Search

Satellite-based vegetation indices are an essential element in understanding the Earth's surface. In this study, we estimated the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) using Himawari-8/Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) data and analyzed the sensitivity of products to atmospheric and surface correction. We used the Second Simulation of a Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum (6S) radiative transfer model for atmospheric correction, and kernel-based semi-empirical bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) model to remove surface anisotropic effects. From this, top-of-atmosphere, top-of-canopy, and normalized NDVIs were produced. A sensitivity analysis showed that the normalized NDVI had the lowest number of missing values compared with the others and almost no low peaks during the study period. These results were validated by Terra and Aqua/Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Project for On-Board Autonomy/Vegetation (PROBA) NDVI product, showing the root mean square error (RMSE) and bias of 0.09 and + 0.04 (MODIS) and 0.09 and − 0.04 (PROBA), respectively. These results also satisfied the FP7 Geoland2/BioPar project-defined user requirements (threshold: 0.15; target: 0.10). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We propose a methodology employing an interpolation technique on the Second Simulation of a Satellite Signal (6S) look-up table (LUT) to improve surface reflectance retrieval using Himawari-8/Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI). A minimum curvature surface (MCS) technique was used to refine the 6S LUT, and the solar zenith angle (SZA) and viewing zenith angle (VZA) increments were narrowed by 0.5°. The interpolation processing time was relatively short, about 3172 s per channel, and the interpolated xa and xb were well represented by the changes in SZA and VZA. An evaluation of the interpolated xa and xb for six cases revealed a relative mean absolute error of less than 5% for all channels and cases; however, a slight difference was evident for higher values of SZA and VZA. To evaluate the surface reflectance, we compared the surface reflectance derived using 6S LUT with that calculated using 6S only. Application of the interpolated 6S LUT showed a lower relative root mean square error (RRMSE) of 0.65% to 9.29% for all channels, than before interpolation. The improvement in surface reflectance measurements increased with the SZA. For a SZA above 75°, the RRMSE improved significantly for all channels (by 11.33–45.1%). In addition, when the MCS method was applied, the surface reflectance measurements improved without spatial discontinuity and showed good agreement with 6S results in a linear profile analyses. Thus, the method proposed can improve LUT based surface reflectance measurements in less time and increase the availability of surface reflectance data based on geostationary satellites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]