Search

Increased fetal nuchal translucency (NT) is a common ultrasonic manifestation during pregnancy. Many studies have confirmed that NT ≥ 3 mm is a high risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome. However, when NT is between 2.5 and 2.9 mm, will it increase the risk of fetal chromosome abnormalities and other diseases? What is the most appropriate method for prenatal chromosome evaluation? At present, it has not been widely reported in the literature, and the conclusion is also controversial. This prospective cohort study included fetal samples from women who underwent amniocentesis from 2017 to 2020. The samples of the experimental group were fetuses with NT ≥ 2.5 mm at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation, with or without ultrasonographic anomaly. The control group contained fetal NT < 2.5 mm without ultrasonographic anomalies. All amniotic fluid samples were tested by copy number variants sequencing. In 262 fetal samples with isolated NT from 2.5 to 2.9 mm, the detection rate of aneuploidy was 3.4% (9/262), and the risk of aneuploidy was significantly higher than that of the control group (1.4%, 32/2331) (relative risk 2.5, 95% CI 1.2–5.2). The detection rates of other pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variants in the two groups were 0.8% (2/262) and 1.3% (31/2331), respectively, which was not statistically significant (relative risk 0.6, 95% CI 0.1–2.4). Our results showed that isolated NT from 2.5 to 2.9 mm increased the risk of fetal chromosome aneuploidy. Therefore, noninvasive prenatal screening is recommended as the first choice for prenatal chromosome evaluation in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of the combining CNV-seq and quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) for miscarriage analysis in clinical practice. Methods: Over a 35-month period, a total of 389 fetal specimens including 356 chorionic villi and 33 fetal muscle tissues were analyzed by CNV-seq and QF-PCR. Relationships between the risk factors (e.g., advanced maternal age, abnormal pregnancy history, and gestational age) and incidence of these chromosomal abnormalities were further analyzed by subgroup. Results: Clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 58.95% cases. Aneuploidy was the most common abnormality (46.84%), followed by polyploidy (8.16%) and structural chromosome anomalies (3.95%). In sub-group analysis, significant differences were found in the total frequency of chromosomal abnormalities between the early abortion and the late abortion group, as well as in the distribution of chromosomal abnormalities between the advanced and the younger maternal age group. Meanwhile, the results of the logistic regression analysis identified a trend suggesting that the percentage of fetal chromosomal abnormalities is significantly higher in advanced maternal age, lesser gestational age, and lesser number of prior miscarriages. Conclusion: Our study suggests that CNV-seq and QF-PCR are efficient and reliable technologies in the fetal chromosome analysis of miscarriages and could be used as a routine selection method for the genetic analysis of spontaneous abortion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Studies on the occurrence of segmental aneuploidoidy in fetuses with isolated echogenic intracardiac focus (EIF) are scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze whether there is an association between abnormal segmental aneuploidies and isolated EIF. This was a prospective case–control study. The study participants in the case group were fetuses that were diagnosed with isolated EIF. Samples without fetal ultrasound abnormalities but received prenatal diagnosis for other reasons (serological screening high-risk, voluntary request) were set as controls. All pregnant women were younger than 35 years old at the expected date of childbirth. Copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) was performed for all samples. The case group and control group successfully underwent CNV-seq analysis and exhibited 1,099 and 5,616 amniotic fluid samples, respectively. The detection rates of abnormal segmental aneuploidies in the case group and control group were 0.6% (7/1,099) and 1.1% (64/5,616), respectively; no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (x2 = 2.220, P = 0.136). Isolated EIF did not increase the risk of fetal segmental aneuploidies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The widespread application of high-resolution chromosome detection technology in clinical practice has identified many variants of unknown significance (VOUS) in prenatal diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze the chromosomal results of parents and the follow-up information of pregnancy outcomes of prenatal samples with VOUS, so as to determine the influence of the detection of parent-of-origin on the pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with VOUS. The present study analyzed amniotic fluid samples obtained from women with different risk indications between February 2017 and December 2018. The samples were subjected to copy number variation sequencing, and detection of parent-of-origin was suggested in cases of samples with VOUS. The pregnancy outcome was followed up. In a total of 14073 amniotic fluid samples, 729 cases of VOUS were detected (5.2%, 729/14073) and 721 cases were followed up successfully. Among the 721 cases, 525 patients agreed to detect the parent-of-origin (72.8%, 525/721). It was revealed that the VOUS in 460 of the fetuses were hereditary (87.6%, 460/525). The percentages of abnormal pregnancy outcomes (included pregnancy loss, fetal pathological abnormality, preterm delivery, neonatal death, birth defects) in the inherited, de novo, and refusal to detect the parent-of-origin (i.e. unknown origin) groups were 4.3% (20/460), 6.2% (4/65), and 6.6% (13/196), respectively. There was no significant difference among the three groups (P > 0.05). The rate of voluntary termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the unknown origin group was significantly higher than that in the group that had determined the parent-of-origin (14.3% vs 7.4%, P = 0.005). There is currently no evidence that suggests that the proportion of abnormal pregnancy outcomes is higher in fetuses with VOUS than in other fetuses. However, the present study revealed that determining the parent-of-origin affects the decision to undergo voluntary TOP, as the rate of voluntary TOP in the group that refused detection was higher than that in the group that consented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]