Search

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous and inflammatory disease with diverse clinical manifestations, including psoriasis, nail psoriasis, peripheral joint disease, axial joint disease, enthesitis, and dactylitis. Typically, this varied clinical presentation complicates the clinician's ability to distinguish PsA from other forms of arthritis. In the synovium of individuals with PsA, upregulation of the genes WNT3A, BMPR2, and TGFBR1 results in bone erosion and new bone formation, a pattern unique to the disease. Additionally, genes associated with angiogenesis and vascularization such as VEGF and TGFB1 facilitate inflammation and joint damage. Gross pathogenesis of PsA is driven by proinflammatory cytokines, and key cytokines affecting joint structures include tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17A, IL-21, IL-22, and IL-23. Early diagnosis is critical for providing treatment that prevents irreversible disease progression and function loss. This narrative review discusses differentiation of PsA from other forms of arthritis. Additionally, we detail the role of cytokines at the joint in mediating PsA pathogenesis. Funding: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of one and two intra-articular (IA) injections of the new viscosupplement, hylastan, compared with a single IA corticosteroid injection for pain due to knee osteoarthritis (OA). Hylastan is a high-molecular-weight hyaluronan derivative prepared from bacterial fermented sodium hyaluronate that was developed to remain in the joint for longer than most other viscosupplements. Methods: This 6-month, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, multicenter trial enrolled patients aged ≥40 years who met American College of Rheumatology criteria for knee OA and had continued pain despite conservative treatment. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to one of three arms: 2 × 4 mL hylastan ( n = 129; arthrocentesis then IA hylastan Day 0, same treatment Week 2); 1 × 4 mL hylastan ( n = 130; arthrocentesis then IA hylastan Day 0, arthrocentesis only Week 2); steroid ( n = 132; arthrocentesis then IA methylprednisolone acetate 40 mg Day 0, arthrocentesis only Week 2). Participants and evaluators were blinded to treatment. The primary clinical outcome measure was change from baseline in WOMAC A pain score over all postbaseline visits to Week 26. Results: Statistically significant pain reduction was observed in all three arms, with similar mean (95 % CI) changes in WOMAC A: 2 × 4 mL hylastan −0.9 (−1.0, −0.7); 1 × 4 mL hylastan −0.8 (−0.9, −0.7); steroid −0.9 (−1.0, −0.8); all P < 0.0001 versus baseline. Changes in secondary outcomes (OMERACT-OARSI and WOMAC A responder rates, patient/clinical observer global assessments, and WOMAC A1 walking pain) were similar in all three arms. Target knee adverse events were comparable for all treatments. Conclusions: Both IA hylastan injection regimens were effective in relieving pain with an acceptable safety profile. IA hylastan did not show a difference versus IA corticosteroid; therefore, the hypothesis of superior pain relief was not met. Further research is needed to compare the efficacy and safety of hylastan with other viscosupplements. Level of evidence: Therapeutic study, Level I. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]