Search

UbiquitinC-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) is a cysteine hydrolase. It functions as a ubiquitin hydrolase, stabilizes the ubiquitin monomer, and affects cell division through cell cycle protein deubiquitination. Abnormal UCH-L1 expression is closely related to the occurrence and development of several tumors. Although some in vitro studies have demonstrated the significance of UCH-L1 in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), only few clinical studies have focused on the UCH-L1 expression in NSCLC, and the results are controversial and non-uniform. We investigated the UCH-L1 expression in 401 cases of surgically resected NSCLC, including 286 cases of adenocarcinoma (ADC) and 65 cases of squamous cell carcinoma. The associations between the UCH-L1 expression and clinicopathological features, programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and prognostic significance were analyzed. For NSCLC, the UCH-L1 expression is associated with sex, smoking history, tumor size (>3 cm), lymphocyte infiltration, advanced pathological stages, and shortened overall survival (OS; 89.72 vs. 114.55 months; P = 0.005), but not PD-L1 expression. The UCH-L1 expression in ADC is associated with advanced pathological stages, pleural invasion, and shortened OS (90.38 vs. 118.55 months; P = 0.010). Multivariate analysis confirmed that UCH-L1 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor for NSCLC (OS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.854; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.132–3.038; P = 0.014). Our results suggest that the UCH-L1 expression differs across tumors with different clinicopathological features, and it is related to poor prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) are both small tumors with good prognosis after surgical resection, and most of them present as ground glass opacities (GGOs) on computed tomography (CT) screening. However, the differences in clinicopathologic features and genetic alterations between AIS and MIA are poorly elaborated, and few studies have evaluated the prognosis of MIA with different invasive components. Meanwhile, the histological features of lung lesions presenting as unchanged pure GGOs are barely understood. Methods: Clinicopathologic features and genetic alterations of AIS (n = 59) and MIA (n = 62) presenting as GGOs were analyzed. Long-term preoperative observation (ranging from 2 to 1967 days) and postoperative follow-up (ranging from 0 to 92 months) was conducted. Results: The tumor size and consolidation/tumor ratio were significantly larger in the MIA cohort than those in the AIS cohort both on CT and microscopy images. Immunohistochemically, the expression of p53, Ki67, and cyclin D1 was higher in MIA than in AIS. The EGFR mutation rate was significantly higher in MIA, while other genetic alterations showed no differences. Six MIA cases showed recurrence or metachronous adenocarcinoma and all the cases with a predominant micropapillary invasive pattern demonstrated this feature. Conclusions: The current CT measurements may be helpful in distinguishing AIS from MIA, but show limited utility in predicting the histology of unchanged pure GGOs. The invasive pattern may have an influence on the postoperative process of MIA; therefore, further studies are needed to evaluate the current diagnostic criteria and treatment strategy for MIA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ROS1 has attracted much attention as a possible oncogenic driver and ROS1-rearranged tumors show sensitivity to most ALK inhibitors. We aimed to clarify the prevalence of ROS1 gene rearrangement and investigate the clinical implications of ROS1 gene copy number gain (CNG) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We carried out fluorescent in situ hybridization with ROS1 and centromere enumeration 6 probes and immunohistochemistry for ROS1 protein expression. ROS1 rearrangement was detected in 3 of 375 samples (0.8 %); all of whom were female, never-smokers, and harbored an adenocarcinoma component. ROS1 gene CNG was found in 18 cases (4.8 %). ROS1 gene CNG was significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS, 12 vs. 58 months; p = 0.003) and shorter overall survival (OS, 40 vs. 67 months; p <0.001) than the group without CNG. Multivariate analysis confirmed that ROS1 gene CNG was significantly associated with poorer DFS (hazard ratio [HR]=2.16, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.22-3.81, p = 0.008), and OS ([HR] = 2.53, 95 % [CI] = 1.31-4.89, p = 0.006). ROS1 protein overexpression was observed in 5.0 % (18 out of 357), of which 2 cases harbored ROS1 gene rearrangement. There was no statistically significant correlation between ROS1 gene CNG and protein overexpression. This study demonstrated ROS1 gene rearrangement was detected in 0.8 % of surgically resected NSCLC; and ROS1 gene CNG is an independent poor prognostic factor. This survival analyses may contribute to future studies on the utility of ROS1-targeted therapy for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Yes-associated protein (YAP) has been reported to be associated with the prognosis of various cancers and also to affect epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) activity in ovarian cancer cell lines. However, few studies have evaluated YAP protein expression in lung cancer, and the results have lacked consistency. Methods: YAP expression was evaluated in a total of 205 curatively resected lung adenocarcinomas and 36 cases of EGFR-mutated TKI-treated patients. Correlations between the expression of YAP and clinicopathologic features, response to EGFR-TKI treatment, and prognostic significance were analyzed. Results: High cytoplasmic YAP expression was positively correlated with the clinicopathologic parameters that have been associated with favorable prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that high cytoplasmic YAP expression was an independent prognostic factor in lung adenocarcinomas (progression-free survival: hazard ratio [HR] 0.659; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.431-1.010; p = 0.050; overall survival: HR, 0.474; 95 % CI 0.263-0.854; p = 0.013) and EGFR-TKI-treated patients with EGFR mutation (progression-free survival: HR, 0.346; 95 % CI 0.146-0.818; p = 0.016; overall survival: HR, 0.291; 95 % CI 0.125-0.676; p = 0.004). Conclusions: High cytoplasmic YAP expression predicted a good clinical outcome for patients with lung adenocarcinoma and in EGFR-TKI-treated patients. Therefore, YAP may play a role in EGFR-TKI-treated lung cancer, and YAP targeting may enhance therapeutic effects in combination with other cancer drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

FGFR1 amplification has been identified recently as an important therapeutic target in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC). However, data from previous studies on the clinical implications of FGFR amplification in NSCLC are inconsistent. We evaluated FGFR1 gene copy number (GCN) in 369 cases of surgically resected NSCLC using five previously reported criteria and investigated associations between clinicopathologic parameters and FGFR1 amplification. FGFR1 amplification was found in 32/369 (8.7 %) of NSCLC and was more frequent in SqCC (18.0 % in SqCC, 3.0 % in adenocarcinoma; p < 0.001) and in smokers ( p < 0.001). On univariate analysis, FGFR1 amplification was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS, 58.6 vs 80.0 months; p = 0.033) and shorter disease-free survival (DFS, 58.5 vs 80.0 months; p = 0.042) in patients with SqCC, but this was not statistically significant on multivariate analysis (OS: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.79, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.83-3.87, p = 0.139; DFS: HR = 1.73, 95 % CI = 0.93-3.21, p = 0.081). The correlation between FGFR1 amplification and protein expression was poor (rho = 0.08; p = 0.123). These results suggest that FGFR1 amplification is associated with smoking history and squamous cell carcinoma histology and might indicate poor prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: MET gene copy number gain (CNG) and protein overexpression have been reported in lung cancer, but the clinical implications in early stage adenocarcinoma remain unclear. Methods: We investigated MET gene copy number and protein expression in 141 cases of surgically resected stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma. MET gene CNG was determined by silver in situ hybridization, and MET protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The correlation between MET gene CNG/protein expression and clinicopathologic parameters and prognostic significance was analyzed. Results: MET gene CNG was found in 24.1 % (34 of 141) of the cases and was associated with larger tumor size, pleural invasion, and lymphatic vessel invasion. MET gene CNG was inversely correlated with the presence of lepidic subtype ( r = −0.17, p = 0.045) and was not associated with EGFR, KRAS mutation, or ALK gene rearrangement. In addition, MET gene CNG was significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (49 vs. 75 months; p < 0.001) and shorter overall survival (OS) (65 vs. 78 months; p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed that MET gene CNG was significantly associated with poorer DFS [ p < 0.001; hazard ratio (HR) 5.5; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.2-13.9] but was not significantly associated with OS. MET overexpression was observed in 71.3 % of cases (97 of 136), but it was not correlated with gene CNG. Conclusions: MET gene CNG is an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma. It is associated with aggressive pathologic features and is inversely correlated with the presence of lepidic subtype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation alone may be insufficient to predict clinical outcomes in the response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. The secondary mutation T790 M and MET amplification are mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI in approximately 50 % of patients, but the remaining mechanisms are unknown. Methods: Eight metastatic lesions and specimens from 41 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients harbouring activating EGFR mutations who underwent surgical resection and EGFR-TKI therapy were available. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate E-cadherin, β-catenin, and PTEN. Chromogenic in situ hybridisation and silver-enhanced in situ hybridisation were used to evaluate EGFR and MET amplification. Results: Patients with E-cadherin/β-catenin alteration showed a poor objective response rate (ORR) ( p = 0.005) and shorter overall survival ( p = 0.059). Additionally, β-catenin alteration was associated with a poor ORR ( p = 0.012). Of the metastatic tumours, three cases (37.5 %) showed the acquisition of altered E-cadherin/β-catenin and PTEN loss and two cases (25 %) demonstrated MET/ EGFR amplification. Conclusions: Altered E-cadherin/β-catenin expression in NSCLC harbouring EGFR mutations was associated with a poor response to EGFR-TKI. During metastatic progression, changes in E-cadherin/β-catenin were found. These results may suggest that E-cadherin/β-catenin alteration is related to poor TKI response and resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Survivin is a member of the inhibitors of apoptosis and frequently overexpressed in various cancer cells. Overexpression of survivin in lung cancer cells attenuates antitumor effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, data from the previous studies on the clinicopathologic implication of survivin in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) are inconsistent. We investigated the expression of survivin in 373 cases of surgically resected NSCLC. Correlations between the expression of survivin and clinicopathologic, molecular features and prognostic significance were analyzed. In adenocarcinoma, the increased expression of survivin was associated with the presence of vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and tumor recurrences, but we didn't find any correlation with survivin expression and clinicopathological parameters in squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with high survivin expression had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS; 42.2 vs. 58.8 months; p = 0.001) and shorter overall survival (OS; 60.8 vs. 71.5 months; p = 0.009) than those with low survivin expression group in adenocarcinoma. In squamous cell carcinoma, the expression of survivin was not associated with prognosis of the patients (DFS; 48.9 vs. 48.7 months; p = 0.837, OS; 61.0 vs. 62.4 months; p = 0.771). Multivariate analysis confirmed that survivin was an independent poor prognostic factor in adenocarcinoma (DFS: hazard ratio (HR), 1.687; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.123-2.532; p = 0.012; OS: HR, 1.965; 95 % CI, 1.108-3.486; p = 0.021). There was no statistically significant difference in the expression of survivin among different molecular subgroups ( p > 0.05). Our results suggest that survivin is an independent negative prognostic factor in adenocarcinoma, but not in squamous cell carcinoma. The different prognostic roles played by survivin in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma highlights the biological differences between these two histologic types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A correction to the article "ROS1 Gene Rearrangement and Copy Number Gain in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer" that was published online in the April 17, 2015 issue is presented.