach was preferred. Osteosynthesis or a graft were more likely when the ETMM was in the condyle.This study will help to orientate surgeons vis-à-vis ETMM treatment.Results: To identify the preferred surgical approach (intra- or extra-oral) to remove an ectopic third mandibular molar (ETMM) according on its location and presence of an associated cyst or cutaneous fistula, and to determine the indications for a graft or osteosynthesis.A surgical practice questionnaire was distributed to oral and maxillo-facial surgeons attending a National Congress of the French Society of Stomatology, Maxillo-facial and Oral Surgery. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was carried on Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and ScienceDirect databases using the MeSH terms: “Ectopic teeth”, “Third molar”, “Mandibular”. One hundred and forty-three surgeons answered the questionnaire and the meta-analysis included 66 articles.From the questionnaire, the preferred surgical approach was intra-oral except when the ETMM was in the condyle, when it was extra-oral (69.5%; p < 0.001). In the meta-analysis, an extra-oral approach was only indicated when a cutaneous fistula was present (90% vs. 35.9%; p = 0.002), irrespective of ETMM location. In the questionnaire and meta-analysis, the presence of a cyst did not change the approach (p < 0.05). The indications for a graft or osteosynthesis were a condylar location (p < 0.001), while a cutaneous fistula decreased the indication (p = 0.04) and a cyst (p = 0.009) was only associated with a graft.The preferential approach was intra-oral, except when the ETMM was condylar or a cutaneous fistula was present when an extra-oral approach was preferred. Osteosynthesis or a graft were more likely when the ETMM was in the condyle.This study will help to orientate surgeons vis-à-vis ETMM treatment.Conclusions: To identify the preferred surgical approach (intra- or extra-oral) to remove an ectopic third mandibular molar (ETMM) according on its location and presence of an associated cyst or cutaneous fistula, and to determine the indications for a graft or osteosynthesis.A surgical practice questionnaire was distributed to oral and maxillo-facial surgeons attending a National Congress of the French Society of Stomatology, Maxillo-facial and Oral Surgery. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was carried on Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and ScienceDirect databases using the MeSH terms: “Ectopic teeth”, “Third molar”, “Mandibular”. One hundred and forty-three surgeons answered the questionnaire and the meta-analysis included 66 articles.From the questionnaire, the preferred surgical approach was intra-oral except when the ETMM was in the condyle, when it was extra-oral (69.5%; p < 0.001). In the meta-analysis, an extra-oral approach was only indicated when a cutaneous fistula was present (90% vs. 35.9%; p = 0.002), irrespective of ETMM location. In the questionnaire and meta-analysis, the presence of a cyst did not change the approach (p < 0.05). The indications for a graft or osteosynthesis were a condylar location (p < 0.001), while a cutaneous fistula decreased the indication (p = 0.04) and a cyst (p = 0.009) was only associated with a graft.The preferential approach was intra-oral, except when the ETMM was condylar or a cutaneous fistula was present when an extra-oral approach was preferred. Osteosynthesis or a graft were more likely when the ETMM was in the condyle.This study will help to orientate surgeons vis-à-vis ETMM treatment.Clinical relevance: To identify the preferred surgical approach (intra- or extra-oral) to remove an ectopic third mandibular molar (ETMM) according on its location and presence of an associated cyst or cutaneous fistula, and to determine the indications for a graft or osteosynthesis.A surgical practice questionnaire was distributed to oral and maxillo-facial surgeons attending a National Congress of the French Society of Stomatology, Maxillo-facial and Oral Surgery. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was carried on Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and ScienceDirect databases using the MeSH terms: “Ectopic teeth”, “Third molar”, “Mandibular”. One hundred and forty-three surgeons answered the questionnaire and the meta-analysis included 66 articles.From the questionnaire, the preferred surgical approach was intra-oral except when the ETMM was in the condyle, when it was extra-oral (69.5%; p < 0.001). In the meta-analysis, an extra-oral approach was only indicated when a cutaneous fistula was present (90% vs. 35.9%; p = 0.002), irrespective of ETMM location. In the questionnaire and meta-analysis, the presence of a cyst did not change the approach (p < 0.05). The indications for a graft or osteosynthesis were a condylar location (p < 0.001), while a cutaneous fistula decreased the indication (p = 0.04) and a cyst (p = 0.009) was only associated with a graft.The preferential approach was intra-oral, except when the ETMM was condylar or a cutaneous fistula was present when an extra-oral approach was preferred. Osteosynthesis or a graft were more likely when the ETMM was in the condyle.This study will help to orientate surgeons vis-à-vis ETMM treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An ectopic supernumerary tooth causing the formation of rhinolith was never reported before in the medical literature. A 30 years old male patient presented to our hospital with one sided nasal obstruction, recurrent epistaxis, and nasal discharge. Anterior rhinoscopy, nasal endoscopy and X-ray paranasal sinuses revealed a rhinolith in the left nasal cavity. Preoperative evaluation and post operative examination of the specimen proved that the nidus of rhinolith was a supernumerary ectopic tooth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]