Search

We assessed the effect of habitat heterogeneity and predator density on the European hare (Lepus europaeus), a declining farmland specialist, in intensive farmlands in Central Europe. Using spotlight surveys we explored population density and habitat preference of the European hare in spring and autumn during 2014–2015 in seven farmland regions, of which six were located in the Czech Republic and one in Austria. The average population density of European hares significantly differed between study regions in the Czech Republic and Austria, however, we found no differences in population density between autumn and spring. In particular, the average European hare population density in study regions in the Czech Republic varied between 6.8–17.0 individuals/100 ha, whereas in Austria the population density reached 65.3 individuals/100 ha. Differences between spring and autumn population densities were not significant. European hare population density was significantly negatively affected by mean patch size and positively by area of arable land. We did not find a significant effect of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) presence on the numbers of European hares in individual regions. Habitat preferences differed among regions with contrasting population densities and field sizes, hares in regions of high density and small fields were more equally distributed among available habitats compared to regions of low or intermediate density and large fields. To conclude, conservation measures focusing on enhancing habitat heterogeneity by reducing field size may be an effective tool to support populations of European hares in arable farmland landscapes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We assessed the effect of habitat heterogeneity and predator density on the European hare ( Lepus europaeus ), a declining farmland specialist, in intensive farmlands in Central Europe. Using spotlight surveys we explored population density and habitat preference of the European hare in spring and autumn during 2014–2015 in seven farmland regions, of which six were located in the Czech Republic and one in Austria. The average population density of European hares significantly differed between study regions in the Czech Republic and Austria, however, we found no differences in population density between autumn and spring. In particular, the average European hare population density in study regions in the Czech Republic varied between 6.8–17.0 individuals/100 ha, whereas in Austria the population density reached 65.3 individuals/100 ha. Differences between spring and autumn population densities were not significant. European hare population density was significantly negatively affected by mean patch size and positively by area of arable land. We did not find a significant effect of red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) presence on the numbers of European hares in individual regions. Habitat preferences differed among regions with contrasting population densities and field sizes, hares in regions of high density and small fields were more equally distributed among available habitats compared to regions of low or intermediate density and large fields. To conclude, conservation measures focusing on enhancing habitat heterogeneity by reducing field size may be an effective tool to support populations of European hares in arable farmland landscapes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Use of habitat is a critical component related to structure of small-mammal communities, with partitioning occurring primarily along dimensions of microhabitat, although use of microhabitat often does not explain fully use at a macrohabitat level. Through grid studies of small mammals in coastal Colima, Mexico (during January 2003–2005), we appraised influence of available habitat, species richness, abundance, and cumulative abundance of other small mammals on variation in habitat used by species. We evaluated 14 habitat variables (reflecting ground cover, slope, canopy, and vegetation density on vertical and horizontal axes) and developed a composite variable (principal component 1) reflecting general openness of habitat through which we addressed habitat use. For the four most common mammalian species (Sigmodon mascotensis, Heteromys pictus, Baiomys musculus, and Oryzomys couesi), two measures of variation in habitat used were employed to estimate niche breadth, one of which assessed variation in habitat use relative to variation present on a grid. Sigmodon mascotensis and B. musculus preferred areas that were more open, and H. pictus and O. couesi occupied less-open areas; breadth of habitat use did not differ interspecifically. Habitat use was more variable on grids with more variability in habitat, although not greater than chance expectations. Findings do not lend support to the resource-breadth hypothesis as an explanation for population densities of species at a local level or the habitat-heterogeneity hypothesis as a predictor of species richness. Variation in habitat used by S. mascotensis did not proportionally increase when diverse habitat was available but was greater when the species was more abundant. For H. pictus, when cumulative abundance of other small mammals was greater, breadth of habitat used was greater. Intraspecific density-dependent habitat selection may result in S. mascotensis selecting a greater variety of habitats, while greater interspecific abundance is related to a greater range in use of habitats by H. pictus. Baiomys musculus used a higher proportion of habitat relative to that available when more species were present on a grid. Variation in habitat used by O. couesi was unrelated to any factor examined. Overall, the four species responded in notably different ways with respect to availability of habitat, abundance, and presence of other species. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]