Search

Aim: The differentiation between epileptic and non-epileptic episodes can be challenging. Our aim was to compare lactate, anion gap (AG), bicarbonate and the Denver Seizure Score (DSS) as point-of-care test (POCT) markers for episodes of transient alterations of consciousness.Methods: The blood serum parameters were drawn at arrival in the emergency department (ED) within 2 h of the episode. After calculating AG and DSS values, the four parameters were compared retrospectively between patients with generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) (n = 165) and patients with other disorders of consciousness [syncopes (n = 43), and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (n = 15)]. Additionally, we compared all values among men and women.Results: In GTCS patients, all four parameters differed significantly compared to non-epileptic episode patients (p < 0.001). Serum lactate showed significant additional benefit over the remaining values, with an AUC of 0.947 (95% CI 0.92-0.975) and a high sensitivity and specificity for an optimal cut-off value of 2.45 mmol/l. For DSS, the AUC was 0.857 (95% CI 0.808-0.906; cut-off: 0.35), and for AG 0.836 (95% CI 0.783-0.889; cut-off: 12.45 mmol/l). In the case of serum bicarbonate, the AUC was 0.831 (95% CI 0.775-0.886; cut-off: 22.75 mmol/l). In the sex-dependent comparison, the results were similar. Men showed more significant differences in the compared values than women.Conclusions: Serum lactate is best suited as POCT marker in the differential diagnosis of epileptic and non-epileptic episodes and is superior to AG, DSS and bicarbonate. The differences among sexes may pose a challenge in their implementation and interpretation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Nervenarzt is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In limbic encephalitis (LE) with antibodies (Abs) to the voltage-gated potassium channel complex (VGKC), the Abs are mainly directed to the VGKC-complex proteins, leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 protein (LGI1) or contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR-2) or neither. Here, we relate the outcomes of VGKC-LE patients to the presence of Abs to LGI1, CASPR-2 or neither antigen (LGI1/CASPR-2-Ab). Clinical, neuropsychology and MRI data were obtained from patient records for all LE patients from the Bonn Epilepsy Centre positive for VGKC-Abs by radioimmunoprecipitation assay between 2002 and 2011. Eighteen VGKC-LE patients were identified: nine patients (50 %) had LGI1-Abs, three (16 %) had CASPR-2-Abs; and six (33 %) were negative for both LGI1- and CASPR-2-Abs. At first assessment, the groups did not differ clinically or radiologically, but faciobrachial dystonic seizures were only observed in two LGI1-Ab patients. All patients received monthly intravenous methylprednisolone (MP) pulses. At the most recent follow up (median 26 months), thirteen (72 %) were seizure-free, and seizure-freedom rates did not differ between the Ab groups. Hippocampal atrophy had developed in 7/9 LGI1-Ab patients, but in none of the CASPR-2-Ab or LGI/CASPR-2-Ab patients ( p = 0.003). While all subgroups improved, memory scores only normalized in six patients (33 %) and LGI1-Ab patients were left with significantly poorer memory than the other two subgroups. Most VGKC-LE patients become seizure-free with pulsed monthly MP, but memory outcome is less favourable. Hippocampal atrophy and poor memory recovery is common in patients with LGI1-Abs and suggests permanent functional damage. More intense immunotherapies could improve outcomes in LGI1-Ab-LE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Epileptologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

A letter to the editor regarding spinal subarachnoid hemorrhage is presented.