Search

Purpose: To characterize T1 relaxation times of the pancreas, liver, and spleen in children with and without abdominal pathology. Methods: This retrospective study included pediatric patients (< 18-years-old). T1 mapping was performed with a Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery sequence. Patients were grouped based on review of imaging reports and electronic medical records. The Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparison was used to compare groups. Results: 220 participants were included (mean age: 11.4 ± 4.2 years (1.5 T); 10.9 ± 4.5 years (3 T)). Pancreas T1 (msec) was significantly different between subgroups at 1.5 T (p < 0.0001). Significant pairwise differences included: normal (median: 583; IQR: 561–654) vs. acute pancreatitis (731; 632–945; p = 0.0024), normal vs. chronic pancreatitis (700; 643–863; p = 0.0013), and normal vs. acute + chronic pancreatitis (1020; 897–1099; p < 0.0001). Pancreas T1 was also significantly different between subgroups at 3 T (p < 0.0001). Significant pairwise differences included: normal (779; 753–851) vs. acute pancreatitis (1087; 910–1259; p = 0.0012), and normal vs. acute + chronic pancreatitis (1226; 1025–1367; p < 0.0001). Liver T1 was significantly different between subgroups only at 3 T (p = 0.0011) with pairwise differences between normal (818, 788–819) vs. steatotic (959; 848–997; p = 0.0017) and normal vs. other liver disease (882; 831–904; p = 0.0455). Liver T1 was weakly correlated with liver fat fraction at 1.5 T (r = 0.39; 0.24–0.52; p < 0.0001) and moderately correlated at 3 T (r = 0.64; 0.49–0.76; p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in splenic T1 relaxation times between subgroups. Conclusion: Pancreas T1 relaxation times are higher at 1.5 T and 3 T in children with pancreatitis and liver T1 relaxation times are higher in children with steatotic and non-steatotic chronic liver disease at 3 T. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Our primary purpose was to understand the correlation between pancreas T1-weighted signal intensity ratio (SIR) and T1 relaxation time in children. We also sought to characterize differences in T1 SIR between children without and with pancreatitis.Retrospective study of patients < 18-years-old. SIR-pancreas:spleen (SIR-PS) and SIR-pancreas:paraspinal muscle (SIR-PM) were generated from T1-weighted gradient recalled echo images. Subdivided by field strength, T1 SIR was correlated (Spearman’s) with T1 relaxation time.220 participants were included, 144 imaged at 1.5T (mean: 11.4 ± 4.2 years) and 76 imaged at 3T (mean: 10.9 ± 4.5 years). At 1.5T, SIR-PS (rho=-0.62, 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.51, p < 0.0001) and SIR-PM (rho=-0.57, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.45, p < 0.0001) moderately negatively correlated with T1 relaxation time. At 3T, correlations between T1 SIR and T1 relaxation time were moderate (rho=-0.40 to -0.43, p ≤ 0.0003). SIR-PS was significantly different between patient groups at 1.5T (p < 0.0001) with pairwise differences between: normal vs. acute on chronic pancreatitis (1.52 vs. 1.13; p < 0.0001). SIR-PM was also significantly different between groups at 1.5T (p < 0.0001) with differences between: normal vs. acute pancreatitis (1.65 vs. 1.40; p = 0.0006), normal vs. acute on chronic pancreatitis (1.65 vs. 1.18; p < 0.0001), and normal vs. chronic pancreatitis (1.65 vs. 1.52; p = 0.0066). A SIR-PS cut-off of ≤ 1.31 had 44% sensitivity and 95% specificity and SIR-PM cut-off of ≤ 1.53 had 69% sensitivity and 70% specificity for pancreatitis. At 3T, SIR-PS was significantly different between groups (p = 0.033) but without significant pairwise differences.At 1.5T pancreas T1 SIR moderately to strongly correlates with estimated T1 relaxation time and is significantly lower in children with pancreatitis.Methods: Our primary purpose was to understand the correlation between pancreas T1-weighted signal intensity ratio (SIR) and T1 relaxation time in children. We also sought to characterize differences in T1 SIR between children without and with pancreatitis.Retrospective study of patients < 18-years-old. SIR-pancreas:spleen (SIR-PS) and SIR-pancreas:paraspinal muscle (SIR-PM) were generated from T1-weighted gradient recalled echo images. Subdivided by field strength, T1 SIR was correlated (Spearman’s) with T1 relaxation time.220 participants were included, 144 imaged at 1.5T (mean: 11.4 ± 4.2 years) and 76 imaged at 3T (mean: 10.9 ± 4.5 years). At 1.5T, SIR-PS (rho=-0.62, 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.51, p < 0.0001) and SIR-PM (rho=-0.57, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.45, p < 0.0001) moderately negatively correlated with T1 relaxation time. At 3T, correlations between T1 SIR and T1 relaxation time were moderate (rho=-0.40 to -0.43, p ≤ 0.0003). SIR-PS was significantly different between patient groups at 1.5T (p < 0.0001) with pairwise differences between: normal vs. acute on chronic pancreatitis (1.52 vs. 1.13; p < 0.0001). SIR-PM was also significantly different between groups at 1.5T (p < 0.0001) with differences between: normal vs. acute pancreatitis (1.65 vs. 1.40; p = 0.0006), normal vs. acute on chronic pancreatitis (1.65 vs. 1.18; p < 0.0001), and normal vs. chronic pancreatitis (1.65 vs. 1.52; p = 0.0066). A SIR-PS cut-off of ≤ 1.31 had 44% sensitivity and 95% specificity and SIR-PM cut-off of ≤ 1.53 had 69% sensitivity and 70% specificity for pancreatitis. At 3T, SIR-PS was significantly different between groups (p = 0.033) but without significant pairwise differences.At 1.5T pancreas T1 SIR moderately to strongly correlates with estimated T1 relaxation time and is significantly lower in children with pancreatitis.Results: Our primary purpose was to understand the correlation between pancreas T1-weighted signal intensity ratio (SIR) and T1 relaxation time in children. We also sought to characterize differences in T1 SIR between children without and with pancreatitis.Retrospective study of patients < 18-years-old. SIR-pancreas:spleen (SIR-PS) and SIR-pancreas:paraspinal muscle (SIR-PM) were generated from T1-weighted gradient recalled echo images. Subdivided by field strength, T1 SIR was correlated (Spearman’s) with T1 relaxation time.220 participants were included, 144 imaged at 1.5T (mean: 11.4 ± 4.2 years) and 76 imaged at 3T (mean: 10.9 ± 4.5 years). At 1.5T, SIR-PS (rho=-0.62, 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.51, p < 0.0001) and SIR-PM (rho=-0.57, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.45, p < 0.0001) moderately negatively correlated with T1 relaxation time. At 3T, correlations between T1 SIR and T1 relaxation time were moderate (rho=-0.40 to -0.43, p ≤ 0.0003). SIR-PS was significantly different between patient groups at 1.5T (p < 0.0001) with pairwise differences between: normal vs. acute on chronic pancreatitis (1.52 vs. 1.13; p < 0.0001). SIR-PM was also significantly different between groups at 1.5T (p < 0.0001) with differences between: normal vs. acute pancreatitis (1.65 vs. 1.40; p = 0.0006), normal vs. acute on chronic pancreatitis (1.65 vs. 1.18; p < 0.0001), and normal vs. chronic pancreatitis (1.65 vs. 1.52; p = 0.0066). A SIR-PS cut-off of ≤ 1.31 had 44% sensitivity and 95% specificity and SIR-PM cut-off of ≤ 1.53 had 69% sensitivity and 70% specificity for pancreatitis. At 3T, SIR-PS was significantly different between groups (p = 0.033) but without significant pairwise differences.At 1.5T pancreas T1 SIR moderately to strongly correlates with estimated T1 relaxation time and is significantly lower in children with pancreatitis.Conclusion: Our primary purpose was to understand the correlation between pancreas T1-weighted signal intensity ratio (SIR) and T1 relaxation time in children. We also sought to characterize differences in T1 SIR between children without and with pancreatitis.Retrospective study of patients < 18-years-old. SIR-pancreas:spleen (SIR-PS) and SIR-pancreas:paraspinal muscle (SIR-PM) were generated from T1-weighted gradient recalled echo images. Subdivided by field strength, T1 SIR was correlated (Spearman’s) with T1 relaxation time.220 participants were included, 144 imaged at 1.5T (mean: 11.4 ± 4.2 years) and 76 imaged at 3T (mean: 10.9 ± 4.5 years). At 1.5T, SIR-PS (rho=-0.62, 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.51, p < 0.0001) and SIR-PM (rho=-0.57, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.45, p < 0.0001) moderately negatively correlated with T1 relaxation time. At 3T, correlations between T1 SIR and T1 relaxation time were moderate (rho=-0.40 to -0.43, p ≤ 0.0003). SIR-PS was significantly different between patient groups at 1.5T (p < 0.0001) with pairwise differences between: normal vs. acute on chronic pancreatitis (1.52 vs. 1.13; p < 0.0001). SIR-PM was also significantly different between groups at 1.5T (p < 0.0001) with differences between: normal vs. acute pancreatitis (1.65 vs. 1.40; p = 0.0006), normal vs. acute on chronic pancreatitis (1.65 vs. 1.18; p < 0.0001), and normal vs. chronic pancreatitis (1.65 vs. 1.52; p = 0.0066). A SIR-PS cut-off of ≤ 1.31 had 44% sensitivity and 95% specificity and SIR-PM cut-off of ≤ 1.53 had 69% sensitivity and 70% specificity for pancreatitis. At 3T, SIR-PS was significantly different between groups (p = 0.033) but without significant pairwise differences.At 1.5T pancreas T1 SIR moderately to strongly correlates with estimated T1 relaxation time and is significantly lower in children with pancreatitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]