1. Augmented reality for measuring diameter at breast height using the iPhone measure app: outcomes on tree- and stand-level estimates of basal area in a Carpathian mixed forest.
- Author
-
Apăfăian, Andrei Ioan, Avasiloaie, Andrei, and Vasilescu, Maria Magdalena
- Abstract
In almost all cases, forest inventories require the measurement of diameter at breast height (DBH) and tree height, which are essential for the quantitative study of trees and stand structure, as well as for estimating forest stand parameters. Taking into account the digitization trend, this article aims to address the possibility of using the Measure app, a free and common application integrated into the new smartphone models that use the iOS operating system, to measure DBH, by highlighting the impact of diameter measurement errors on tree- and stand-level basal area. To achieve our objectives, two rectangular plots of 1 ha each were established in an uneven-aged mixed forest from Eastern Carpathians. DBH on two orthogonal directions was measured for 888 trees using a caliper and the Measure app built-in operating system iOS 14 (Apple Inc., Cupertino, California, USA), and girth at the level of 1.30 m was measured using a tape. Stand basal area was also estimated by point sampling running 120 horizontal point samples with various basal area factors. The mean error (ME
DBH ), the absolute mean error (AMEDBH ), and the root mean squared error (RMSEDBH ) in the breast height diameters were calculated by species. DBH differences were tested using the paired samples t test and the related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank test. Furthermore, the correlation coefficient (R) and multiple R were computed by species to identify the relation between basal area error and various tree characteristics. Our study showed that there was a tendency to underestimate diameters when the app was used, and thus mean DBH was underestimated by 0.45–0.89 cm in the case of the conifers and by 0.17–0.71 cm in the case of the broadleaves. By using the iPhone Measure app, AMEDBH varied from 0.96 to 1.51 cm, while RMSEDBH varied between 1.15 and 1.92 cm. In the cases of the sessile oak and sycamore trees, no significant differences were found between DBH measured by caliper and by app, while for the other species, the differences were significant. Therefore, the ± 5% frequency of individual errors when estimating basal area was reduced by approximately half in the case of using the app as opposed to the caliper, and the risk of recording errors > 10% in tree basal area estimation was 26 times higher. For the most part, basal area error at tree level was determined by the error in DBH measurement, but tree size and the ovality of the cross-sections also contributed to a smaller degree. The tendency to underestimate DBH when the iPhone Measure app was used resulted in underestimating stand basal area by approximately 4.1%. Considering the DBH derived from girth measurement as reference, stand basal area was estimated by the iPhone Measure app with a difference of -6.50%. In contrast, point sampling produced better results using BAF = 4 m2 ha− 1 . Despite the fact that the iPhone Measure app is a convenient digital measurement tool, it still requires upgrades of certain details to achieve the accuracy of the caliper, so that in the near future this type of application can be used on a wider scale to collect field data related to tree diameter and height, as well as to estimate stand basal area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF