Search

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is usually caused by germline mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. The classic form is characterized by hundreds to thousands of adenomas in the colorectum and early onset colorectal cancer (CRC) if left untreated. FAP is also associated with multiple extra-colonic manifestations such as gastroduodenal polyps, osteomas, epidermoid cysts, fibromas and desmoids. Most desmoid tumours in FAP patients occur intra-abdominally. Approximately 15-20% of the APC mutations are de novo mutations. Somatic mosaicism has been reported in some sporadic cases of polyposis but is probably an underestimated cause of the disease. This case report presents the detection of a mosaic APC mutation in a 26-year-old woman who as a child had been diagnosed with desmoid type fibromatosis. FAP was suggested when she presented with extensive extra abdominal fibromatosis. Our findings indicate that APC mutations may be suspected in patients presenting with a desmoid regardless of its location. If there is clinical evidence that the patient has FAP, adenomas and colonic mucosa in addition to leukocyte DNA should be included in the screening, preferably using methods that are more sensitive than Sanger sequencing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report prospectively observed risk for breast cancer in breast cancer kindreds without a demonstrable BRCA1/ 2 mutation. According to family history, the optimal available member(s) of each breast cancer kindred attending our clinic was tested for BRCA mutations. Women in families without a demonstrable BRCA mutation were subjected to annual mammography. BRCA mutations were demonstrated in 496/2,118 (23 %) breast cancer kindreds. In families without a demonstrable BRCA mutation, a total of 3,161 healthy women aged 25-59 years were prospectively followed for 24,808 observation years. Sixty-four cancers were observed, compared to 34.0 expected ( p < 0.01), arriving at a 7.9 % cumulative risk at age 60 compared to 4.0 % in the population [relative risk (RR) = 2.0]. Women with one mother or sister affected ≤50 years and with no other close relatives with breast cancer did not have increased risk (0 cancers observed and 0.6 expected at age 40, 11 cancers observed and 7.9 expected at age 60, p > 0.05). Excluding these, cumulative risk at 60 years was 8.8 % (RR = 2.2). The highest cumulative risk at 60 years was 11.4 %, found in families with two cases ≤55 years (RR = 2.8). In breast cancer kindreds without a demonstrable BRCA mutation, the risk for breast cancer in female first degree relatives was about twice the risk in the general population. Women with one early affected relative only did not have increased risk for early onset breast cancer, while those with more than one young affected relative had close to three times population risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report the 5- and 10-year survival rate of women diagnosed with breast cancer in the context of an annual MRI-based surveillance program. In 2001, as part of a national initiative, women in Norway with a BRCA1 mutation were offered annual screening with breast MRI in addition to mammography. 802 women with a BRCA1 mutation were screened one or more times and followed for a mean of 4.2 years. As of December 2011, 68 of 802 women in the screening program were diagnosed with DCIS or invasive breast cancer (8.5 %), including eight prevalent, 50 incident screen-detected and eight interval cancers. Two latent cancers were detected at prophylactic mastectomy. Sixty-three of the cancers were invasive and five were in situ. The mean tumour size was 1.4 cm (range 0.2-4.5 cm), and 85 % of the patients were node-negative. Ten of the 68 patients died of cancer in the follow-up period. The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival for women with cancer was 75 % (95 % CI 56-86 %) and the 10-year survival was 69 % (95 % CI: 48-83 %). The 5-year survival for women with Stage 1 breast cancer was 82 % compared to 98 % in the population. The 5- and 10-year survival of women with a BRCA1-associated breast cancer detected in a national MRI-based screening program in BRCA1 mutation carriers Norway was less than anticipated. The benefit of annual MRI surveillance on reducing breast cancer mortality in BRCA1 mutation carriers remains to be proven. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endometrial cancer is frequent in MMR-mutation carriers. Estimates of annual incidence rates have, however, been based on retrospective studies. The purpose of our study was to prospectively assess the incidence rates of endometrial cancer in women either having a mutation in one of the four MMR genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2 (Mut+) or belonging to families meeting the revised Amsterdam criteria in which no MMR mutation was detected (Ams+). Eight out of 80 Mut+ (10%) contracted invasive endometrial cancer compared to 1/171 (0.6%) of the Ams+ ( P = 0.0006). The annual incidence rate after first control was 2.5% in Mut+ and 0.2% in Ams+. Two of the 8 Mut+ women (25%) had synchronous gynaecological tumours. The numbers included did not allow for firm conclusions, but the results are in keeping with the notion that the inherited colon-endometrial cancer syndrome may be restricted to carriers of MMR mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although quality of life (QoL) and mental distress in women belonging to familial cancer families have been studied, little is known on these matters in women with absence of demonstrated mutations. The aim of this study was to examine QoL and cancer-related distress in such women. Methods: About 330 women at risk for familial cancers in the absence of demonstrated mutations were invited to the study. About 239 women (72%) (risk group) completed the Short Form 12 (SF-12) and the Impact of Event Scale (IES). The SF-12-findings were compared to the age-adjusted findings from the general female population (controls). Results: The risk group had significantly better physical QoL than controls, while no significant difference was found for mental QoL. Within the risk group the type of familial cancer did not make a significant difference in QoL, but to have a father with cancer or a deceased parent, was associated with increased risk of being a case with low QoL. Mental QoL showed moderate correlation with cancer-related distress. Conclusions: : Women belonging to familial cancer families in the absence of demonstrated mutations had at least as good QoL as controls in spite of living with a permanent cancer-related threat. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Aim: To examine psychological distress in women at risk of familial breast–ovarian cancer (FBOC) or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) with absence of demonstrated mutations in the family (unknown mutation).Materials and methods: Two-hundred and fifty three consecutive women at risk of FBOC and 77 at risk of HNPCC and with no present or past history of cancer. They were aware of their risk and had received genetic counseling. Comparisons were made between these two groups, normal controls, and women who were identified to be BRCA1 mutation carriers. The questionnaires Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Impact of Event Scale (IES) were employed to assess psychological distress.Results: No significant differences concerning psychological distress were observed between women with FBOC and women with HNPCC. Compared to mutation carriers for BRCA1, the level of anxiety and depression was significantly higher in the FBOC group with absence of demonstrated mutation. Compared to normal controls, the level of anxiety was higher, while the level of depression was lower in the groups with unknown mutation.Conclusions: Women in the absence of demonstrated mutations have higher anxiety and depression levels than women with known mutation-carrier status. Access to genetic testing may be of psychologically benefit to women at risk for FBOC or HNPCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) may be caused by germline truncating mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Whether or not missense or inframe mutations are disease-associated has become a practical clinical problem, because predictive genetic testing is employed to select high-risk persons for clinical examinations. Clinical examinations may reveal polyps to be removed and prevent cancer. One large kindred applying for health care had a N596del mutation in the MSH2 gene. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not the inframe mutation in this family was associated with disease, and to examine the tumours for presence of the MSH2 protein by immunohistochemistry. We demonstrated that the mutation was linked to disease with lod score 5.7 in the family, and all examined, but one manifest cancer, lacked the MSH2 protein. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aims: Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) may be caused by mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6. Family history (Amsterdam criteria) has traditionally been used to select patients for mutation testing. It has been demonstrated that germline mutations in the MMR genes are associated with lack of the corresponding gene product as assessed with immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tumour specimens. The aim of the study was to assess the value of the Amsterdam criteria II and IHC in predicting germline mutations. Methods: Fifty-six families that were previously tested for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutations were selected for this study. All pedigrees were extended and verified and the families were scored according to the original (I) and the revised Amsterdam criteria (II). The probabilities for MLH1 and MSH2 mutations were calculated by logistic regression. In addition, all available tumour material from indexed family members was examined by IHC for the presence of the three gene products. Results: Three out of seven (39%) families where the mutation could be identified complied with the Amsterdam criteria I, while all seven (100%) met the Amsterdam criteria II. All families carrying a MLH1 or MSH2 mutation had > 15% calculated probability of finding a mutation. Tumours from all seven mutation carriers lacked the immunohistochemical expression of the corresponding MMR gene. Conclusion: The results indicate that the Amsterdam criteria II in combination with immunohistochemistry of the mismatch repair proteins in tumours may be a cost-effective approach to select families for mutation analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Focuses on familial endometrial cancer in female carriers of MSH6 repair gene germline mutations. Truncating mutations at MSH6 in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; Microsatellite analysis in tumors of four kindreds with truncating MSH6 mutations; Detection of missense MSH6 mutations.