Search

This correction notice addresses minor errors in the original article titled "Targeting DORIS Remission and LLDAS in SLE: A Review." The errors pertain to the definition of DORIS remission and the data presented in Tables 1 and 3. The corrected definition of DORIS remission includes achieving a clinical SLEDAI-2K = 0 and a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) < 0.5, irrespective of serology, with the use of antimalarials, low-dose glucocorticoids, and/or stable doses of immunosuppressants. The updated data in Table 3 shows changes in the number and percentage of patients achieving DORIS remission in the placebo group, as well as updated odds ratios and p-values for the comparison between treatment groups. The original article has been corrected. [Extracted from the article]

Remission is the established therapeutic goal for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is currently defined by the widely adopted Definition Of Remission In SLE (DORIS) criteria. Attainment of remission is rare in the clinical setting, thus an alternative, pragmatic treatment target of low disease activity, as defined by the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), provides a less stringent and more attainable treatment goal for a wider proportion of patients compared with DORIS remission. Randomized controlled trials and real-world analyses have confirmed the positive clinical benefits of achieving either DORIS remission or LLDAS. The treat-to-target (T2T) approach utilizes practical clinical targets to proactively tailor individual treatment regimens. Studies in other chronic inflammatory diseases using the T2T approach demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes and quality-of-life measures compared with established standard of care. However, such trials have not yet been performed in patients with SLE. Here we review the evolution of DORIS remission and LLDAS definitions and the evidence supporting the positive clinical outcomes following DORIS remission or LLDAS attainment, before discussing considerations for implementation of these outcome measures as potential T2T objectives. Adoption of DORIS remission and LLDAS treatment goals may result in favorable patient outcomes compared with established standard of care for patients with SLE. Plain Language Summary: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex disease that can affect many organs. It can lead to life-threatening complications and poor quality of life. As SLE is very different in each person, it can be challenging to measure disease activity. Doctors are encouraged to set clinical targets to tailor treatment for each patient. Clinical targets include scoring systems that measure disease improvement. Remission is an established clinical target. When a patient is in remission, disease activity is controlled, and the patient does not experience any symptoms. As remission is difficult to achieve, experts developed a more realistic yet still favorable state. This is the lupus low disease activity state, when lupus symptoms are minimal on stable therapy. Doctors use remission and low disease activity in clinical trials to compare existing SLE drugs with new treatments, including biologic drugs. Biologics target key parts of the immune system to help suppress SLE. In this review, we looked at recent clinical trials and found that biologic drugs can help patients achieve remission or low disease activity. Patients who achieved these clinical targets had slower disease progression and improved quality of life. Clinical trials in SLE should continue to use remission and low disease activity targets to help compare treatments. Doctors are encouraged to use them in their routine clinics as treatment targets to measure SLE disease control. Low disease activity state may be particularly helpful as an initial target for patients who are not yet in remission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The type I interferon (IFN) signaling pathway is implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Anifrolumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the type I IFN receptor subunit 1. Anifrolumab is approved in several countries for patients with moderate to severe SLE receiving standard therapy. The approved dosing regimen of anifrolumab is a 300-mg dose administered intravenously every 4 weeks; this was initially based on the results of the Phase 2b MUSE and further confirmed in the Phase 3 TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials, in which anifrolumab 300-mg treatment was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity with an acceptable safety profile. There have been several published analyses of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of anifrolumab, including a population–pharmacokinetic analysis of 5 clinical studies of healthy volunteers and patients with SLE, in which body weight and type I IFN gene expression were significant covariates identified for anifrolumab exposure and clearance. Additionally, the pooled Phase 3 SLE population has been used to evaluate how serum exposure may be related to clinical responses, safety risks, and pharmacodynamic effects of the 21-gene type I IFN gene signature (21-IFNGS). The relevance of 21-IFNGS with regard to clinical efficacy outcomes has also been analyzed. Herein, the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of anifrolumab as well as results of population–pharmacokinetics and exposure–response analyses are reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Dexmecamylamine (TC-5214) is a nicotinic channel modulator that was evaluated as a potential adjunct treatment to an antidepressant for patients with major depressive disorder. Dexmecamylamine is almost completely eliminated via the kidneys, with more than 90 % of a given dose excreted unchanged in urine. The aim of this study was to assess the single-dose pharmacokinetics of dexmecamylamine in subjects with various degrees of renal impairment and subjects undergoing hemodialysis. Methods: A single-dose, open-label, parallel-group study was conducted at two study centers in the USA. There were four treatment groups with eight subjects in each, receiving a single dose of dexmecamylamine 8 mg (subjects with normal renal function and mild renal impairment) or TC-5412 2 mg [subjects with moderate renal impairment and end-stage renal disease (ESRD)]. The pharmacokinetics of dexmecamylamine in plasma, urine, and dialysate were evaluated using non-compartmental analysis. Results: The plasma pharmacokinetics of dexmecamylamine were influenced by renal function. The increase in dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was statistically significant with an approximately doubled exposure in subjects with moderate renal impairment compared with subjects with normal renal function. The maximum plasma concentration was not impacted by renal function. Plasma clearance of dexmecamylamine in ESRD subjects appeared negligible, with flat plasma concentration-time profiles. Hemodialysis had a relatively modest effect on reduction of dexmecamylamine plasma concentrations. There was no discernable relationship between renal clearance and urinary pH. Conclusion: Renal impairment increased the AUC, prolonged the elimination half-life, and decreased the clearance of dexmecamylamine following administration as a single oral dose. It is likely that renal function would need to be taken into account when setting the dose. Dexmecamylamine administration should be avoided or the dose significantly reduced in patients with severe renal impairment and ESRD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]